Automatically Finding and Validating Unexpected Side-Effects of Interventions on Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05090v1
• Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 16:27:23 GMT
• Title: Automatically Finding and Validating Unexpected Side-Effects of Interventions on Language Models
• Abstract summary: We present an automated, contrastive evaluation pipeline for auditing the behavioral impact of interventions on large language models.<n>We evaluate the approach in synthetic setting by injecting known behavioral changes and showing that the pipeline reliably recovers them.<n>Overall, the pipeline provides a statistically grounded and interpretable tool for post-hoc auditing of intervention-induced changes in model behavior.
• Score: 0.9099663022952497
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present an automated, contrastive evaluation pipeline for auditing the behavioral impact of interventions on large language models. Given a base model $M_1$ and an intervention model $M_2$, our method compares their free-form, multi-token generations across aligned prompt contexts and produces human-readable, statistically validated natural-language hypotheses describing how the models differ, along with recurring themes that summarize patterns across validated hypotheses. We evaluate the approach in synthetic setting by injecting known behavioral changes and showing that the pipeline reliably recovers them. We then apply it to three real-world interventions, reasoning distillation, knowledge editing and unlearning, demonstrating that the method surfaces both intended and unexpected behavioral shifts, distinguishes large from subtle interventions, and does not hallucinate differences when effects are absent or misaligned with the prompt bank. Overall, the pipeline provides a statistically grounded and interpretable tool for post-hoc auditing of intervention-induced changes in model behavior.

Related papers

• Reading Cognition as Decisions Unfold in Words: A Factorized Inverse Decision Model [67.84198127797005]
  Inverse decision modeling infers latent properties of decision processes from observed behavior.<n>We propose a factorized inverse decision model (FIDM) that decomposes each individual's task-execution likelihood into an action factor and an effort factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T07:46:13Z)
• Internal Causal Mechanisms Robustly Predict Language Model Out-of-Distribution Behaviors [61.92704516732144]
  We show that the most robust features for correctness prediction are those that play a distinctive causal role in the model's behavior.<n>We propose two methods that leverage causal mechanisms to predict the correctness of model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T00:31:39Z)
• ACTIVA: Amortized Causal Effect Estimation via Transformer-based Variational Autoencoder [7.987204219322316]
  We propose ACTIVA, a conditional variational autoencoder architecture for amortized causal inference.<n>ACTIVA learns a latent representation conditioned on observational inputs and intervention queries, enabling zero-shot inference.<n>We provide theoretical insights showing that ACTIVA predicts interventional distributions as mixtures over observationally equivalent causal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T08:28:25Z)
• Gumbel Counterfactual Generation From Language Models [64.55296662926919]
  We show that counterfactual reasoning is conceptually distinct from interventions.<n>We propose a framework for generating true string counterfactuals.<n>We show that the approach produces meaningful counterfactuals while at the same time showing that commonly used intervention techniques have considerable undesired side effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T17:57:30Z)
• Estimating the Causal Effects of Natural Logic Features in Transformer-Based NLI Models [16.328341121232484]
  We apply causal effect estimation strategies to measure the effect of context interventions. We investigate robustness to irrelevant changes and sensitivity to impactful changes of Transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T10:22:35Z)
• Representation Surgery: Theory and Practice of Affine Steering [72.61363182652853]
  Language models often exhibit undesirable behavior, e.g., generating toxic or gender-biased text.<n>One natural (and common) approach to prevent the model from exhibiting undesirable behavior is to steer the model's representations.<n>This paper investigates the formal and empirical properties of steering functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T00:20:30Z)
• Semantic Sensitivities and Inconsistent Predictions: Measuring the Fragility of NLI Models [44.56781176879151]
  State-of-the-art Natural Language Inference (NLI) models are sensitive towards minor semantics preserving surface-form variations. We show that semantic sensitivity causes performance degradations of $12.92%$ and $23.71%$ average over $textbfin-$ and $textbfout-of-$ domain settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T14:47:05Z)
• Analyzing Semantic Faithfulness of Language Models via Input Intervention on Question Answering [4.799822253865053]
  We formalize a notion of semantic faithfulness, in which the semantic content of a text should causally figure in a model's inferences in question answering. We show that transformer models fail to be semantically faithful once we perform two semantic interventions: deletion intervention and negation intervention. We propose an intervention-based training regime that can mitigate the undesirable effects for deletion intervention by a significant margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T00:00:01Z)
• Differentiable Causal Discovery Under Latent Interventions [3.867363075280544]
  Recent work has shown promising results in causal discovery by leveraging interventional data with gradient-based methods, even when the intervened variables are unknown. We envision a scenario with an extensive dataset sampled from multiple intervention distributions and one observation distribution, but where we do not know which distribution originated each sample and how the intervention affected the system. We propose a method based on neural networks and variational inference that addresses this scenario by framing it as learning a shared causal graph among an infinite mixture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T14:21:28Z)
• Towards Robust and Adaptive Motion Forecasting: A Causal Representation Perspective [72.55093886515824]
  We introduce a causal formalism of motion forecasting, which casts the problem as a dynamic process with three groups of latent variables. We devise a modular architecture that factorizes the representations of invariant mechanisms and style confounders to approximate a causal graph. Experiment results on synthetic and real datasets show that our three proposed components significantly improve the robustness and reusability of the learned motion representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T18:59:09Z)
• Avoiding Inference Heuristics in Few-shot Prompt-based Finetuning [57.4036085386653]
  We show that prompt-based models for sentence pair classification tasks still suffer from a common pitfall of adopting inferences based on lexical overlap. We then show that adding a regularization that preserves pretraining weights is effective in mitigating this destructive tendency of few-shot finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T10:10:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.