Query-efficient model evaluation using cached responses
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07096v1
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 01:24:06 GMT
- Title: Query-efficient model evaluation using cached responses
- Abstract summary: We introduce an approach for predicting benchmark performance that leverages cached model responses based on the Data Kernel Perspective Space (DKPS)<n>We demonstrate that DKPS-based methods achieve the same mean absolute error as baselines with a substantially decreased query budget.<n>We conclude by proposing an offline method for selecting a set of queries that maximizes the goodness-of-fit on reference models.
- Score: 0.2994962964425238
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Evaluating a new model on an existing benchmark is often necessary to understand its behavior before deployment. For modern evaluation frameworks, generating and evaluating a response for all queries can be prohibitively expensive. In practice, responses from previously-evaluated models are often cached -- creating a potential opportunity to use this additional information to decrease the number of queries required to accurately evaluate a new model. In this paper, we introduce an approach for predicting benchmark performance that leverages cached model responses based on the Data Kernel Perspective Space (DKPS), a method for quantifying the relationship between models in the black-box setting. Theoretically, we show that DKPS-based methods are query-efficient under certain conditions. Empirically, we demonstrate that DKPS-based methods achieve the same mean absolute error as baselines with a substantially decreased query budget. We conclude by proposing an offline method for selecting a set of queries that maximizes the goodness-of-fit on reference models, improving prediction accuracy over random query selection.
Related papers
- CollabEval: Statistically Efficient Collaborative Model Evaluation via Matrix Completion [65.53153291902454]
Collaborative Evaluation (CollabEval) is a simple, effective, and principled method for exploiting dependencies between historical runs of different models on the same tasks to improve statistical efficiency.<n>We build a low-rank approximation of the score matrix, and use the reconstructed values to guarantee unbiased estimates of the true evaluation metric mean.<n>We find that CollabEval substantially reduces the mean confidence interval size, and the mean squared error of the point estimate, compared to baseline methods at the same annotation budget.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-06T13:22:04Z) - TopBench: A Benchmark for Implicit Prediction and Reasoning over Tabular Question Answering [80.93487993878836]
A common class of real-world queries is implicitly predictive, requiring the inference of unobserved answers from historical patterns rather than mere retrieval.<n>These queries introduce two challenges: recognizing latent intent and reliable predictive reasoning over massive tables.<n>We introduce TopBench, a benchmark consisting of 779 samples across four sub-tasks, ranging from single-point prediction to decision making, treatment effect analysis, and complex reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-30T16:22:51Z) - IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation [85.56193980646981]
We propose IF-RewardBench, a comprehensive meta-evaluation benchmark for instruction-following.<n>For each instruction, we construct a preference graph containing all pairwise preferences among multiple responses.<n>Experiments on IF-RewardBench reveal significant deficiencies in current judge models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T02:21:17Z) - LOCUS: Low-Dimensional Model Embeddings for Efficient Model Exploration, Comparison, and Selection [15.182368486530128]
We propose LOCUS, a method that produces low-dimensional vector embeddings that compactly represent a language model's capabilities across queries.<n>LOCUS is an attention-based approach that generates embeddings by a deterministic forward pass over query encodings and evaluation scores via an encoder model.<n>We train a correctness predictor that uses model embeddings and query encodings to achieve state-of-the-art routing accuracy on unseen queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-28T22:09:42Z) - CoLSE: A Lightweight and Robust Hybrid Learned Model for Single-Table Cardinality Estimation using Joint CDF [7.945011337356916]
Cardinality estimation is a critical component of query optimization.<n>We propose CoLSE, a hybrid learned approach for single-table cardinality estimation.<n> Experimental results show that CoLSE achieves a favorable trade-off among accuracy, training time, latency, and model size, outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-14T10:08:20Z) - HuggingR$^{4}$: A Progressive Reasoning Framework for Discovering Optimal Model Companions [50.61510609116118]
HuggingR$4$ is a novel framework that combines Reasoning, Retrieval, Refinement, and Reflection to efficiently select models.<n>It attains a workability rate of 92.03% and a reasonability rate of 82.46%, surpassing existing method by 26.51% and 33.25% respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-24T03:13:45Z) - Scales++: Compute Efficient Evaluation Subset Selection with Cognitive Scales Embeddings [23.9553588103042]
We propose a item-centric approach to benchmark subset selection, arguing that selection should be based on the intrinsic properties of the task items themselves.<n>We show Scales++ reduces the upfront selection cost by over 18x while achieving competitive predictive fidelity.<n>We demonstrate that this item-centric approach enables more efficient model evaluation without significant fidelity degradation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-30T11:28:58Z) - Maximally-Informative Retrieval for State Space Model Generation [59.954191072042526]
We introduce Retrieval In-Context Optimization (RICO) to minimize model uncertainty for a particular query at test-time.<n>Unlike traditional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which relies on externals for document retrieval, our approach leverages direct feedback from the model.<n>We show that standard top-$k$ retrieval with model gradients can approximate our optimization procedure, and provide connections to the leave-one-out loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-13T18:08:54Z) - Value-Guided Search for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [49.971608979012366]
We propose a simple and efficient method for value model training on long-context reasoning traces.<n>By collecting a dataset of 2.5 million reasoning traces, we train a 1.5B token-level value model.<n>We find that block-wise value-guided search (VGS) with a final weighted majority vote achieves better test-time scaling than standard methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T01:05:07Z) - Causal LLM Routing: End-to-End Regret Minimization from Observational Data [3.3580884064577616]
LLM routing aims to select the most appropriate model for each query.<n>Prior approaches typically adopt a decoupled strategy, where the metrics are first predicted and the model is then selected based on these estimates.<n>We propose a causal end-to-end framework that learns routing policies by minimizing decision-making regret from observational data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T21:34:18Z) - Probabilistic Case-based Reasoning for Open-World Knowledge Graph
Completion [59.549664231655726]
A case-based reasoning (CBR) system solves a new problem by retrieving cases' that are similar to the given problem.
In this paper, we demonstrate that such a system is achievable for reasoning in knowledge-bases (KBs)
Our approach predicts attributes for an entity by gathering reasoning paths from similar entities in the KB.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T17:48:12Z) - Monotonic Cardinality Estimation of Similarity Selection: A Deep
Learning Approach [22.958342743597044]
We investigate the possibilities of utilizing deep learning for cardinality estimation of similarity selection.
We propose a novel and generic method that can be applied to any data type and distance function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-15T20:22:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.