Not All Relations Are Equal: Relation-Balanced and Calibrated Graph Learning for Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16462v1
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:31:01 GMT
- Title: Not All Relations Are Equal: Relation-Balanced and Calibrated Graph Learning for Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection
- Abstract summary: We present RECAL, an unsupervised framework using relation-balanced masked graph learning to better capture rare interaction patterns.<n>On three DARPA E3 datasets, RECAL achieves F1 scores of 99.99%, 99.93%, and 99.99%, outperforming the best baseline on each dataset by 0.88, 0.82, and 0.42 percentage points, respectively.
- Score: 66.44527094471619
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Provenance-Based Intrusion Detection Systems (PIDSs) detect Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) by analyzing system interactions. However, existing methods largely treat relations uniformly, overlooking statistical heterogeneity; in CADETS, relation frequencies differ by approximately $140{,}000\times$. This may cause PIDSs to focus more on frequent relations and overlook differences in normal error levels across relations, increasing the risk of false alarms and missed detections. We present RECAL, an unsupervised framework using relation-balanced masked graph learning to better capture rare interaction patterns. It further calibrates reconstruction errors against each relation's benign error distribution to produce comparable anomaly evidence, helping distinguish attacks from benign behavior and reduce false alarms. On three DARPA E3 datasets, RECAL achieves F1 scores of 99.99\%, 99.93\%, and 99.99\%, outperforming the best baseline on each dataset by 0.88, 0.82, and 0.42 percentage points, respectively. Compared with the baseline reporting the lowest FPR, RECAL reduces mean FPR by approximately $105\times$, $4\times$, and $41\times$.
Related papers
- Harnessing Disagreement: Detecting Correlated Agreement Blindness in Multi-Agent Triage [3.164789424470588]
Disagreement-triggered escalation can create a structural blind spot in multi-agent arbitration.<n>We present ARAT, a directed-star system combining an inductive Random Forest (RF) agent, an analogical case-based k-nearest neighbour (k-NN) agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-22T08:35:00Z) - Did We Actually Fix It? An Independent Adversarial Stress-Test of Post-Point-Adjustment Evaluation Metrics for Time-Series Anomaly Detection [0.0]
We ask, independently and adversarially, whether replacement metrics resist no-skill detectors on real benchmarks.<n>We find the answer turns entirely on one overlooked variable: N, the number of random attempts an adversary reports the best of.<n>We recommend reporting single-run scores or disclosing N and preferring PR-based metrics, which resist best-of-N inflation on nearly every benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-12T22:33:07Z) - Modeling Normal Is All You Need: Joint Latent Clustering for Anomaly Detection in Multimodal Cyber-Physical Systems [47.027290803102666]
Normal behaviour is the union of many imbalanced, curved, thin-fringed operating regimes.<n>We model the normal law with a jointly learned latent representation plus explicit Gaussian-mixture mode clustering.<n>We evaluate under a deliberately fair protocol: raw point-wise metrics with no point adjustment, a trivial-detector difficulty split, prevalence-matched F1, and train-normal-only calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T10:10:00Z) - Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable Keystroke Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease [0.0]
Keystroke dynamics have been explored extensively as a passive digital biomarker for Parkinson's disease (PD)<n>We apply inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to keystroke data, modeling each keystroke as a discrete choice over typing speed and recovering.<n>To our knowledge this is the first application of IRL to keystroke dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-24T01:11:05Z) - Amplifying, Not Learning: Fine-Tuned AI Text Detectors Amplify a Pretrained Direction [51.56484100374058]
Text detectors amplify a pretrained typicality axis; they do not construct an AI-vs-human boundary.<n>On raw encoders before any task supervision, projecting onto centroid(AI)-centroid(HC3) achieves NYT-vs-HC3 AUROC 0.806/0.944/0.834 across three architectures.<n>On RoBERTa-base, raw projection exceeds fine-tuning; on RoBERTa-base, full fine-tuning reduces discrimination below raw on both fluent-formal populations tested.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T19:08:38Z) - VNDUQE: Information-Theoretic Novelty Detection using Deep Variational Information Bottleneck [4.618615226841302]
We investigate novelty detection through the Deep Variational Information Bottleneck (VIB)<n>We train VIB models on MNIST with held-out digit classes and evaluate OOD detection using information-theoretic metrics: KL divergence and prediction entropy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-12T05:31:44Z) - Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol [69.11739400975445]
We introduce the first theoretical framework for analyzing error accumulation in Model Context Protocol (MCP) agents.<n>We show that cumulative distortion exhibits linear growth and high-probability deviations bounded by $O(sqrtT)$.<n>Key findings include: semantic weighting reduces distortion by 80%, and periodic re-grounding approximately every 9 steps suffices for error control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-10T21:08:53Z) - Decomposing Uncertainty in Probabilistic Knowledge Graph Embeddings: Why Entity Variance Is Not Enough [0.0]
Probabilistic knowledge graph embeddings represent entities as distributions, using learned variances to quantify uncertainty.<n>These variances are relation-agnostic, meaning an entity receives identical uncertainty regardless of relational context.<n>We prove an impossibility result: any uncertainty estimator using only entity-level statistics independent of relation context achieves near-random OOD detection on novel contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-26T12:38:43Z) - Evaluating Reasoning Faithfulness in Medical Vision-Language Models using Multimodal Perturbations [19.488236277427358]
Vision-language models (VLMs) often produce chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations that sound plausible yet fail to reflect the underlying decision process.<n>We present a clinically grounded framework for chest X-ray visual question answering (VQA) that probes CoT faithfulness via controlled text and image modifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T09:28:22Z) - Collaborative Value Function Estimation Under Model Mismatch: A Federated Temporal Difference Analysis [55.13545823385091]
Federated reinforcement learning (FedRL) enables collaborative learning while preserving data privacy by preventing direct data exchange between agents.<n>In real-world applications, each agent may experience slightly different transition dynamics, leading to inherent model mismatches.<n>We show that even moderate levels of information sharing significantly mitigate environment-specific errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T18:06:28Z) - Policy evaluation from a single path: Multi-step methods, mixing and
mis-specification [45.88067550131531]
We study non-parametric estimation of the value function of an infinite-horizon $gamma$-discounted Markov reward process.
We provide non-asymptotic guarantees for a general family of kernel-based multi-step temporal difference estimates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T23:15:25Z) - Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional
Robustness [48.44639585732391]
In practice, models need to enjoy both types of robustness to ensure reliability.
In this work, we show that in fact, explicit tradeoffs exist between adversarial and natural distributional robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-15T19:58:01Z) - MSED: a multi-modal sleep event detection model for clinical sleep
analysis [62.997667081978825]
We designed a single deep neural network architecture to jointly detect sleep events in a polysomnogram.
The performance of the model was quantified by F1, precision, and recall scores, and by correlating index values to clinical values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-07T13:08:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.