HalluScan: A Systematic Benchmark for Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Instruction-Following LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02443v1
• Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 10:43:27 GMT
• Title: HalluScan: A Systematic Benchmark for Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Instruction-Following LLMs
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse natural language processing tasks.<n>Yet they remain susceptible to hallucinations -- generating content that is factually incorrect, unfaithful to provided context, or misaligned with user instructions.<n>We present HalluScan, a comprehensive benchmark framework that systematically evaluates hallucination detection and mitigation across 72 configurations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse natural language processing tasks, yet they remain susceptible to hallucinations -- generating content that is factually incorrect, unfaithful to provided context, or misaligned with user instructions. We present HalluScan, a comprehensive benchmark framework that systematically evaluates hallucination detection and mitigation across 72 configurations spanning 6 detection methods, 4 open-weight model families, and 3 diverse domains. We introduce three key contributions: (1) HalluScore, a novel composite metric that achieves a Pearson correlation of r = 0.41 with human expert judgments; (2) Adaptive Detection Routing (ADR), an intelligent routing algorithm achieving 2.0x cost reduction with only 0.1% AUROC degradation; and (3) systematic error cascade decomposition revealing substantial variation in hallucination error types across domains. Our experiments reveal that NLI Verification achieves the highest overall AUROC of 0.88, while RAV achieves the second-highest AUROC of 0.66.

Related papers

• Not All Relations Are Equal: Relation-Balanced and Calibrated Graph Learning for Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection [66.44527094471619]
  We present RECAL, an unsupervised framework using relation-balanced masked graph learning to better capture rare interaction patterns.<n>On three DARPA E3 datasets, RECAL achieves F1 scores of 99.99%, 99.93%, and 99.99%, outperforming the best baseline on each dataset by 0.88, 0.82, and 0.42 percentage points, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-15T00:31:01Z)
• Modeling Normal Is All You Need: Joint Latent Clustering for Anomaly Detection in Multimodal Cyber-Physical Systems [47.027290803102666]
  Normal behaviour is the union of many imbalanced, curved, thin-fringed operating regimes.<n>We model the normal law with a jointly learned latent representation plus explicit Gaussian-mixture mode clustering.<n>We evaluate under a deliberately fair protocol: raw point-wise metrics with no point adjustment, a trivial-detector difficulty split, prevalence-matched F1, and train-normal-only calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T10:10:00Z)
• Hallucination Cascade: Analyzing Error Propagation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems [6.047611029478951]
  We conduct 500 cascade experiments across 10 knowledge domains using GPT-5.3, DeepSeek-V3, and LLaMA-3-70B-Instruct.<n>We show that deeper cascades reduce the normalized hallucination score from 0.422 at the first agent to 0.272 at the final agent in 3-agent chains.<n>This reduction is accompanied by a decline in factual accuracy from 0.789 to 0.769, revealing a trade-off between hallucination suppression and factual preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-06T01:56:55Z)
• HalluCXR: Benchmarking and Mitigating Hallucinations in Medical Vision-Language Models for Chest Radiograph Interpretation [7.512887610816016]
  HalluCXR is a benchmark evaluating six architecturally diverse vision-language models across 856 chest radiographs.<n>We find that 61.9--82.3% of outputs contain hallucinations, with clinically dangerous errors in up to 80.2%.<n>These results establish that hallucination auditing, verbosity-based risk monitoring, and ensemble-based safety layers are prerequisites for clinical deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T20:30:32Z)
• Hallucination as an Anomaly: Dynamic Intervention via Probabilistic Circuits [6.667596224057802]
  We propose PCNET, a Probabilistic Circuit trained as a tractable density estimator over the LLM residual stream.<n>The method detects hallucinations as geometric anomalies on the factual manifold, which is done via exact Negative Log-Likelihood computation.<n>PCNET achieves near-perfect hallucination detection across CoQA, SQuAD v2.0, and TriviaQA, with AUROC reaching up to 99%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T10:02:27Z)
• DeepSeek Robustness Against Semantic-Character Dual-Space Mutated Prompt Injection [45.67420390185547]
  We propose PromptFuzz-SC, a semantic-character dual-space mutation framework for evaluating robustness against prompt injection.<n>A hybrid search strategy combining epsilon-greedy exploration and hill-climbing refinement is adopted to efficiently discover high-quality adversarial prompts.<n> Experimental results on DeepSeek demonstrate that dual-space mutation achieves the strongest overall attack performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T10:20:15Z)
