Medmarks: A Comprehensive Open-Source LLM Benchmark Suite for Medical Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01417v1
• Date: Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:03 GMT
• Title: Medmarks: A Comprehensive Open-Source LLM Benchmark Suite for Medical Tasks
• Abstract summary: We introduce Medmarks, a fully open-source evaluation suite with 30 benchmarks spanning question answering, information extraction, medical calculations, and open-ended clinical reasoning.<n>We perform a systematic evaluation of 61 models across 71 configurations using verifiable metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge.
• Score: 12.131182745922843
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for medical applications remains challenging due to benchmark saturation, limited data accessibility, and insufficient coverage of relevant tasks. Existing suites have either saturated, heavily depend on restricted datasets, or lack comprehensive model coverage. We introduce Medmarks, a fully open-source evaluation suite with 30 benchmarks spanning question answering, information extraction, medical calculations, and open-ended clinical reasoning. We perform a systematic evaluation of 61 models across 71 configurations using verifiable metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge. Our results show that frontier reasoning models (Gemini 3 Pro Preview, GPT-5.1, & GPT-5.2) achieve the highest performance across both benchmarks, most frontier proprietary models are significantly more token efficient than open-weight alternatives, medically fine-tuned models outperform their generalist counterparts, and that models are susceptible to answer-order bias (particularly smaller models and Grok 4). A subset of our evals (Medmarks-T) can be directly used as reinforcement learning environments to post-train LLMs for medical reasoning. Code is available at https://github.com/MedARC-AI/Medmarks

Related papers

• Evaluating Small Open LLMs for Medical Question Answering: A Practical Framework [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) in medical question answering demands more than high average accuracy.<n>Online health communities such as Reddit have become a primary source of medical information for millions of users.<n>We present a practical, open-source evaluation framework for assessing small, locally-deployable open-weight LLMs on medical question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-12T08:56:15Z)
• When Metrics Disagree: Automatic Similarity vs. LLM-as-a-Judge for Clinical Dialogue Evaluation [18.338933046286257]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly employed to address diverse problems, including medical queries.<n>LLMs often perform poorly in medical contexts, potentially leading to harmful misguidance for users.<n>This paper focuses on fine-tuning the Llama 2 7B, a transformer-based, decoder-only model, using transcripts from real patient-doctor interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T21:09:43Z)
• Med-RewardBench: Benchmarking Reward Models and Judges for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models [57.73472878679636]
  We introduce Med-RewardBench, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate medical reward models and judges.<n>Med-RewardBench features a multimodal dataset spanning 13 organ systems and 8 clinical departments, with 1,026 expert-annotated cases.<n>A rigorous three-step process ensures high-quality evaluation data across six clinically critical dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T08:58:39Z)
• MedOmni-45°: A Safety-Performance Benchmark for Reasoning-Oriented LLMs in Medicine [69.08855631283829]
  We introduce Med Omni-45 Degrees, a benchmark designed to quantify safety-performance trade-offs under manipulative hint conditions.<n>It contains 1,804 reasoning-focused medical questions across six specialties and three task types, including 500 from MedMCQA.<n>Results show a consistent safety-performance trade-off, with no model surpassing the diagonal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T08:38:16Z)
• ReasonMed: A 370K Multi-Agent Generated Dataset for Advancing Medical Reasoning [54.30630356786752]
  ReasonMed is the largest medical reasoning dataset to date, with 370k high-quality examples.<n>It is built through a multi-agent generation, verification, and refinement process.<n>Using ReasonMed, we find that integrating detailed CoT reasoning with concise answer summaries yields the most robust fine-tuning results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T08:36:55Z)
• LLMEval-Med: A Real-world Clinical Benchmark for Medical LLMs with Physician Validation [58.25892575437433]
  evaluating large language models (LLMs) in medicine is crucial because medical applications require high accuracy with little room for error.<n>We present LLMEval-Med, a new benchmark covering five core medical areas, including 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records and expert-designed clinical scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T15:43:14Z)
• Benchmarking Open-Source Large Language Models on Healthcare Text Classification Tasks [2.7729041396205014]
  This study evaluates the classification performance of five open-source large language models (LLMs)<n>We report precision, recall, and F1 scores with 95% confidence intervals for all model-task combinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T12:51:52Z)
• Enabling Scalable Evaluation of Bias Patterns in Medical LLMs [2.089191490381739]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive potential in helping with numerous medical challenges.<n>One major area of concern relates to biased behaviors of LLMs in medical applications, leading to unfair treatment of individuals.<n>We present a new method to scale up such bias evaluations by automatically generating test cases based on rigorous medical evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T14:17:03Z)
• Towards Evaluating and Building Versatile Large Language Models for Medicine [57.49547766838095]
  We present MedS-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in clinical contexts. MedS-Bench spans 11 high-level clinical tasks, including clinical report summarization, treatment recommendations, diagnosis, named entity recognition, and medical concept explanation. MedS-Ins comprises 58 medically oriented language corpora, totaling 13.5 million samples across 122 tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T17:01:34Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.<n>We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.<n>Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• Towards a clinically accessible radiology foundation model: open-access and lightweight, with automated evaluation [113.5002649181103]
  Training open-source small multimodal models (SMMs) to bridge competency gaps for unmet clinical needs in radiology. For training, we assemble a large dataset of over 697 thousand radiology image-text pairs. For evaluation, we propose CheXprompt, a GPT-4-based metric for factuality evaluation, and demonstrate its parity with expert evaluation. The inference of LlaVA-Rad is fast and can be performed on a single V100 GPU in private settings, offering a promising state-of-the-art tool for real-world clinical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T18:12:02Z)
• OpenMedLM: Prompt engineering can out-perform fine-tuning in medical question-answering with open-source large language models [4.556924372105915]
  Open-source (OS) models represent a key area of growth for medical LLMs. We present OpenMedLM, a prompting platform which delivers state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance for OS LLMs on medical benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T17:19:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.