When Audio-Language Models Fail to Leverage Multimodal Context for Dysarthric Speech Recognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02782v1
• Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 16:24:06 GMT
• Title: When Audio-Language Models Fail to Leverage Multimodal Context for Dysarthric Speech Recognition
• Abstract summary: We test whether diagnosis labels, clinician-derived speech ratings, and progressively richer clinical descriptions improve transcription accuracy for dysarthric speech.<n>We find that diagnosis-informed and clinically detailed prompts yield negligible improvements and often degrade word error rate.<n>Subgroup analyses reveal significant gains for Down syndrome and mild-severity speakers.
• Score: 10.779774155043166
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems remain brittle on dysarthric and other atypical speech. Recent audio-language models raise the possibility of improving performance by conditioning on additional clinical context at inference time, but it is unclear whether these models can make use of such information. We introduce a benchmark built on the Speech Accessibility Project (SAP) dataset that tests whether diagnosis labels, clinician-derived speech ratings, and progressively richer clinical descriptions improve transcription accuracy for dysarthric speech. Across matched comparisons on nine models, we find that current models do not meaningfully use this context: diagnosis-informed and clinically detailed prompts yield negligible improvements and often degrade word error rate. We complement the prompting analysis with context-dependent fine-tuning, showing that LoRA adaptation with a mixture of clinical prompt formats achieves a WER of 0.066, a 52% relative reduction over the frozen baseline, while preserving performance when context is unavailable. Subgroup analyses reveal significant gains for Down syndrome and mild-severity speakers. These results clarify where current models fall short and provide a testbed for measuring progress toward more inclusive ASR.

Related papers

• Systematic Study of Dysarthric Speech Recognition: Spectral Features and Acoustic Models [48.10903631277461]
  This paper presents a comprehensive investigation of various combinations of acoustic features tailored to different Acoustic Models.<n>The incorporation of Pitch features notably improved recognition performance, especially for sentence recognition tasks.<n>We have demonstrated the potential to enhance the performance of the state-of-the-art Factorized Time Delay Neural Network (F-TDNN) model for recognizing dysarthric speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T04:57:37Z)
• Impact of automatic speech recognition quality on Alzheimer's disease detection from spontaneous speech: a reproducible benchmark study with lexical modeling and statistical validation [0.0]
  Early detection of Alzheimer's disease from spontaneous speech has emerged as a promising non-invasive screening approach.<n>We investigate Alzheimer's disease detection using lexical features derived from Whisper ASR transcripts on the ADReSSo 2021 diagnosis dataset.<n>Models trained on Whisper-small transcripts consistently outperform those using Whisper-base transcripts, achieving balanced accuracy above 0.7850 with Linear SVM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-18T19:46:29Z)
• Something from Nothing: Data Augmentation for Robust Severity Level Estimation of Dysarthric Speech [69.86604856129883]
  Dysarthric speech quality assessment (DSQA) is critical for clinical diagnostics and inclusive speech technologies.<n>We propose a three-stage framework that leverages unlabeled dysarthric speech and large-scale typical speech datasets to scale training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T23:00:07Z)
• Hallucination Benchmark for Speech Foundation Models [33.92968426403491]
  Hallucinations in automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems refer to fluent and coherent transcriptions produced by neural ASR models that are completely unrelated to the underlying acoustic input (i.e., the speech signal)<n>This apparent coherence can mislead subsequent processing stages and introduce serious risks, particularly in critical domains such as healthcare and law.<n>We introduce SHALLOW, the first benchmark framework that systematically categorizes and quantifies hallucination phenomena in ASR along four complementary axes: lexical, phonetic, morphological, and semantic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T16:26:16Z)
• From Fuzzy Speech to Medical Insight: Benchmarking LLMs on Noisy Patient Narratives [40.12543056558646]
