A Self-Healing Framework for Reliable LLM-Based Autonomous Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06737v1
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 13:10:41 GMT
- Title: A Self-Healing Framework for Reliable LLM-Based Autonomous Agents
- Abstract summary: This paper proposes a reliability-aware self-healing framework for LLM-based software agents.<n>The proposed framework was implemented in a multi-agent workflow environment and evaluated using real-world task scenarios.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Autonomous agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being utilized in complex software systems. However, reliability remains a significant challenge due to unpredictable failures such as hallucinations, execution errors, and inconsistent reasoning. This paper proposes a reliability-aware self-healing framework for LLM-based software agents. The framework integrates failure detection, reliability assessment, and automated recovery mechanisms. First, we define a taxonomy of failure types and introduce a quantitative reliability assessment model. Next, we propose a failure detection method that identifies abnormal agent behavior based on execution patterns and output consistency. Finally, we design a self-healing mechanism that dynamically recovers from failures through adaptive replanning and corrective prompting strategies. The proposed framework was implemented in a multi-agent workflow environment and evaluated using real-world task scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly increases task success rates, reduces failure propagation, and enhances overall system robustness compared to existing methods. In particular, this study distinguishes itself by establishing an integrated monitoring system that combines the agent's internal reasoning process with external execution results. These findings are expected to contribute to securing the stability of advanced autonomous systems and lowering the barriers to LLM adoption in production environments.
Related papers
- VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems [79.51005192758262]
Large language model-driven multi-agent systems excel at complex tasks.<n>However, unreliable agents remain a key bottleneck to system-level reliability.<n>We propose a hypothesis verification framework for agent failure attribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T14:09:35Z) - FAMA: Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic Framework for Open-Source LLMs in Interactive Tool Use Environments [60.3427704389541]
Large Language Models are being increasingly deployed as the decision-making core of autonomous agents.<n>Yet, in conversational benchmarks, these agents frequently fail due to the cascading effects of incorrect decision-making.<n>We present the Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic framework to tackle these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-28T02:21:53Z) - Automated Self-Testing as a Quality Gate: Evidence-Driven Release Management for LLM Applications [51.56484100374058]
We present an automated self-testing framework that introduces quality gates with evidence-based release decisions.<n>We evaluate the framework through a longitudinal case study of an internally deployed multi-agent conversational AI system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-13T20:44:15Z) - Managing Uncertainty in LLM-based Multi-Agent System Operation [4.565220771764574]
We propose a lifecycle-based uncertainty management framework for safety-critical multi-agent software systems.<n>We demonstrate the feasibility of the framework using a real-world LLM-based multi-agent echocardiographic software system developed in clinical collaboration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-26T13:49:16Z) - MAS-FIRE: Fault Injection and Reliability Evaluation for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems [38.44649280816596]
We propose MAS-FIRE, a systematic framework for fault injection and reliability evaluation of Multi-Agent Systems.<n>We define a taxonomy of 15 fault types covering intra-agent cognitive errors and inter-agent coordination failures.<n>Applying MAS-FIRE to three representative MAS architectures, we uncover a rich set of fault-tolerant behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-23T13:47:43Z) - AgentFixer: From Failure Detection to Fix Recommendations in LLM Agentic Systems [7.429835301272413]
The framework includes fifteen failure-detection tools and two root-cause analysis modules.<n>It integrates lightweight rule-based checks with LLM-as-a-judge assessments to support structured incident detection, classification, and repair.<n>We applied the framework to IBM CUGA, evaluating its performance on the AppWorld and WebArena benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-18T14:55:35Z) - ProbeLLM: Automating Principled Diagnosis of LLM Failures [89.44131968886184]
We propose ProbeLLM, a benchmark-agnostic automated probing framework that elevates weakness discovery from individual failures to structured failure modes.<n>By restricting probing to verifiable test cases and leveraging tool-augmented generation and verification, ProbeLLM grounds failure discovery in reliable evidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T14:33:13Z) - Agentic Confidence Calibration [67.50096917021521]
Holistic Trajectory (HTC) is a novel diagnostic framework for AI agents.<n>HTC consistently surpasses strong baselines in both calibration and discrimination.<n>HTC provides interpretability by revealing the signals behind failure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-22T09:08:25Z) - SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z) - Failure Modes in LLM Systems: A System-Level Taxonomy for Reliable AI Applications [0.0]
Large language models (LLMs) are being rapidly integrated into decision-support tools, automation, and AI-enabled software systems.<n>This paper presents a system-level taxonomy of fifteen hidden failure modes that arise in real-world LLM applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-25T05:19:23Z) - Enhancing LLM Reliability via Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling [41.19330514054401]
Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucination stemming from misaligned self-awareness.<n>We propose the Explicit Knowledge Boundary Modeling framework to integrate fast and slow reasoning systems to harmonize reliability and usability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T03:16:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.