Benchmarking Open-Source Large Language Models on Healthcare Text Classification Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15169v2
• Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 11:58:28 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Open-Source Large Language Models on Healthcare Text Classification Tasks
• Authors: Yuting Guo, Abeed Sarker,
• Abstract summary: This study evaluates the classification performance of five open-source large language models (LLMs)<n>We report precision, recall, and F1 scores with 95% confidence intervals for all model-task combinations.
• Score: 2.7729041396205014
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The application of large language models (LLMs) to healthcare information extraction has emerged as a promising approach. This study evaluates the classification performance of five open-source LLMs: GEMMA-3-27B-IT, LLAMA3-70B, LLAMA4-109B, DEEPSEEK-R1-DISTILL-LLAMA-70B, and DEEPSEEK-V3-0324-UD-Q2_K_XL, across six healthcare-related classification tasks involving both social media data (breast cancer, changes in medication regimen, adverse pregnancy outcomes, potential COVID-19 cases) and clinical data (stigma labeling, medication change discussion). We report precision, recall, and F1 scores with 95% confidence intervals for all model-task combinations. Our findings reveal significant performance variability between LLMs, with DeepSeekV3 emerging as the strongest overall performer, achieving the highest F1 scores in four tasks. Notably, models generally performed better on social media tasks compared to clinical data tasks, suggesting potential domain-specific challenges. GEMMA-3-27B-IT demonstrated exceptionally high recall despite its smaller parameter count, while LLAMA4-109B showed surprisingly underwhelming performance compared to its predecessor LLAMA3-70B, indicating that larger parameter counts do not guarantee improved classification results. We observed distinct precision-recall trade-offs across models, with some favoring sensitivity over specificity and vice versa. These findings highlight the importance of task-specific model selection for healthcare applications, considering the particular data domain and precision-recall requirements rather than model size alone. As healthcare increasingly integrates AI-driven text classification tools, this comprehensive benchmarking provides valuable guidance for model selection and implementation while underscoring the need for continued evaluation and domain adaptation of LLMs in healthcare contexts.

Related papers

• Prismatic Synthesis: Gradient-based Data Diversification Boosts Generalization in LLM Reasoning [77.120955854093]
  We show that data diversity can be a strong predictor of generalization in language models.<n>We introduce G-Vendi, a metric that quantifies diversity via the entropy of model-induced gradients.<n>We present Prismatic Synthesis, a framework for generating diverse synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T16:05:10Z)
• PatientDx: Merging Large Language Models for Protecting Data-Privacy in Healthcare [2.1046377530356764]
  Fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs) has become the default practice for improving model performance on a given task.<n>PatientDx is a framework of model merging that allows the design of effective LLMs for health-predictive tasks without requiring fine-tuning nor adaptation on patient data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T08:21:04Z)
• Can Reasoning LLMs Enhance Clinical Document Classification? [7.026393789313748]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising improvements in accuracy and efficiency for this task. This study evaluates the performance and consistency of eight LLMs; four reasoning (Qwen QWQ, Deepseek Reasoner, GPT o3 Mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking) and four non-reasoning (Llama 3.3, GPT 4o Mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Deepseek Chat) Results showed that reasoning models outperformed non-reasoning models in accuracy (71% vs 68%) and F1 score (67% vs 60%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T18:00:27Z)
• Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
  We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references.<n>We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey.<n>Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z)
• Fine-Tuning Open-Source Large Language Models to Improve Their Performance on Radiation Oncology Tasks: A Feasibility Study to Investigate Their Potential Clinical Applications in Radiation Oncology [23.986096971629777]
  Large language models have displayed remarkable capabilities in processing complex text information.<n>This study aims to investigate whether fine-tuning LLMs with domain knowledge can improve the performance on Task.<n>One-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to statistically analyze the results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T20:37:32Z)
• LLM Robustness Against Misinformation in Biomedical Question Answering [50.98256373698759]
  The retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach is used to reduce the confabulation of large language models (LLMs) for question answering. We evaluate the effectiveness and robustness of four LLMs against misinformation in answering biomedical questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T16:23:26Z)
• Biomedical Large Languages Models Seem not to be Superior to Generalist Models on Unseen Medical Data [3.469567586411153]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in biomedical applications, leading to efforts to fine-tune them on domain-specific data. This study evaluates the performance of biomedically fine-tuned LLMs against their general-purpose counterparts on a variety of clinical tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T13:36:22Z)
• Uncertainty Estimation of Large Language Models in Medical Question Answering [60.72223137560633]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for natural language generation in healthcare, but risk hallucinating factually incorrect information. We benchmark popular uncertainty estimation (UE) methods with different model sizes on medical question-answering datasets. Our results show that current approaches generally perform poorly in this domain, highlighting the challenge of UE for medical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T16:51:33Z)
