People-Centred Medical Image Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26991v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:13:36 GMT
• Title: People-Centred Medical Image Analysis
• Abstract summary: People-Centred Medical Image Analysis (PecMan) is a human-AI framework that jointly optimises fairness, diagnostic accuracy, and workflow effectiveness.<n>We introduce the Fairness and Human-Centred AI (FairHAI) benchmark for evaluating trade-offs between accuracy, fairness, and clinician workload.<n>Experiments using this benchmark show that PecMan consistently outperforms existing methods, paving the way for more trustworthy and clinically viable AI systems.
• Score: 28.028018247982686
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in data-centric medical AI have produced highly accurate diagnostic systems, but the emphasis on data curation and performance metrics has not translated into widespread clinical adoption. We conjecture that this limited uptake stems from insufficient attention dedicated to the optimisation of fair performance across diverse patient populations and to workflow integration: performance biases can create regulatory barriers, and poorly integrated automation can disrupt clinical routines, degrade the quality of human-AI collaboration, and reduce clinicians' willingness to adopt AI tools. Prior work on workflow integration (e.g., Learning to Defer (L2D) and Learning to Complement (L2C)) and AI fairness has typically examined these challenges in isolation, overlooking their natural interdependence and the practical constraints of clinical environments, such as restricted clinician availability. We propose People-Centred Medical Image Analysis (PecMan), a human-AI framework that jointly optimises fairness, diagnostic accuracy, and workflow effectiveness through a dynamic gating mechanism that assigns cases to AI, clinicians, or both under clinician workload constraints. We also introduce the Fairness and Human-Centred AI (FairHAI) benchmark for evaluating trade-offs between accuracy, fairness, and clinician workload. Experiments using this benchmark show that PecMan consistently outperforms existing methods, paving the way for more trustworthy and clinically viable AI systems. Code will be available upon paper acceptance.

Related papers

• Towards a Virtual Neuroscientist: Autonomous Neuroimaging Analysis via Multi-Agent Collaboration [53.772014300855375]
  We introduce NIAgent, a multi-agent system for autonomous end-to-end neuroimaging analysis.<n>Unlike conventional flat tool-calling agents, NIAgent adopts a code-centric execution paradigm.<n>We propose a hierarchical verification framework for autonomous quality control, integrating cohort-level metric screening with agentic visual inspection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T06:30:19Z)
• Augmenting Clinical Decision-Making with an Interactive and Interpretable AI Copilot: A Real-World User Study with Clinicians in Nephrology and Obstetrics [36.981753143345664]
  We present AICare, an interactive and interpretable AI copilot for collaborative clinical decision-making.<n>By analyzing longitudinal electronic health records, AICare grounds dynamic risk predictions in scrutable visualizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T13:41:32Z)
• Timely Clinical Diagnosis through Active Test Selection [49.091903570068155]
  We propose ACTMED (Adaptive Clinical Test selection via Model-based Experimental Design) to better emulate real-world diagnostic reasoning.<n>LLMs act as flexible simulators, generating plausible patient state distributions and supporting belief updates without requiring structured, task-specific training data.<n>We evaluate ACTMED on real-world datasets and show it can optimize test selection to improve diagnostic accuracy, interpretability, and resource use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T18:10:45Z)
• Towards Human-AI Collaboration System for the Detection of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma in Histopathology Images [0.7150262752562336]
  Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) is the most prevalent form of breast cancer.<n>We propose a human-in-the-loop (HITL) deep learning system designed to detect IDC in histopathology images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T11:45:57Z)
• Over-Relying on Reliance: Towards Realistic Evaluations of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support [12.247046469627554]
  We advocate for moving beyond evaluation metrics like Trust, Reliance, Acceptance, and Performance on the AI's task.<n>We call on the community to prioritize ecologically valid, domain-appropriate study setups that measure the emergent forms of value that AI can bring to healthcare professionals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T03:28:56Z)
• Ethical Challenges and Evolving Strategies in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice [1.0301404234578682]
  We focus on five critical ethical concerns: justice and fairness, transparency, patient consent and confidentiality, accountability, and patient-centered and equitable care.<n>The paper explores how bias, lack of transparency, and challenges in maintaining patient trust can undermine the effectiveness and fairness of AI applications in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T00:52:22Z)
• AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
  We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z)
• RAISE -- Radiology AI Safety, an End-to-end lifecycle approach [5.829180249228172]
  The integration of AI into radiology introduces opportunities for improved clinical care provision and efficiency. The focus should be on ensuring models meet the highest standards of safety, effectiveness and efficacy. The roadmap presented herein aims to expedite the achievement of deployable, reliable, and safe AI in radiology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T15:59:14Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• Detecting Shortcut Learning for Fair Medical AI using Shortcut Testing [62.9062883851246]
  Machine learning holds great promise for improving healthcare, but it is critical to ensure that its use will not propagate or amplify health disparities. One potential driver of algorithmic unfairness, shortcut learning, arises when ML models base predictions on improper correlations in the training data. Using multi-task learning, we propose the first method to assess and mitigate shortcut learning as a part of the fairness assessment of clinical ML systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T09:35:38Z)
• Robust and Efficient Medical Imaging with Self-Supervision [80.62711706785834]
  We present REMEDIS, a unified representation learning strategy to improve robustness and data-efficiency of medical imaging AI. We study a diverse range of medical imaging tasks and simulate three realistic application scenarios using retrospective data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T17:34:18Z)
• The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation [81.72197368690031]
  We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making. The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.