Accountable Agents in Software Engineering: An Analysis of Terms of Service and a Research Roadmap

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04532v1
• Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 06:18:59 GMT
• Title: Accountable Agents in Software Engineering: An Analysis of Terms of Service and a Research Roadmap
• Abstract summary: We present a comparative analysis of the Terms of Service for widely used AI coding assistants and agent-enabled development tools.<n>Our analysis reveals a consistent tendency to shift responsibility for correctness, safety, and legal compliance onto users.<n>We argue that existing policy frameworks are poorly aligned with increasingly agent-mediated and autonomous software development.
• Score: 10.967845122224299
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: AI coding assistants and autonomous agents are becoming integral to software development workflows, reshaping how code is produced, reviewed, and maintained. While recent research has focused mainly on the capabilities and impacts of productivity of these systems, much less attention has been paid to accountability: who is responsible when agents generate, modify, or recommend code? In practice, accountability is defined through the Terms of Service (ToS) and related policy documents that govern the use of AI-powered development tools. In this vision paper, we present a comparative analysis of the Terms of Service for widely used AI coding assistants and agent-enabled development tools. We examine how these documents allocate ownership, responsibility, liability, and disclosure obligations between tool providers and software developers, and we identify common patterns and divergences between providers. Our analysis reveals a consistent tendency to shift responsibility for correctness, safety, and legal compliance onto users, as well as substantial variation in how providers address issues such as indemnification, data reuse, and acceptable use. Based on these findings, we argue that existing policy frameworks are poorly aligned with increasingly agent-mediated and autonomous software development workflows. We outline a research roadmap for accountable agents in software engineering, identifying challenges and opportunities for modeling responsibility, designing governance artifacts, developing tooling that supports accountability, and conducting empirical studies of developers' perceptions and practices.

Related papers

• On Automated and Explainable Provenance of AI-Generated Code [56.818202904805446]
  We argue that the next generation of CodeGenAI tools must be built on a foundation of explainable provenance.<n>We describe a research program combining large-scale empirical studies with post-hoc causal and interpretability techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:50:31Z)
• How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests [5.6795075579540395]
  This study aims to characterize agentic pull requests (PR) in comparison to human generated PRs.<n>We first analyze how differences in merge rates between agentic and human generated PRs vary over time.<n>We then identify the types of development tasks where AI coding agents are predominantly applied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-23T21:48:28Z)
• AI-driven Software Development: A Pragmatic Path to Agentic Development Processes [0.06423291545613526]
  Generative AI is transforming software development from localized tool support into development work that is embedded in processes, tools, and organizational structures.<n>This paper develops a pragmatic organizing framework for the transition toward AI-driven Software Development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T12:43:38Z)
• Code as Agent Harness [107.31925305395957]
  In emerging agentic systems, code is no longer only a target output.<n>Code increasingly serves as an operational substrate for agent reasoning, acting, environment modeling, and execution-based verification.<n>This survey provides a unified roadmap toward executable, verifiable, and stateful AI agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T17:59:03Z)
• Bridging the Gap on AI-Assisted Scientific Software Development Through Transparency and Traceability [4.466942018046944]
  Researchers are already using large language models to write code, generate test cases, and draft documentation.<n>This ad hoc, ungoverned use of AI represents a systemic risk to scientific software quality.<n>This paper proposes guidance for AI-assisted code development in the context of strict software quality assurance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T22:08:52Z)
• Software Vulnerability Management in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: An Industry Perspective [1.0705399532413618]
  Our study aims to determine the extent of the adoption of AI-powered tools for Software Vulnerability Management.<n>We conducted a survey study involving 60 practitioners from diverse industry sectors across 27 countries.<n>Our findings indicate that AI-powered tools are used throughout the SVM life cycle, with 69% of users reporting satisfaction with their current use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-20T07:58:35Z)
• Professional Software Developers Don't Vibe, They Control: AI Agent Use for Coding in 2025 [15.51798857332735]
  This paper investigates how experienced developers use agents in building software.<n>We find that while developers value agents as a productivity boost, they retain their agency in software design and implementation.<n>Our results shed light on the value of software development best practices in effective use of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T02:15:06Z)
• An Empirical Study of Agent Developer Practices in AI Agent Frameworks [59.862193600499914]
  The rise of large language models (LLMs) has sparked a surge of interest in agents, leading to the rapid growth of agent frameworks.<n>Despite widespread use of agent frameworks, their practical applications and how they influence the agent development process remain underexplored.<n>More than 80% of developers report difficulties in identifying the frameworks that best meet their specific development requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T17:52:15Z)
• AI Agentic Programming: A Survey of Techniques, Challenges, and Opportunities [8.086360127362815]
  Large language model (LLM)-based coding agents autonomously plan, execute, and interact with tools such as compilers, debuggers, and version control systems.<n>Unlike conventional code generation, these agents decompose goals, coordinate multi-step processes, and adapt based on feedback, reshaping software development practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T00:14:31Z)
• Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
  We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z)
• OSS-UAgent: An Agent-based Usability Evaluation Framework for Open Source Software [47.02288620982592]
  Our framework employs intelligent agents powered by large language models (LLMs) to simulate developers performing programming tasks.<n> OSS-UAgent ensures accurate and context-aware code generation.<n>Our demonstration showcases OSS-UAgent's practical application in evaluating graph analytics platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T08:40:10Z)
• Interactive Agents to Overcome Ambiguity in Software Engineering [61.40183840499932]
  AI agents are increasingly being deployed to automate tasks, often based on ambiguous and underspecified user instructions.<n>Making unwarranted assumptions and failing to ask clarifying questions can lead to suboptimal outcomes.<n>We study the ability of LLM agents to handle ambiguous instructions in interactive code generation settings by evaluating proprietary and open-weight models on their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T17:12:26Z)
• Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
  This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation. We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.