  We present a novel dataset designed to simulate patient self-descriptions characterized by varying levels of linguistic noise, fuzzy language, and layperson terminology.<n>Our dataset comprises clinically consistent scenarios annotated with ground-truth diagnoses, spanning a spectrum of communication clarity to reflect diverse real-world reporting styles.<n>To support and future research, we release the Noisy Diagnostic Benchmark (NDB), a structured dataset of noisy, synthetic patient descriptions designed to stress-test and compare the diagnostic capabilities of large language models (LLMs) under realistic linguistic conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T11:34:46Z)
• NeuroXVocal: Detection and Explanation of Alzheimer's Disease through Non-invasive Analysis of Picture-prompted Speech [4.815952991777717]
  NeuroXVocal is a novel dual-component system that classifies and explains potential Alzheimer's Disease (AD) cases through speech analysis.<n>The classification component (Neuro) processes three distinct data streams: acoustic features capturing speech patterns and voice characteristics, textual features extracted from speech transcriptions, and precomputed embeddings representing linguistic patterns.<n>The explainability component (XVocal) implements a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) approach, leveraging Large Language Models combined with a domain-specific knowledge base of AD research literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T12:09:49Z)
• Dialogue is Better Than Monologue: Instructing Medical LLMs via Strategical Conversations [74.83732294523402]
  We introduce a novel benchmark that simulates real-world diagnostic scenarios, integrating noise and difficulty levels aligned with USMLE standards.<n>We also explore dialogue-based fine-tuning, which transforms static datasets into conversational formats to better capture iterative reasoning processes.<n>Experiments show that dialogue-tuned models outperform traditional methods, with improvements of $9.64%$ in multi-round reasoning scenarios and $6.18%$ in accuracy in a noisy environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T18:58:48Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Network [54.332862955411656]
  Clinical trials are critical for drug development but often suffer from expensive and inefficient patient recruitment. In recent years, machine learning models have been proposed for speeding up patient recruitment via automatically matching patients with clinical trials. We introduce a dynamic tree-based memory network model named TREEMENT to provide accurate and interpretable patient trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:35:09Z)
• A study on the impact of Self-Supervised Learning on automatic dysarthric speech assessment [6.284142286798582]
  We show that HuBERT is the most versatile feature extractor across dysarthria classification, word recognition, and intelligibility classification, achieving respectively $+24.7%, +61%, textand +7.2%$ accuracy compared to classical acoustic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T11:04:02Z)
• The Far Side of Failure: Investigating the Impact of Speech Recognition Errors on Subsequent Dementia Classification [8.032686410648274]
  Linguistic anomalies detectable in spontaneous speech have shown promise for various clinical applications including screening for dementia and other forms of cognitive impairment. The impressive performance of self-supervised learning (SSL) automatic speech recognition (ASR) models with curated speech data is not apparent with challenging speech samples from clinical settings. One of our key findings is that, paradoxically, ASR systems with relatively high error rates can produce transcripts that result in better downstream classification accuracy than classification based on verbatim transcripts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T17:06:45Z)
• Exploring linguistic feature and model combination for speech recognition based automatic AD detection [61.91708957996086]
  Speech based automatic AD screening systems provide a non-intrusive and more scalable alternative to other clinical screening techniques. Scarcity of specialist data leads to uncertainty in both model selection and feature learning when developing such systems. This paper investigates the use of feature and model combination approaches to improve the robustness of domain fine-tuning of BERT and Roberta pre-trained text encoders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T05:09:01Z)
• NUVA: A Naming Utterance Verifier for Aphasia Treatment [49.114436579008476]
  Assessment of speech performance using picture naming tasks is a key method for both diagnosis and monitoring of responses to treatment interventions by people with aphasia (PWA) Here we present NUVA, an utterance verification system incorporating a deep learning element that classifies 'correct' versus'incorrect' naming attempts from aphasic stroke patients. When tested on eight native British-English speaking PWA the system's performance accuracy ranged between 83.6% to 93.6%, with a 10-fold cross-validation mean of 89.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T13:00:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.