Conformal Agent Error Attribution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06788v1
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 18:00:07 GMT
- Title: Conformal Agent Error Attribution
- Abstract summary: This paper presents a framework for error attribution based on conformal prediction (CP)<n>We introduce new algorithms for filtration-based CP designed for sequential data such as agent trajectories.<n>Our overall approach is model-agnostic, and offers a principled uncertainty layer for MAS error attribution.
- Score: 12.400746451700945
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: When multi-agent systems (MAS) fail, identifying where the decisive error occurred is the first step for automated recovery to an earlier state. Error attribution remains a fundamental challenge due to the long interaction traces that large language model-based MAS generate. This paper presents a framework for error attribution based on conformal prediction (CP) which provides finite-sample, distribution-free coverage guarantees. We introduce new algorithms for filtration-based CP designed for sequential data such as agent trajectories. Unlike existing CP algorithms, our approach predicts sets that are contiguous sequences to enable efficient recovery and debugging. We verify our theoretical guarantees on a variety of agents and datasets, show that errors can be precisely isolated, then use prediction sets to rollback MAS to correct their own errors. Our overall approach is model-agnostic, and offers a principled uncertainty layer for MAS error attribution. We release code at https://github.com/layer6ai-labs/conformal-agent-error-attribution.
Related papers
- VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems [79.51005192758262]
Large language model-driven multi-agent systems excel at complex tasks.<n>However, unreliable agents remain a key bottleneck to system-level reliability.<n>We propose a hypothesis verification framework for agent failure attribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T14:09:35Z) - Metacognitive Self-Correction for Multi-Agent System via Prototype-Guided Next-Execution Reconstruction [58.51530390018909]
Large Language Model based multi-agent systems excel at collaborative problem solving but remain brittle to cascading errors.<n>We present MASC, a metacognitive framework that endows MAS with real-time, unsupervised, step-level error detection and self-correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T05:35:37Z) - Revisiting Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Missing Values [65.30332997607141]
Missing values are common in real-world time series.<n>Current approaches have developed an imputation-then-prediction framework that uses imputation modules to fill in missing values, followed by forecasting on the imputed data.<n>This framework overlooks a critical issue: there is no ground truth for the missing values, making the imputation process susceptible to errors that can degrade prediction accuracy.<n>We introduce Consistency-Regularized Information Bottleneck (CRIB), a novel framework built on the Information Bottleneck principle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-27T20:57:48Z) - Abduct, Act, Predict: Scaffolding Causal Inference for Automated Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems [20.846301581161978]
Failure attribution in multi-agent systems is a critical yet unsolved challenge.<n>Current methods treat this as a pattern recognition task over long conversation logs.<n>A2P Scaffolding transforms failure attribution from pattern recognition into a structured causal inference task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-12T16:51:15Z) - Consistency-based Abductive Reasoning over Perceptual Errors of Multiple Pre-trained Models in Novel Environments [5.5855749614100825]
This paper addresses the hypothesis that leveraging multiple pre-trained models can mitigate this recall reduction.<n>We formulate the challenge of identifying and managing conflicting predictions from various models as a consistency-based abduction problem.<n>Our results validate the use of consistency-based abduction as an effective mechanism to robustly integrate knowledge from multiple imperfect models in challenging, novel scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-25T23:17:47Z) - A Universal Error Measure for Input Predictions Applied to Online Graph
Problems [57.58926849872494]
We introduce a novel measure for quantifying the error in input predictions.
The measure captures errors due to absent predicted requests as well as unpredicted actual requests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-25T15:24:03Z) - Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions.
In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data.
We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z) - Tail-to-Tail Non-Autoregressive Sequence Prediction for Chinese
Grammatical Error Correction [49.25830718574892]
We present a new framework named Tail-to-Tail (textbfTtT) non-autoregressive sequence prediction.
Considering that most tokens are correct and can be conveyed directly from source to target, and the error positions can be estimated and corrected.
Experimental results on standard datasets, especially on the variable-length datasets, demonstrate the effectiveness of TtT in terms of sentence-level Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-Measure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-03T05:56:57Z) - Generalizing Variational Autoencoders with Hierarchical Empirical Bayes [6.273154057349038]
We present Hierarchical Empirical Bayes Autoencoder (HEBAE), a computationally stable framework for probabilistic generative models.
Our key contributions are two-fold. First, we make gains by placing a hierarchical prior over the encoding distribution, enabling us to adaptively balance the trade-off between minimizing the reconstruction loss function and avoiding over-regularization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-20T18:18:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.