Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18883v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:05:09 GMT
• Title: Choose Your Own Adventure: Non-Linear AI-Assisted Programming with EvoGraph
• Abstract summary: EvoGraph is a plugin that integrates AI interactions and code changes as a lightweight and interactive development graph.<n>Our user study with 20 participants revealed that EvoGraph addressed developers' challenges while imposing lower cognitive load.<n>Our work highlights design opportunities for tools to help developers make sense of and act on their problem-solving progress in the emerging AI-mediated programming context.
• Score: 11.960431631791812
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Current AI-assisted programming tools are predominantly linear and chat-based, which deviates from the iterative and branching nature of programming itself. Our preliminary study with developers using AI assistants suggested that they often struggle to explore alternatives, manage prompting sequences, and trace changes. Informed by these insights, we created EvoGraph, an IDE plugin that integrates AI interactions and code changes as a lightweight and interactive development graph. EvoGraph automatically records a branching AI-assisted coding history and allows developers to manipulate the graph to compare, merge, and revisit prior collaborative AI programming states. Our user study with 20 participants revealed that EvoGraph addressed developers' challenges identified in our preliminary study while imposing lower cognitive load. Participants also found the graph-based representation supported safe exploration, efficient iteration, and reflection on AI-generated changes. Our work highlights design opportunities for tools to help developers make sense of and act on their problem-solving progress in the emerging AI-mediated programming context.

Related papers

• Intentmaking and Sensemaking: Human Interaction with AI-Guided Mathematical Discovery [72.49593499512092]
  We identify and characterize a distinct workflow we term intentmaking.<n>We frame this as a natural extension to sensemaking.<n>Our documentation of these themes suggests an approach to designing AI tools for scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:30:25Z)
• Unpacking Vibe Coding: Help-Seeking Processes in Student-AI Interactions While Programming [1.3802799822705387]
  Generative AI is reshaping higher education programming through vibe coding, where students collaborate with AI via natural language.<n>We analyze 19,418 interaction turns from 110 undergraduate students to compare top- and low-performing students.<n>Results reveal that top performers engaged in instrumental help-seeking, eliciting tutor-like AI responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T19:35:10Z)
• How Do Developers Interact with AI? An Exploratory Study on Modeling Developer Programming Behavior [8.956327421839205]
  We show how hidden intentions and emotional dimensions intertwine with concrete actions during AI-assisted programming.<n>Using AI assistants often makes developers more focused on actively creating code, evaluating, and verifying generated results.<n>Some developers reported impostor-like feelings, expressing guilt or self-doubt about relying on AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T14:37:19Z)
• "Can you feel the vibes?": An exploration of novice programmer engagement with vibe coding [42.82674998306379]
  "vibe coding" refers to creating software via natural language prompts rather than direct code authorship.<n>This paper reports on a one-day educational hackathon investigating how novice programmers and mixed-experience teams engage with vibe coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T13:32:23Z)
• A Viable Paradigm of Software Automation: Iterative End-to-End Automated Software Development [41.295627885484855]
  We present a vision of an iterative end-to-end automated software development paradigm AutoSW.<n>It operates in an analyze-plan-implement-deliver loop, where AI systems as human partners become first-class actors.<n>The results indicate that AutoSW can successfully deliver executable software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T09:57:49Z)
• Generative AI and the Transformation of Software Development Practices [0.0]
  Generative AI is reshaping how software is designed, written, and maintained.<n>This paper examines how AI-assisted techniques are changing software engineering practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T22:02:10Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities [117.49715661395294]
  Data structurization can play a promising role by transforming intricate and disorganized data into well-structured forms.<n>This survey presents a first systematic review of how graphs can empower AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T12:59:12Z)
• Reflection on Data Storytelling Tools in the Generative AI Era from the Human-AI Collaboration Perspective [54.152639172274]
  Large-scale generative AI techniques have the potential to enhance data storytelling with their power in visual and narration generation.<n>We compare the collaboration patterns of the latest tools with those of earlier ones using a dedicated framework for understanding human-AI collaboration in data storytelling.<n>The benefits of these AI techniques and implications to human-AI collaboration are also revealed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T13:56:18Z)
• How Developers Interact with AI: A Taxonomy of Human-AI Collaboration in Software Engineering [8.65285948382426]
  We propose a taxonomy of interaction types between developers and AI tools, identifying eleven distinct interaction types.<n>Building on this taxonomy, we outline a research agenda focused on optimizing AI interactions, improving developer control, and addressing trust and usability challenges in AI-assisted development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T12:53:49Z)
• Exploring the intersection of Generative AI and Software Development [0.0]
  The synergy between generative AI and Software Engineering emerges as a transformative frontier. This whitepaper delves into the unexplored realm, elucidating how generative AI techniques can revolutionize software development. It serves as a guide for stakeholders, urging discussions and experiments in the application of generative AI in Software Engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T19:23:23Z)
• Reading Between the Lines: Modeling User Behavior and Costs in AI-Assisted Programming [28.254978977288868]
  We studied GitHub Copilot, a code-recommendation system used by millions of programmers daily. We developed CUPS, a taxonomy of common programmer activities when interacting with Copilot. Our insights reveal how programmers interact with Copilot and motivate new interface designs and metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T20:01:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.