Physics-Grounded Multi-Agent Architecture for Traceable, Risk-Aware Human-AI Decision Support in Manufacturing
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04003v1
- Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 17:24:53 GMT
- Title: Physics-Grounded Multi-Agent Architecture for Traceable, Risk-Aware Human-AI Decision Support in Manufacturing
- Abstract summary: High-precision CNC machining of free-form aerospace components requires bounded compensations informed by inspection, simulation, and process knowledge.<n>We present multi-agent knowledge analysis (MAKA), a human-in-the-loop decision-support architecture.<n>MAKA enforces physical plausibility, safety bounds, and completeness before recommendations are surfaced for human approval.
- Score: 1.2090375982772545
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: High-precision CNC machining of free-form aerospace components requires bounded compensations informed by inspection, simulation, and process knowledge. Off-the-shelf large language model (LLM) assistants can generate text, but they do not reliably execute risk-constrained multi-step numerical workflows or provide auditable provenance for high-stakes decisions. We present multi-agent knowledge analysis (MAKA), a human-in-the-loop decision-support architecture that separates intent routing, tools-only quantitative analysis, knowledge graph retrieval, and critic-based verification that enforces physical plausibility, safety bounds, and provenance completeness before recommendations are surfaced for human approval. MAKA is instantiated on a Ti-6Al-4V rotor blade machining testbed by fusing virtual-machining path-tracking error fields, cutting-force and deflection simulations, and scan-based 3D inspection deviation maps from 16 blades. The analysis decomposes deviation into an evidence-linked pathing component, a drift-based wear proxy capturing systematic evolution across parts, a residual systematic compliance term, and a variability proxy for instability-aware escalation. In a three-level tool-orchestration benchmark (single-step through $\geq$3-step stateful sequences), MAKA improves successful tool execution by up to 87.5 percentage points relative to an unstructured single-model interaction pattern with identical tool access. Digital twin what-if studies show MAKA can coordinate traceable compensation candidates that reduce predicted surface deviation from order $10^{-2}$in to approximately $\pm 10^{-3}$in over most of the blade within the simulation environment, providing a pre-deployment verification signal for risk-aware human decision-making.
Related papers
- Surrogate Assisted Pedestrian Protection Design via a Foundation Model Orchestrated Workflow [0.0]
We present the first foundation model--orchestrated workflow for crash safety design.<n>It enables surrogate-assisted exploration for pedestrian protection, reducing evaluation time from hours per CAE simulation to seconds.<n>In an automotive front-bumper case study, the workflow produces 35 distinct safety-compliant alternatives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-16T06:27:38Z) - ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox [61.862814740220806]
$textbfComplexMCP$ is a benchmark designed to evaluate agents in rigorous conditions.<n>Built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), $textbfComplexMCP$ provides over 300 meticulously tested tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-11T16:20:51Z) - LiveFMBench: Unveiling the Power and Limits of Agentic Workflows in Specification Generation [75.05397479715576]
Large language models (LLMs) and agents have shown promising progress, but their true capabilities and failure modes remain unclear.<n>We present the first systematic and contamination-aware study of LLM- and agent-based formal specification generation for C programs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-02T11:31:33Z) - From Perception to Autonomous Computational Modeling: A Multi-Agent Approach [0.0]
We present a solver-agnostic framework in which coordinated large language model (LLM) agents autonomously execute the complete computational mechanics workflow.<n>Agents are formalised as conditioned operators on a shared context space with quality gates that introduce conditional iteration between pipeline layers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-08T07:56:34Z) - Claw-Eval: Toward Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents [66.97968363332465]
We introduce Claw-Eval, an end-to-end evaluation suite addressing all three gaps in agent benchmarks.<n>Claw-Eval comprises 300 human-verified tasks spanning 9 categories across three groups.<n>Every agent action is recorded through three independent evidence channels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T17:43:18Z) - Dynamic analysis enhances issue resolution [53.50448142467294]
DAIRA (Dynamic Analysis-enhanced Issue Resolution Agent) is an automated repair framework that embeds dynamic analysis into the agent's reasoning cycle.<n> Driven by a Test Tracing-Driven methodology, DAIRA utilizes lightweight monitors to extract critical runtime data.<n>When powered by Gemini 3 Flash Preview, DAIRA establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, achieving a 79.4% resolution rate on the SWE-bench Verified dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T14:48:54Z) - A Blueprint for Self-Evolving Coding Agents in Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Prediction [9.020568132598827]
We present a contract-centric blueprint for self-evolving coding agents that discover executable surrogate pipelines for predicting drag coefficient $C_d$ under industrial constraints.<n>The method formulates surrogate discovery as constrained optimization over programs, not static model instances.<n>A hard evaluation contract enforces leakage prevention, deterministic replay, multi-seed, robustness and resource budgets before any candidate is admitted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T08:36:57Z) - Metacognitive Self-Correction for Multi-Agent System via Prototype-Guided Next-Execution Reconstruction [58.51530390018909]
Large Language Model based multi-agent systems excel at collaborative problem solving but remain brittle to cascading errors.<n>We present MASC, a metacognitive framework that endows MAS with real-time, unsupervised, step-level error detection and self-correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T05:35:37Z) - Tractable Asymmetric Verification for Large Language Models via Deterministic Replicability [0.6117371161379209]
The landscape of Large Language Models (LLMs) shifts rapidly towards dynamic, multi-agent systems.<n>This paper proposes a verification framework that achieves tractable asymmetric effort.<n>We show that targeted verification can be over 12 times faster than full regeneration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-14T03:30:06Z) - Adaptive Monitoring and Real-World Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems [3.215065407261898]
Multi-agent systems that combine large language models with external tools are rapidly transitioning from research laboratories into high-stakes domains.<n>This "Advanced" sequel fills that gap by providing an algorithmic instantiation or empirical evidence.<n>AMDM cuts anomaly-detection latency from 12.3 s to 5.6 s on simulated goal drift and reduces false-positive rates from 4.5% to 0.9%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-28T15:52:49Z) - MCP-Orchestrated Multi-Agent System for Automated Disinformation Detection [84.75972919995398]
This paper presents a multi-agent system that uses relation extraction to detect disinformation in news articles.<n>The proposed Agentic AI system combines four agents: (i) a machine learning agent (logistic regression), (ii) a Wikipedia knowledge check agent, and (iv) a web-scraped data analyzer.<n>Results demonstrate that the multi-agent ensemble achieves 95.3% accuracy with an F1 score of 0.964, significantly outperforming individual agents and traditional approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T19:14:48Z) - Nonintrusive Uncertainty Quantification for automotive crash problems
with VPS/Pamcrash [0.0]
surrogate models (metamodels) allow drastically reducing the computational cost of Monte Carlo process.
kernel Principal Component Analysis (kPCA) is found to be effective to simplify the model outcome description.
A benchmark crash test is used to show the efficiency of combining metamodels with kPCA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-15T16:59:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.