COVID-19 Infodemic. Understanding content features in detecting fake news using a machine learning approach
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06435v1
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 15:36:17 GMT
- Title: COVID-19 Infodemic. Understanding content features in detecting fake news using a machine learning approach
- Abstract summary: This study investigates a selection of content features such as word bigrams, part of speech distribution etc. to improve fake news detection.<n>We performed a series of experiments on a new dataset gathered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: The use of content features, particularly textual and linguistic for fake news detection is under-researched, despite empirical evidence showing the features could contribute to differentiating real and fake news. To this end, this study investigates a selection of content features such as word bigrams, part of speech distribution etc. to improve fake news detection. We performed a series of experiments on a new dataset gathered during the COVID-19 pandemic and using Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbor, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine and Random Forest. Random Forest yielded the best results, followed closely by Support Vector Machine, across all setups. In general, both the textual and linguistic features were found to improve fake news detection when used separately, however, combining them into a single model did not improve the detection significantly. Differences were also noted between the use of bigrams and part of speech tags. The study shows that textual and linguistic features can be used successfully in detecting fake news using the traditional machine learning approach as opposed to deep learning.
Related papers
- CrossNews-UA: A Cross-lingual News Semantic Similarity Benchmark for Ukrainian, Polish, Russian, and English [53.32175252285023]
Cross-lingual news comparison offers a promising approach to verify information.<n>Existing datasets for cross-lingual news analysis were manually curated by journalists and experts.<n>We introduce a scalable, explainable crowdsourcing pipeline for cross-lingual news similarity assessment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-22T14:23:50Z) - Detection of Human and Machine-Authored Fake News in Urdu [2.013675429941823]
Social media has amplified the spread of fake news.
Traditional fake news detection methods relying on linguistic cues become less effective.
We propose a hierarchical detection strategy to improve the accuracy and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T12:42:07Z) - Adapting Fake News Detection to the Era of Large Language Models [48.5847914481222]
We study the interplay between machine-(paraphrased) real news, machine-generated fake news, human-written fake news, and human-written real news.
Our experiments reveal an interesting pattern that detectors trained exclusively on human-written articles can indeed perform well at detecting machine-generated fake news, but not vice versa.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T08:39:45Z) - Multiverse: Multilingual Evidence for Fake News Detection [71.51905606492376]
Multiverse is a new feature based on multilingual evidence that can be used for fake news detection.
The hypothesis of the usage of cross-lingual evidence as a feature for fake news detection is confirmed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T18:24:17Z) - An Emotion-Aware Multi-Task Approach to Fake News and Rumour Detection
using Transfer Learning [13.448658162594603]
We show the correlation between the legitimacy of a text with its intrinsic emotion for fake news and rumour detection.
We propose a multi-task framework for fake news and rumour detection, predicting both the emotion and legitimacy of the text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-22T16:15:25Z) - Faking Fake News for Real Fake News Detection: Propaganda-loaded
Training Data Generation [105.20743048379387]
We propose a novel framework for generating training examples informed by the known styles and strategies of human-authored propaganda.
Specifically, we perform self-critical sequence training guided by natural language inference to ensure the validity of the generated articles.
Our experimental results show that fake news detectors trained on PropaNews are better at detecting human-written disinformation by 3.62 - 7.69% F1 score on two public datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T14:24:19Z) - Development of Fake News Model using Machine Learning through Natural
Language Processing [0.7120858995754653]
We use machine learning algorithms and for identification of fake news.
Simple classification is not completely correct in fake news detection.
With the integration of machine learning and text-based processing, we can detect fake news.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-19T09:26:15Z) - User Preference-aware Fake News Detection [61.86175081368782]
Existing fake news detection algorithms focus on mining news content for deceptive signals.
We propose a new framework, UPFD, which simultaneously captures various signals from user preferences by joint content and graph modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-25T21:19:24Z) - SGG: Spinbot, Grammarly and GloVe based Fake News Detection [6.193231258199234]
Online news portals inadvertently become the cause of spreading false information across the web.
Such malpractices call for a robust automatic fake news detection system.
We propose a robust yet simple fake news detection system, leveraging the tools for paraphrasing, grammar-checking, and word-embedding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-16T08:06:52Z) - Machine Learning Explanations to Prevent Overtrust in Fake News
Detection [64.46876057393703]
This research investigates the effects of an Explainable AI assistant embedded in news review platforms for combating the propagation of fake news.
We design a news reviewing and sharing interface, create a dataset of news stories, and train four interpretable fake news detection algorithms.
For a deeper understanding of Explainable AI systems, we discuss interactions between user engagement, mental model, trust, and performance measures in the process of explaining.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-24T05:42:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.