• Fragile Reasoning: A Mechanistic Analysis of LLM Sensitivity to Meaning-Preserving Perturbations [2.7946918847372277]
  Large language models demonstrate strong performance on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yet remain surprisingly fragile to meaning-preserving surface perturbations.<n>We systematically evaluate three open-weight LLMs, Mistral-7B, Llama-3-8B, and Qwen2.5-7B, on 677 GSM8K problems paired with semantically equivalent variants.<n>All three models exhibit substantial answer-flip rates (28.8%-45.1%), with number paraphrasing consistently more disruptive than name swaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T05:30:20Z)
• Automated Detection of Dosing Errors in Clinical Trial Narratives: A Multi-Modal Feature Engineering Approach with LightGBM [1.0152838128195467]
  We present an automated system for detecting dosing errors in unstructured clinical trial narratives.<n>Our approach combines 3,451 features spanning traditional NLP (TF-IDF, character n-grams), dense semantic embeddings, domain-specific medical patterns, and transformer-based scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T14:56:34Z)
• The Semantic Illusion: Certified Limits of Embedding-Based Hallucination Detection in RAG Systems [0.0]
  We apply hallucination prediction to RAG detection, transforming scores into decision sets with finite-sample coverage guarantees.<n>We analyze this failure through the lens of distributional tails, showing that while NLI models achieve acceptable AUC (0.81), the "hardest" hallucinations are semantically indistinguishable from faithful responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T04:22:28Z)
• Detecting AI Hallucinations in Finance: An Information-Theoretic Method Cuts Hallucination Rate by 92% [4.693270291878929]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce fluent but unsupported answers - hallucinations.<n>We propose ECLIPSE, a framework that treats hallucination as a mismatch between a model's semantic entropy and the capacity of available evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T05:25:48Z)
• ShortcutBreaker: Low-Rank Noisy Bottleneck with Global Perturbation Attention for Multi-Class Unsupervised Anomaly Detection [59.89803740308262]
  ShortcutBreaker is a novel unified feature-reconstruction framework for MUAD tasks.<n>It features two key innovations to address the issue of shortcuts.<n>The proposed method achieves a remarkable image-level AUROC of 99.8%, 98.9%, 90.6%, and 87.8% on four datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T06:51:30Z)
• ORFuzz: Fuzzing the "Other Side" of LLM Safety -- Testing Over-Refusal [27.26251627767238]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly exhibit over-refusal - erroneously rejecting benign queries due to overly conservative safety measures.<n>This paper introduces the first evolutionary testing framework, ORFuzz, for the systematic detection and analysis of LLM over-refusals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T05:03:26Z)
• ICR Probe: Tracking Hidden State Dynamics for Reliable Hallucination Detection in LLMs [50.18087419133284]
  hallucination detection methods leveraging hidden states predominantly focus on static and isolated representations.<n>We introduce a novel metric, the ICR Score, which quantifies the contribution of modules to the hidden states' update.<n>We propose a hallucination detection method, the ICR Probe, which captures the cross-layer evolution of hidden states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T11:44:26Z)
• "Knowing When You Don't Know": A Multilingual Relevance Assessment Dataset for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation [90.09260023184932]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds Large Language Model (LLM) output by leveraging external knowledge sources to reduce factual hallucinations. NoMIRACL is a human-annotated dataset for evaluating LLM robustness in RAG across 18 typologically diverse languages. We measure relevance assessment using: (i) hallucination rate, measuring model tendency to hallucinate, when the answer is not present in passages in the non-relevant subset, and (ii) error rate, measuring model inaccuracy to recognize relevant passages in the relevant subset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T17:18:04Z)
• A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level Hallucination Detection [63.56136319976554]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) generate hallucinations, which can cause significant damage when deployed for mission-critical tasks. We propose a self-check approach based on reverse validation to detect factual errors automatically in a zero-resource fashion. We empirically evaluate our method and existing zero-resource detection methods on two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:14:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.