Not Every Subject Should Stay: Machine Unlearning for Noisy Engagement Recognition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04713v1
• Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 10:03:06 GMT
• Title: Not Every Subject Should Stay: Machine Unlearning for Noisy Engagement Recognition
• Abstract summary: Engagement recognition datasets are typically subject-indexed and often contain noisy, subjective supervision.<n>We study this setting through subject-level machine unlearning as a post-hoc sanitization mechanism for engagement recognition.
• Score: 53.005382593686356
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Engagement recognition datasets are typically subject-indexed and often contain noisy, subjective supervision, making post-hoc dataset revision a practical problem. Existing noisy-label and data-cleaning methods largely operate at the sample level before or during training, but do not directly address a different question: once a model has already been trained, can the influence of an entire problematic subject be removed without full retraining? We study this setting through subject-level machine unlearning as a post-hoc sanitization mechanism for engagement recognition. Starting from a baseline trained on all subjects, we rank candidate harmful subjects using a model-dependent proxy, apply a lightweight approximate unlearning update, and compare the result against an oracle model retrained from scratch on the retained subjects only. We instantiate this protocol on DAiSEE and EngageNet using Tensor-Convolution and Convolution-Transformer Network (TCCT-Net) as a fixed platform and evaluate three matched model states under the same removal scenario: baseline, unlearned, and oracle. In representative K=3 forget-set settings, the unlearned model recovers 89.3% and 92.5% of the oracle gain on EngageNet and DAiSEE, respectively, at roughly one quarter of retraining cost. Across the tested small-audit regimes, effectiveness is strongest at an intermediate forget-set size, indicating that approximate subject-level unlearning is a useful low-cost correction mechanism, but one whose benefit depends on subject selection quality and removal regime.

Related papers

• On-the-go Forgetting without Explicit Unlearning via ERASE [2.6426981014417046]
  ERASE is a framework for on-the-go forgetting that suppresses the observable influence of private data without modifying model weights.<n>We rigorously characterize sufficient conditions when ERASE provably achieves functional forgetting of designated subclasses.<n> ERASE maintains the best observed balance between forgetting efficacy, computational efficiency, and retention fidelity over recent unlearning-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T08:09:27Z)
• Grokked Models are Better Unlearners [5.8757712547216485]
  Starting from grokked checkpoints consistently yields more efficient forgetting.<n>Post-grokking models learn more modular representations with reduced gradient alignment between forget and retain subsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T04:35:49Z)
• PRUNE: A Patching Based Repair Framework for Certifiable Unlearning of Neural Networks [6.251501206858703]
  It is desirable to remove (a.k.a. unlearn) a specific part of the training data from a trained neural network model.<n>Existing unlearning methods involve training alternative models with remaining data.<n>We propose a novel unlearning approach by imposing carefully crafted "patch" on the original neural network to achieve targeted "forgetting" of the requested data to delete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-10T05:35:08Z)
• Are We Truly Forgetting? A Critical Re-examination of Machine Unlearning Evaluation Protocols [14.961054239793356]
  We introduce a rigorous unlearning evaluation setup, in which forgetting classes exhibit semantic similarity to downstream task classes.<n>We hope our benchmark serves as a standardized protocol for evaluating unlearning algorithms under realistic conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T07:11:34Z)
• UPCORE: Utility-Preserving Coreset Selection for Balanced Unlearning [57.081646768835704]
  User specifications or legal frameworks often require information to be removed from pretrained models, including large language models (LLMs)<n>This requires deleting or "forgetting" a set of data points from an already-trained model, which typically degrades its performance on other data points.<n>We propose UPCORE, a method-agnostic data selection framework for mitigating collateral damage during unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T22:51:10Z)
• Incremental Self-training for Semi-supervised Learning [56.57057576885672]
  IST is simple yet effective and fits existing self-training-based semi-supervised learning methods. We verify the proposed IST on five datasets and two types of backbone, effectively improving the recognition accuracy and learning speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-14T05:02:00Z)
• Partially Blinded Unlearning: Class Unlearning for Deep Networks a Bayesian Perspective [4.31734012105466]
  Machine Unlearning is the process of selectively discarding information designated to specific sets or classes of data from a pre-trained model. We propose a methodology tailored for the purposeful elimination of information linked to a specific class of data from a pre-trained classification network. Our novel approach, termed textbfPartially-Blinded Unlearning (PBU), surpasses existing state-of-the-art class unlearning methods, demonstrating superior effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T17:33:22Z)
• Rethinking Classifier Re-Training in Long-Tailed Recognition: A Simple Logits Retargeting Approach [102.0769560460338]
  We develop a simple logits approach (LORT) without the requirement of prior knowledge of the number of samples per class. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on various imbalanced datasets, including CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T03:27:08Z)
• Robust Outlier Rejection for 3D Registration with Variational Bayes [70.98659381852787]
  We develop a novel variational non-local network-based outlier rejection framework for robust alignment. We propose a voting-based inlier searching strategy to cluster the high-quality hypothetical inliers for transformation estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T03:48:56Z)
• Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels [72.81914952849334]
  We propose first scenarios for unlearning and labels in machine learning models. Our approach builds on the concept of influence functions and realizes unlearning through closed-form updates of model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T04:42:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.