• Improving Entity Recognition Using Ensembles of Deep Learning and Fine-tuned Large Language Models: A Case Study on Adverse Event Extraction from Multiple Sources [13.750202656564907]
  Adverse event (AE) extraction is crucial for monitoring and analyzing the safety profiles of immunizations. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) and traditional deep learning models in AE extraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T03:56:21Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models for Public Health Classification and Extraction Tasks [0.3545046504280562]
  We present evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) for public health tasks involving the classification and extraction of free text.<n>We evaluate eleven open-weight LLMs across all tasks using zero-shot in-context learning.<n>We find promising signs that LLMs may be useful tools for public health experts to extract information from a wide variety of free text sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T16:33:18Z)
• Zero-Shot ECG Classification with Multimodal Learning and Test-time Clinical Knowledge Enhancement [10.611952462532908]
  Multimodal ECG Representation Learning (MERL) is capable of performing zero-shot ECG classification with text prompts. We propose the Clinical Knowledge Enhanced Prompt Engineering (CKEPE) approach to exploit external expert-verified clinical knowledge databases. MERL achieves an average AUC score of 75.2% in zero-shot classification (without training data), 3.2% higher than linear probed eSSL methods with 10% annotated training data, averaged across all six datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T12:28:55Z)
• A comparative study of zero-shot inference with large language models and supervised modeling in breast cancer pathology classification [1.4715634464004446]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising transfer learning capability. LLMs demonstrated the potential to speed up the execution of clinical NLP studies by reducing the need for curating large annotated datasets. This may result in an increase in the utilization of NLP-based variables and outcomes in observational clinical studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T02:05:31Z)
• Low-resource classification of mobility functioning information in clinical sentences using large language models [0.0]
  This study evaluates the ability of publicly available large language models (LLMs) to accurately identify the presence of functioning information from clinical notes. We collect a balanced binary classification dataset of 1000 sentences from the Mobility NER dataset, which was curated from n2c2 clinical notes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T20:59:17Z)
• Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focus [99.33091772494751]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant popularity for their impressive performance across diverse fields. LLMs are prone to hallucinate untruthful or nonsensical outputs that fail to meet user expectations. We propose a novel reference-free, uncertainty-based method for detecting hallucinations in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T08:39:17Z)
• Multistage Collaborative Knowledge Distillation from a Large Language Model for Semi-Supervised Sequence Generation [60.657065293413716]
  We study semi-supervised sequence generation tasks, where the few labeled examples are too scarce to finetune a model. We present the discovery that a student model distilled from a few-shot prompted large language models can commonly generalize better than its teacher.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T01:28:28Z)
• The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease detection [51.697248252191265]
  This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation. We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare. Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z)
• MedAlign: A Clinician-Generated Dataset for Instruction Following with Electronic Medical Records [60.35217378132709]
  Large language models (LLMs) can follow natural language instructions with human-level fluency. evaluating LLMs on realistic text generation tasks for healthcare remains challenging. We introduce MedAlign, a benchmark dataset of 983 natural language instructions for EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-27T12:24:39Z)
• Estimating Large Language Model Capabilities without Labeled Test Data [51.428562302037534]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have the impressive ability to perform in-context learning (ICL) from only a few examples. We propose the task of ICL accuracy estimation, in which we predict the accuracy of an LLM when doing in-context learning on a new task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T06:55:09Z)
• Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts [49.10233060774818]
  We show that learning realistic augmentations automatically from data is possible in a label-efficient manner using generative models. We demonstrate that these learned augmentations can surpass ones by making models more robust and statistically fair in- and out-of-distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T18:15:38Z)
• Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detection [98.5549882883963]
  We present findings from the largest Federated ML study to-date, involving data from 71 healthcare institutions across 6 continents. We generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma. We demonstrate a 33% improvement over a publicly trained model to delineate the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% improvement over the tumor's entire extent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T17:27:00Z)
• Few-Shot Cross-lingual Transfer for Coarse-grained De-identification of Code-Mixed Clinical Texts [56.72488923420374]
  Pre-trained language models (LMs) have shown great potential for cross-lingual transfer in low-resource settings. We show the few-shot cross-lingual transfer property of LMs for named recognition (NER) and apply it to solve a low-resource and real-world challenge of code-mixed (Spanish-Catalan) clinical notes de-identification in the stroke.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-10T21:46:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.