Bridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Code

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05267v1
• Date: Wed, 06 May 2026 09:38:31 GMT
• Title: Bridging Generation and Training: A Systematic Review of Quality Issues in LLMs for Code
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate defective outputs in code generation tasks.<n>This paper presents a systematic literature review of 114 primary studies to investigate how training data quality issues propagate into code generation.<n>We establish a unified taxonomy that categorizes generated code quality issues across nine dimensions and training data quality issues into code and non-code attributes.
• Score: 43.25979680914508
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate defective outputs in code generation tasks, ranging from logical bugs to security vulnerabilities. While these generation failures are often treated as model-level limitations, empirical evidence increasingly traces their root causes to imperfections within the training corpora. Yet, the specific mechanisms linking training data quality issues to generated code quality issues remain largely unmapped. This paper presents a systematic literature review of 114 primary studies to investigate how training data quality issues propagate into code generation. We establish a unified taxonomy that categorizes generated code quality issues across nine dimensions and training data quality issues into code and non-code attributes. Based on this taxonomy, we formalize a causal framework detailing 18 typical propagation mapping mechanisms. Furthermore, we synthesize state-of-the-art detection and mitigation techniques across the data, model, and generation lifecycles. The reviewed literature reveals a clear methodological shift: quality assurance is transitioning from reactive, heuristic-based post-generation filtering toward proactive, data-centric governance and closed-loop repair. Finally, we identify open challenges and outline research directions for developing reliable LLMs for code through integrated data curation and continuous evaluation. Our repository is available at https://github.com/SYSUSELab/From-Data-to-Code.

Related papers

• On Automated and Explainable Provenance of AI-Generated Code [56.818202904805446]
  We argue that the next generation of CodeGenAI tools must be built on a foundation of explainable provenance.<n>We describe a research program combining large-scale empirical studies with post-hoc causal and interpretability techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:50:31Z)
• A Survey of Bugs in AI-Generated Code [7.6152117373301875]
  Several quality issues associated with AI-generated code have been reported, including bugs and defects.<n>This paper systematically analyzes the existing AI-generated code literature to establish an overall understanding of bugs and defects in generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T20:35:59Z)
• A Causal Perspective on Measuring, Explaining and Mitigating Smells in LLM-Generated Code [49.09545217453401]
  Propensity Smelly Score (PSC) is a metric that estimates the likelihood of generating particular smell types.<n>We identify how generation strategy, model size, model architecture and prompt formulation shape the structural properties of generated code.<n> PSC helps developers interpret model behavior and assess code quality, providing evidence that smell propensity signals can support human judgement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T19:18:28Z)
• Taming Imperfect Process Verifiers: A Sampling Perspective on Backtracking [54.43083499412643]
  Test-time algorithms that combine the generative power of language models with process verifiers offer a promising lever for eliciting new reasoning capabilities.<n>We introduce a new process-guided test-time sampling algorithm, VGB, which uses theoretically grounded backtracking to achieve provably better robustness to verifier errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T16:21:14Z)
• A Note on Code Quality Score: LLMs for Maintainable Large Codebases [1.9989195565248983]
  This paper introduces Code Quality Score (CQS) system to automatically detect issues with a set of code changes.<n>At its core, the CQS system is powered by two Llama3 models, fine-tuned (with SFT and offline RL approaches)<n>To maintain good user experience, we layer the system with hand-crafted rules to filter out incorrect responses/hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T21:09:45Z)
• Training Language Models to Generate Quality Code with Program Analysis Feedback [66.0854002147103]
  Code generation with large language models (LLMs) is increasingly adopted in production but fails to ensure code quality.<n>We propose REAL, a reinforcement learning framework that incentivizes LLMs to generate production-quality code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:57:47Z)
• Synthetic Code Surgery: Repairing Bugs and Vulnerabilities with LLMs and Synthetic Data [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel methodology for enhancing Automated Program Repair (APR) through synthetic data generation utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The proposed approach addresses this limitation through a two-phase process: a synthetic sample generation followed by a rigorous quality assessment.<n> Experimental evaluation on the VulRepair test set dataset showed statistically significant improvements in Perfect Prediction rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T09:14:20Z)
• Adaptive Distraction: Probing LLM Contextual Robustness with Automated Tree Search [76.54475437069395]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to maintain their original performance when faced with semantically coherent but task-irrelevant contextual information.<n>We propose a dynamic distraction generation framework based on tree search, where the generation process is guided by model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:43:36Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [92.62952504133926]
  This study evaluated the performance of three leading closed-source LLMs and six popular open-source LLMs on three commonly used benchmarks.<n>We developed a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes and analyzed the root cause for common bug types.<n>We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• A Simple, Yet Effective Approach to Finding Biases in Code Generation [16.094062131137722]
  This work shows that current code generation systems exhibit undesired biases inherited from their large language model backbones. We propose the "block of influence" concept, which enables a modular decomposition and analysis of the coding challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T15:06:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.