When Good OCR Is Not Enough: Benchmarking OCR Robustness for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00911v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 09:42:42 GMT
• Title: When Good OCR Is Not Enough: Benchmarking OCR Robustness for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
• Abstract summary: Industrial Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems depend on optical character recognition (OCR) to transform visual documents into text.<n>Existing OCR benchmarks rely on character-level metrics, which inadequately measure downstream RAG effectiveness under real-world conditions.<n>We introduce an OCR benchmark for industrial RAG systems covering 11 challenging document types.
• Score: 2.8437065210971872
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Industrial Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems depend on optical character recognition (OCR) to transform visual documents into text. Existing OCR benchmarks rely on character-level metrics, which inadequately measure downstream RAG effectiveness under real-world conditions. We introduce an OCR benchmark for industrial RAG systems covering 11 challenging document types, including extreme layouts, high-resolution pages, complex or watermarked backgrounds, historical documents with non-standard reading orders, visually decorated text, and documents containing tables and mathematical formulas. Evaluating recent SOTA OCR models under a controlled OCR-first RAG pipeline shows clear performance degradation on realistic industrial documents despite strong conventional benchmark scores. We find that high OCR accuracy does not necessarily translate into strong downstream RAG performance: structural and semantic errors can cause substantial retrieval failures even when WER/CER remains low. Further analysis shows that this mismatch is category-dependent, arises through both retrieval-side and downstream generation-side failures, and remains stable across representative OCR-first pipeline choices. The benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/Qihoo360/InduOCRBench.

Related papers

• TongGuOCR: A Layout-Aware and Token-Augmented OCR MLLM for Chinese Historical Documents [50.64307290680222]
  TongGuOCR is a layout-aware and token-augmented multimodal large language model (MLLM) for OCR of Chinese historical documents.<n>TongGuOCR achieves 93.76 AR and reduces NED from 10.43 to 6.15 and RO-ED from 7.53 to 3.49 relative to the best competing score for each metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T04:50:00Z)
• When Low CER is Not Enough: An Analysis of Hallucinations in Vision-Language OCR Systems on Historical Uruguayan Documents [6.6457932580691015]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged as strong alternatives to traditional OCR systems.<n>In this work, we benchmark traditional OCR systems and VLM-based approaches on the Berrutti dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T07:19:00Z)
• How Robust is OCR-Reasoning? Evaluating OCR-Reasoning Robustness of Vision-Language Models under Visual Perturbations [17.186250064889887]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance on OCR-based benchmarks, but their robustness under controlled visual degradation remains insufficiently understood.<n>We introduce OCR-Robust, a benchmark designed for evaluating OCR reasoning robustness under visual perturbations.<n>We conduct a pilot study over 18 candidate perturbations and select 5 representative types at 3 severity levels each based on their impact and cross-model discriminability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T17:15:42Z)
• Align Documents to Questions: Question-Oriented Document Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [51.55755193937205]
  We propose QREAM, a style-controlled rewriter that aligns retrieved documents with a question-oriented style while preserving facts.<n>Our framework consists of two stages: (1) QREAM-ICL, which uses stylistic seeds to guide iterative rewriting exploration; and (2) QREAM-FT, a lightweight student model distilled from denoised ICL outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-19T08:39:21Z)
• GLM-OCR Technical Report [65.42028025507491]
  GLM-OCR is an efficient compact model designed for real-world document understanding.<n>It combines a CogViT visual encoder with a GLM language decoder, achieving a strong balance between computational efficiency and recognition performance.<n>Extensive evaluations on public benchmarks and industrial scenarios show that GLM-OCR achieves competitive or state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T15:55:47Z)
• Reasoning-OCR: Can Large Multimodal Models Solve Complex Logical Reasoning Problems from OCR Cues? [73.35232225256968]
  Reasoning-OCR challenges LMMs to solve complex reasoning problems based on the cues that can be extracted from rich visual-text.<n>Our evaluation offers some insights for proprietary and open-source LMMs in different reasoning challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T06:45:18Z)
• Lost in OCR Translation? Vision-Based Approaches to Robust Document Retrieval [38.569818461453394]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique for grounding responses in external documents.<n>Traditional RAG systems rely on Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to first process scanned documents into text.<n>Recent vision-language approaches, such as ColPali, propose direct visual embedding of documents, eliminating the need for OCR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T21:54:02Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• OCR Hinders RAG: Evaluating the Cascading Impact of OCR on Retrieval-Augmented Generation [39.83221375597683]
  Retrieval-augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge to reduce hallucinations and incorporate up-to-date information without retraining.<n>As an essential part of RAG, external knowledge bases are commonly built by extracting structured data from unstructured PDF documents using Optical Character Recognition (OCR)<n>In this paper, we introduce OHRBench, the first benchmark for understanding the cascading impact of OCR on RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T17:23:47Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• User-Centric Evaluation of OCR Systems for Kwak'wala [92.73847703011353]
  We show that utilizing OCR reduces the time spent in the manual transcription of culturally valuable documents by over 50%. Our results demonstrate the potential benefits that OCR tools can have on downstream language documentation and revitalization efforts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-26T21:41:15Z)
• Donut: Document Understanding Transformer without OCR [17.397447819420695]
  We propose a novel VDU model that is end-to-end trainable without underpinning OCR framework. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on various document understanding tasks in public benchmark datasets and private industrial service datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T18:55:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.