ConformaDecompose: Explaining Uncertainty via Calibration Localization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27149v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 19:58:15 GMT
• Title: ConformaDecompose: Explaining Uncertainty via Calibration Localization
• Abstract summary: Conformal Prediction provides distribution-free prediction intervals with guaranteed coverage.<n>Its reliance on a single global calibration threshold obscures the sources of uncertainty at the instance level.<n>We introduce an uncertainty-aware explainability framework that analyses the reducibility of calibration-induced uncertainty.
• Score: 0.26385121748044166
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Conformal Prediction provides distribution-free prediction intervals with guaranteed coverage, but its reliance on a single global calibration threshold obscures the sources of uncertainty at the instance level. In particular, it conflates irreducible noise with uncertainty induced by heterogeneous training data (aleatoric), model limitations, or calibration mismatch (epistemic), offering little insight into why an interval is wide or whether it could be reduced. We introduce an uncertainty-aware explainability framework that analyses the reducibility of calibration-induced epistemic conformal uncertainty via progressive calibration localisation for regression tasks. The approach is diagnostic rather than causal: it does not estimate true aleatoric or epistemic uncertainty, but explains how conformal intervals contract and stabilise as calibration support is localised around a test instance. Across benchmarks and real-world data, absolute reducible uncertainty aligns with epistemic proxies, while its relative contribution varies by task, revealing regimes hidden by interval width. This instance-level view complements conformal uncertainty, enhancing interpretability without altering the predictor or coverage.

Related papers

• A Unified Risk View of Uncertainty: Posterior Risk for Disentanglement and Evaluation Beyond Proxies [2.854451361373021]
  We propose a unified definition of uncertainty as pointwise posterior risk, the expected loss of a predictor under the distribution of plausible ground-truth functions.<n>This view combines Bayesian uncertainty over functions with estimator-dependent deviations from the posterior mean, capturing effects such as misspecification and optimization error.<n>By avoiding proxy evaluations, the benchmark enables fine-grained analysis of uncertainty estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T13:05:16Z)
• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• Local Conformal Calibration of Dynamics Uncertainty from Semantic Images [11.10792616622245]
  We introduce Observation-aware Conformal Uncertainty Local-Calibration (OCULAR)<n>OCULAR is a conformal prediction-based algorithm that uses perception information to provide uncertainty quantification guarantees.<n>We validate our algorithm on a double-integrator system subject to random perturbations and significant model mismatch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T05:33:42Z)
• Direct Learning of Calibration-Aware Uncertainty for Neural PDE Surrogates [0.0]
  Cross-regularized uncertainty learns uncertainty parameters during training using routed through a held-out regularization split.<n>The predictor is optimized on the training split for fit, while low-dimensional uncertainty controls are optimized on the regularization split to reduce train-test mismatch.<n>We instantiate the approach in Fourier Neural Operators and evaluate on APEBench sweeps over observed fraction and training-set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T17:57:20Z)
• Calibrated Decomposition of Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Deep Features for Inference-Time Adaptation [3.018583625592182]
  Most estimators collapse all uncertainty modes into a single confidence score, preventing reliable reasoning about when to allocate more compute or adjust inference.<n>We introduce Uncertainty-Guided Inference-Time Selection, a lightweight inference time framework that disentangles aleatoric (data-driven) and model-driven uncertainty directly in deep feature space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T23:47:30Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Post-Hoc Calibration: Mitigating Confidently Incorrect Predictions Beyond Calibration Metrics [6.9681910774977815]
  This paper presents a post-hoc calibration framework to enhance calibration quality and uncertainty-aware decision-making.<n>A comprehensive evaluation is conducted using calibration metrics, uncertainty-aware performance measures, and empirical conformal coverage.<n> Experiments show that the proposed method achieves lower confidently incorrect predictions, and competitive Expected Error compared with isotonic and focal-loss baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T23:55:36Z)
• Adaptive Individual Uncertainty under Out-Of-Distribution Shift with Expert-Routed Conformal Prediction [8.306260695214972]
  We introduce Trustworthy Expert Split-conformal with Scaled Estimation for Efficient Reliable Adaptive intervals (TESSERA)<n>TESSERA provides per-sample uncertainty with reliable coverage guarantee, informative and adaptive prediction interval widths that track the absolute error.<n>We evaluate on protein-ligand binding affinity prediction under both independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) and scaffold-based out-of-distribution (OOD) splits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T01:51:33Z)
• SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models [59.25881667640868]
  We propose a novel approach termed Selective Conformal Uncertainty (SConU)<n>We develop two conformal p-values that are instrumental in determining whether a given sample deviates from the uncertainty distribution of the calibration set at a specific manageable risk level.<n>Our approach not only facilitates rigorous management of miscoverage rates across both single-domain and interdisciplinary contexts, but also enhances the efficiency of predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T03:01:45Z)
• Probabilistic Modeling of Disparity Uncertainty for Robust and Efficient Stereo Matching [61.73532883992135]
  We propose a new uncertainty-aware stereo matching framework.<n>We adopt Bayes risk as the measurement of uncertainty and use it to separately estimate data and model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T23:28:20Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• Unsupervised Calibration under Covariate Shift [92.02278658443166]
  We introduce the problem of calibration under domain shift and propose an importance sampling based approach to address it. We evaluate and discuss the efficacy of our method on both real-world datasets and synthetic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T21:50:07Z)
• Distribution-free binary classification: prediction sets, confidence intervals and calibration [106.50279469344937]
  We study three notions of uncertainty quantification -- calibration, confidence intervals and prediction sets -- for binary classification in the distribution-free setting. We derive confidence intervals for binned probabilities for both fixed-width and uniform-mass binning. As a consequence of our 'tripod' theorems, these confidence intervals for binned probabilities lead to distribution-free calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T14:17:29Z)
• CRUDE: Calibrating Regression Uncertainty Distributions Empirically [4.552831400384914]
  Calibrated uncertainty estimates in machine learning are crucial to many fields such as autonomous vehicles, medicine, and weather and climate forecasting. We present a calibration method for regression settings that does not assume a particular uncertainty distribution over the error: Calibrating Regression Uncertainty Distributions Empirically (CRUDE) CRUDE demonstrates consistently sharper, better calibrated, and more accurate uncertainty estimates than state-of-the-art techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T03:08:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.