Unpacking Vibe Coding: Help-Seeking Processes in Student-AI Interactions While Programming

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27134v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:35:10 GMT
• Title: Unpacking Vibe Coding: Help-Seeking Processes in Student-AI Interactions While Programming
• Abstract summary: Generative AI is reshaping higher education programming through vibe coding, where students collaborate with AI via natural language.<n>We analyze 19,418 interaction turns from 110 undergraduate students to compare top- and low-performing students.<n>Results reveal that top performers engaged in instrumental help-seeking, eliciting tutor-like AI responses.
• Score: 1.3802799822705387
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI is reshaping higher education programming through vibe coding, where students collaborate with AI via natural language rather than writing code line-by-line. We conceptualize this practice as help-seeking, analyzing 19,418 interaction turns from 110 undergraduate students. Using inductive coding and Heterogeneous Transition Network Analysis, we examined interaction sequences to compare top- and low-performing students. Results reveal that top performers engaged in instrumental help-seeking -- inquiry and exploration -- eliciting tutor-like AI responses. In contrast, low performers relied on executive help-seeking, frequently delegating tasks and prompting the AI to assume an executor role focused on ready-made solutions. These findings indicate that currently generative AI mirrors student intent (whether productive or passive) rather than optimizing for learning. To evolve from tools to teammates, AI systems must move beyond passive compliance. We argue for pedagogically aligned design that detect unproductive delegation and adaptively steer educational interactions toward inquiry, ensuring student-AI partnerships augment rather than replace cognitive effort.

Related papers

• AI-Assisted Help-Seeking Trajectories in Programming Education from an SRL-Informed Perspective [11.163797770670683]
  This study analyzed AI-assisted help-seeking trajectories in university-level programming.<n>Results indicate that many students primarily used AI for reactive troubleshooting rather than for planned, self-regulated problem-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T03:37:58Z)
• Intentmaking and Sensemaking: Human Interaction with AI-Guided Mathematical Discovery [72.49593499512092]
  We identify and characterize a distinct workflow we term intentmaking.<n>We frame this as a natural extension to sensemaking.<n>Our documentation of these themes suggests an approach to designing AI tools for scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:30:25Z)
• Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph [11.960431631791812]
  EvoGraph is a plugin that integrates AI interactions and code changes as a lightweight and interactive development graph.<n>Our user study with 20 participants revealed that EvoGraph addressed developers' challenges while imposing lower cognitive load.<n>Our work highlights design opportunities for tools to help developers make sense of and act on their problem-solving progress in the emerging AI-mediated programming context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T22:05:09Z)
• From Individual Prompts to Collective Intelligence: Mainstreaming Generative AI in the Classroom [2.7886031629181987]
  We argue for a shift toward collective intelligence (CI)-focused pedagogy, where GenAI acts as a catalyst for peer-to-peer learning.<n>We implement Generative CI activities in two undergraduate engineering courses, engaging 140 students through thinking routines.<n>Results demonstrate that students value the combination of human collaboration with strategic AI support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T08:28:20Z)
• "Can you feel the vibes?": An exploration of novice programmer engagement with vibe coding [42.82674998306379]
  "vibe coding" refers to creating software via natural language prompts rather than direct code authorship.<n>This paper reports on a one-day educational hackathon investigating how novice programmers and mixed-experience teams engage with vibe coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T13:32:23Z)
• Scaffolding Metacognition in Programming Education: Understanding Student-AI Interactions and Design Implications [10.81558535566768]
  Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT now provide novice programmers with unprecedented access to instant, personalized support.<n>While this holds clear promise, their influence on students' metacognitive processes remains underexplored.<n>This study addresses that gap by analyzing student-AI interactions through a metacognitive lens in university-level programming courses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T07:42:24Z)
• Do Students Rely on AI? Analysis of Student-ChatGPT Conversations from a Field Study [10.71612026319996]
  This study analyzed 315 student-AI conversations during a brief, quiz-based scenario across various STEM courses.<n>Students exhibited overall low reliance on AI and many of them could not effectively use AI for learning.<n>Certain behavioral metrics strongly predicted AI reliance, highlighting potential behavioral mechanisms to explain AI adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T20:00:27Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• Let people fail! Exploring the influence of explainable virtual and robotic agents in learning-by-doing tasks [45.23431596135002]
  This study compares the effects of classic vs. partner-aware explanations on human behavior and performance during a learning-by-doing task. Results indicated that partner-aware explanations influenced participants differently based on the type of artificial agents involved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T13:22:04Z)
• Learning to Prompt in the Classroom to Understand AI Limits: A pilot study [35.06607166918901]
  Large Language Models (LLM) and the derived chatbots, like ChatGPT, have highly improved the natural language processing capabilities of AI systems. However, excitement has led to negative sentiments, even as AI methods demonstrate remarkable contributions. A pilot educational intervention was performed in a high school with 21 students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T07:51:37Z)
• Assigning AI: Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts [0.0]
  This paper examines the transformative role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education and their potential as learning tools. The authors propose seven approaches for utilizing AI in classrooms: AI-tutor, AI-coach, AI-mentor, AI-teammate, AI-tool, AI-simulator, and AI-student.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:36:36Z)
• Human Decision Makings on Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with Difficulty Adjustment [52.07473934146584]
  We guide the curriculum reinforcement learning results towards a preferred performance level that is neither too hard nor too easy via learning from the human decision process. Our system is highly parallelizable, making it possible for a human to train large-scale reinforcement learning applications. It shows reinforcement learning performance can successfully adjust in sync with the human desired difficulty level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-04T23:53:51Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Adversarial Interaction Attack: Fooling AI to Misinterpret Human Intentions [46.87576410532481]
  We show that, despite their current huge success, deep learning based AI systems can be easily fooled by subtle adversarial noise. Based on a case study of skeleton-based human interactions, we propose a novel adversarial attack on interactions. Our study highlights potential risks in the interaction loop with AI and humans, which need to be carefully addressed when deploying AI systems in safety-critical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-17T16:23:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.