Operationalizing Ethics for AI Agents: How Developers Encode Values into Repository Context Files
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05584v1
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 02:03:36 GMT
- Title: Operationalizing Ethics for AI Agents: How Developers Encode Values into Repository Context Files
- Abstract summary: This vision paper investigates how ethics and values are already being translated for AI agents into actionable instructions that shape agent behavior.<n>We find that developers are already embedding guidance related to fairness, accessibility, sustainability, tone, and privacy.
- Score: 11.207503404473842
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As AI coding agents become embedded in software development workflows, developers are beginning to operationalize ethical principles by encoding behavioral rules into repository-level context files for AI agents, such as AGENTS.md files. Rather than examining the ethics of AI agents in the abstract, this vision paper investigates how ethics and values are already being translated for AI agents into actionable instructions that shape agent behavior. Through a preliminary investigation, we find that developers are already embedding guidance related to fairness, accessibility, sustainability, tone, and privacy. These artifacts function as a developer-authored governance layer, translating abstract principles into situated, natural-language directives within development workflows. We outline a research agenda for studying this emerging practice, including how encoded values vary across communities, what governance dynamics emerge when multiple contributors negotiate these files, and whether agents reliably adhere to the constraints specified. Understanding how ethics and values are operationalized for AI agents is essential to ground AI governance in modern software engineering practice.
Related papers
- PRAXIS: Graph-Grounded Tacit Knowledge for Domain Code Generation [61.752289169878566]
We identify the root cause of the agent's lack of tacit knowledge, including domain-specific business rules, interface contracts, and operational conventions that developers internalize through practice but never document.<n>This knowledge is deeply buried beneath the domain code, across code entities and their dependency relations, and invisible to the agent that lacks it.<n>We propose PRAXIS, a framework that enables agents to extract, represent, and reuse tacit knowledge for domain code generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-20T08:28:28Z) - How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests [5.6795075579540395]
This study aims to characterize agentic pull requests (PR) in comparison to human generated PRs.<n>We first analyze how differences in merge rates between agentic and human generated PRs vary over time.<n>We then identify the types of development tasks where AI coding agents are predominantly applied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-23T21:48:28Z) - Accountable Agents in Software Engineering: An Analysis of Terms of Service and a Research Roadmap [10.967845122224299]
We present a comparative analysis of the Terms of Service for widely used AI coding assistants and agent-enabled development tools.<n>Our analysis reveals a consistent tendency to shift responsibility for correctness, safety, and legal compliance onto users.<n>We argue that existing policy frameworks are poorly aligned with increasingly agent-mediated and autonomous software development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T06:18:59Z) - Position: agentic AI orchestration should be Bayes-consistent [92.04373485710285]
This paper argues that coherent decision-making requires Bayesian principles at the orchestration level of the agentic system.<n>It provides examples and design patterns to illustrate how beliefs and utility-aware policies can improve agentic AI orchestration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-01T15:43:43Z) - Agentic AI-assisted coding offers a unique opportunity to instill epistemic grounding during software development [0.02058747290260746]
Chat-based vibe coding has evolved into fully fledged AI-assisted, agentic software development using agent scaffolds.<n>One current trend is utilizing documents beyond this plan document, such as project and method-scoped documents.<n>Here we propose GROUNDING.md, a community-governed, field-scoped grounding document.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-23T14:50:35Z) - A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Models [93.88284590533242]
"Vibe Coding" is a development methodology where developers validate AI-generated implementations through outcome observation.<n>Despite its transformative potential, the effectiveness of this emergent paradigm remains under-explored.<n>This survey provides the first comprehensive and systematic review of Vibe Coding with large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-14T11:26:56Z) - Code with Me or for Me? How Increasing AI Automation Transforms Developer Workflows [60.04362496037186]
We present the first controlled study of developer interactions with coding agents.<n>We evaluate two leading copilot and agentic coding assistants.<n>Our results show agents can assist developers in ways that surpass copilots.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-10T20:12:54Z) - Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents [61.132523071109354]
This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators and users, modelling their strategic choices under different regulatory scenarios.<n>Our research identifies emerging behaviours of strategic AI agents, which tend to adopt more "pessimistic" stances than pure game-theoretic agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-11T15:41:21Z) - Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z) - Can We Trust AI Agents? A Case Study of an LLM-Based Multi-Agent System for Ethical AI [10.084913433923566]
AI-based systems impact millions by supporting diverse tasks but face issues like misinformation, bias, and misuse.<n>This study examines the use of Large Language Models (LLM) for AI ethics in practice.<n>We design a prototype, where agents engage in structured discussions on real-world AI ethics issues from the AI Incident Database.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T20:17:59Z) - RE-centric Recommendations for the Development of Trustworthy(er)
Autonomous Systems [4.268504966623082]
Complying with the EU AI Act (AIA) guidelines while developing and implementing AI systems will soon be mandatory within the EU.
practitioners lack actionable instructions to operationalise ethics during AI systems development.
A literature review of different ethical guidelines revealed inconsistencies in the principles addressed and the terminology used to describe them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T11:57:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.