RAISE -- Radiology AI Safety, an End-to-end lifecycle approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14570v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:59:14 GMT
• Title: RAISE -- Radiology AI Safety, an End-to-end lifecycle approach
• Authors: M. Jorge Cardoso, Julia Moosbauer, Tessa S. Cook, B. Selnur Erdal, Brad Genereaux, Vikash Gupta, Bennett A. Landman, Tiarna Lee, Parashkev Nachev, Elanchezhian Somasundaram, Ronald M. Summers, Khaled Younis, Sebastien Ourselin, Franz MJ Pfister
• Abstract summary: The integration of AI into radiology introduces opportunities for improved clinical care provision and efficiency. The focus should be on ensuring models meet the highest standards of safety, effectiveness and efficacy. The roadmap presented herein aims to expedite the achievement of deployable, reliable, and safe AI in radiology.
• Score: 5.829180249228172
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The integration of AI into radiology introduces opportunities for improved clinical care provision and efficiency but it demands a meticulous approach to mitigate potential risks as with any other new technology. Beginning with rigorous pre-deployment evaluation and validation, the focus should be on ensuring models meet the highest standards of safety, effectiveness and efficacy for their intended applications. Input and output guardrails implemented during production usage act as an additional layer of protection, identifying and addressing individual failures as they occur. Continuous post-deployment monitoring allows for tracking population-level performance (data drift), fairness, and value delivery over time. Scheduling reviews of post-deployment model performance and educating radiologists about new algorithmic-driven findings is critical for AI to be effective in clinical practice. Recognizing that no single AI solution can provide absolute assurance even when limited to its intended use, the synergistic application of quality assurance at multiple levels - regulatory, clinical, technical, and ethical - is emphasized. Collaborative efforts between stakeholders spanning healthcare systems, industry, academia, and government are imperative to address the multifaceted challenges involved. Trust in AI is an earned privilege, contingent on a broad set of goals, among them transparently demonstrating that the AI adheres to the same rigorous safety, effectiveness and efficacy standards as other established medical technologies. By doing so, developers can instil confidence among providers and patients alike, enabling the responsible scaling of AI and the realization of its potential benefits. The roadmap presented herein aims to expedite the achievement of deployable, reliable, and safe AI in radiology.

Related papers

• ADAPT: A Game-Theoretic and Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Automated Distributed Adaptive Penetration Testing [13.101825065498552]
  The integration of AI into modern critical infrastructure systems, such as healthcare, has introduced new vulnerabilities. ADAPT is a game-theoretic and neuro-symbolic framework for automated distributed adaptive penetration testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T21:32:17Z)
• Safety challenges of AI in medicine [23.817939398729955]
  Review examines potential risks in AI practices that may compromise safety in medicine. Examines reduced performance across diverse populations, inconsistent operational stability, the need for high-quality data for effective model tuning, and the risk of data breaches during model development and deployment. Second part of this article explores safety issues specific to large language models (LLMs) in medical contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T13:47:47Z)
• Beyond One-Time Validation: A Framework for Adaptive Validation of Prognostic and Diagnostic AI-based Medical Devices [55.319842359034546]
  Existing approaches often fall short in addressing the complexity of practically deploying these devices. The presented framework emphasizes the importance of repeating validation and fine-tuning during deployment. It is positioned within the current US and EU regulatory landscapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T11:13:52Z)
• AI-Driven Healthcare: A Survey on Ensuring Fairness and Mitigating Bias [2.398440840890111]
  AI applications have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment personalization, and patient outcome predictions. These advancements also introduce substantial ethical and fairness challenges. These biases can lead to disparities in healthcare delivery, affecting diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes across different demographic groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T02:39:17Z)
• TrialBench: Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence-Ready Clinical Trial Datasets [57.067409211231244]
  This paper presents meticulously curated AIready datasets covering multi-modal data (e.g., drug molecule, disease code, text, categorical/numerical features) and 8 crucial prediction challenges in clinical trial design. We provide basic validation methods for each task to ensure the datasets' usability and reliability. We anticipate that the availability of such open-access datasets will catalyze the development of advanced AI approaches for clinical trial design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T09:13:10Z)
• Fair by design: A sociotechnical approach to justifying the fairness of AI-enabled systems across the lifecycle [0.8164978442203773]
  Fairness is one of the most commonly identified ethical principles in existing AI guidelines. The development of fair AI-enabled systems is required by new and emerging AI regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T12:03:29Z)
• Functional requirements to mitigate the Risk of Harm to Patients from Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare [0.0]
  This study proposes 14 functional requirements that AI systems may implement to reduce the risks associated with their medical purpose. Our intention here is to provide specific high-level specifications of technical solutions to ensure continuous good performance and use of AI systems to benefit patients in compliance with the future EU regulatory framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T08:37:22Z)
• FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
  Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z)
• U-PASS: an Uncertainty-guided deep learning Pipeline for Automated Sleep Staging [61.6346401960268]
  We propose a machine learning pipeline called U-PASS tailored for clinical applications that incorporates uncertainty estimation at every stage of the process. We apply our uncertainty-guided deep learning pipeline to the challenging problem of sleep staging and demonstrate that it systematically improves performance at every stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T08:27:36Z)
• Robust and Efficient Medical Imaging with Self-Supervision [80.62711706785834]
  We present REMEDIS, a unified representation learning strategy to improve robustness and data-efficiency of medical imaging AI. We study a diverse range of medical imaging tasks and simulate three realistic application scenarios using retrospective data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T17:34:18Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.