An Interpretable and Scalable Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07046v1
• Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 23:52:12 GMT
• Title: An Interpretable and Scalable Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Evaluation of large language models (LLMs) is increasingly critical, yet standard benchmarking methods rely on average accuracy.<n>Items Response Theory (IRT) offers a principled framework for modeling latent model abilities and item characteristics.<n>We propose an interpretable and scalable framework for LLM evaluation based on the majorization-minimization principle.
• Score: 13.322241501687715
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluation of large language models (LLMs) is increasingly critical, yet standard benchmarking methods rely on average accuracy, overlooking both the inherent stochasticity of LLM outputs and the heterogeneity of benchmark items. Item Response Theory (IRT) offers a principled framework for modeling latent model abilities and item characteristics, but conventional methods are computationally expensive and numerically unstable, limiting large-scale implementations. To address these challenges, we propose an interpretable and scalable framework for LLM evaluation based on the majorization-minimization principle. Our approach reformulates the problem as a sequence of constrained matrix factorization subproblems, enabling stable and efficient parameter estimation with theoretical guarantees for identifiability and convergence. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, including MATH-500 and six Open LLM Leaderboard benchmarks, demonstrate that our method achieves superior scalability and interpretability. It delivers orders-of-magnitude speedups over competing methods while maintaining comparable or even higher estimation accuracy. Our results align with established scaling laws and offer insights into item difficulty and discrimination, informing more principled benchmark design.

Related papers

• Programmatic Context Augmentation for LLM-based Symbolic Regression [65.01826333382738]
  Large language model (LLM)-based evolutionary search methods have been introduced into Symbolic regression.<n>We propose a novel LLM-based evolutionary search framework that incorporates programmatic context augmentation.<n>By enabling code-based interactions with the dataset, our method can actively perform data analysis and extract informative signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T19:34:03Z)
• Scalable Text-Embedding-informed Cognitive Diagnosis of Large Language Models [4.86897953445012]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on diverse benchmarks.<n>Existing evaluation practices largely rely on coarse summary metrics that obscure underlying reasoning abilities.<n>We propose novel methodologies to adapt cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) in psychometrics to LLM evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T00:14:47Z)
• RankLLM: Weighted Ranking of LLMs by Quantifying Question Difficulty [102.02839046225468]
  RankLLM is a novel framework designed to quantify both question difficulty and model competency.<n>We evaluate 30 models on 35,550 questions across multiple domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T21:28:46Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Characterizing Code Comprehension Capabilities in (Large) Language Models [4.841487377596519]
  This paper investigates whether Large Language Models' code-comprehension performance aligns with traditional human-centric software metrics.<n>We introduce a diagnostic framework that reframes code understanding as a binary input-output consistency task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T10:58:24Z)
• Principled Algorithms for Optimizing Generalized Metrics in Binary Classification [53.604375124674796]
  We introduce principled algorithms for optimizing generalized metrics, supported by $H$-consistency and finite-sample generalization bounds.<n>Our approach reformulates metric optimization as a generalized cost-sensitive learning problem.<n>We develop new algorithms, METRO, with strong theoretical performance guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T01:33:42Z)
• ReasonBENCH: Benchmarking the (In)Stability of LLM Reasoning [2.1461777157838724]
  We introduce ReasonBENCH, the first benchmark designed to quantify the underlying instability in large language models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>Across tasks from different domains, we find that the vast majority of reasoning strategies and models exhibit high instability.<n>We further analyze the impact of prompts, model families, and scale on the trade-off between solve rate and stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-08T18:26:58Z)
• Principled RL for Diffusion LLMs Emerges from a Sequence-Level Perspective [85.06838178922791]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven highly effective for autoregressive language models.<n>But adapting these methods to diffusion large language models (dLLMs) presents fundamental challenges.<n>We propose a principled RL framework that treats entire sequence generation as a single action and uses the ELBO as a tractable sequence-level likelihood proxy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T13:05:32Z)
• STEM: Efficient Relative Capability Evaluation of LLMs through Structured Transition Samples [3.41981716024098]
  evaluating large language models (LLMs) has become increasingly challenging as model capabilities advance rapidly.<n>We propose the textbfStructured textbfTransition textbfEvaluation textbfMethod (STEM) as a lightweight and interpretable evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T16:36:43Z)
• Model Utility Law: Evaluating LLMs beyond Performance through Mechanism Interpretable Metric [99.56567010306807]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become indispensable across academia, industry, and daily applications.<n>One core challenge of evaluation in the large language model (LLM) era is the generalization issue.<n>We propose Model Utilization Index (MUI), a mechanism interpretability enhanced metric that complements traditional performance scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T04:09:47Z)
• Beyond the Singular: The Essential Role of Multiple Generations in Effective Benchmark Evaluation and Analysis [10.133537818749291]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant utilities in real-world applications.<n> Benchmark evaluations are crucial for assessing the capabilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T03:43:33Z)
• Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding for Efficient LLM Reasoning [80.55186052123196]
  We introduce Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding (RSD), a novel framework aimed at improving the efficiency of inference in large language models (LLMs)<n>RSD incorporates a controlled bias to prioritize high-reward outputs, in contrast to existing speculative decoding methods that enforce strict unbiasedness.<n>RSD delivers significant efficiency gains against decoding with the target model only, while achieving significant better accuracy than parallel decoding method on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T17:19:57Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.