Demystifying and Detecting Agentic Workflow Injection Vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07135v1
• Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 02:13:04 GMT
• Title: Demystifying and Detecting Agentic Workflow Injection Vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions
• Abstract summary: GitHub Actions is increasingly used to deploy LLM-based agents for repository-centric tasks.<n>In this paper, we introduce Agentic Injection (AWI), a workflow-level injection flaw.<n>We characterize 1,033 real-world AI-assisted actions and extract AWI-specific specifications.<n>Based on these specifications, we design TaintAWI, a taint-analysis tool that tracks flows from untrusted event context to agent prompt inputs.
• Score: 13.116427545802571
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: GitHub Actions is increasingly used to deploy LLM-based agents for repository-centric tasks such as issue triage, pull-request review, code modification, and release assistance. These agentic workflows extend traditional CI/CD automation with agentic capabilities but also create a new injection surface. In this paper, we introduce Agentic Workflow Injection (AWI), a workflow-level injection flaw where untrusted GitHub event context, such as issue bodies, pull-request descriptions, or comments, is incorporated into agent prompts or agent-consumed inputs and converted into attacker-influenced behavior through agent tools or downstream workflow logic. We identify two core AWI patterns: Prompt-to-Agent (P2A), where untrusted content reaches an agent prompt boundary, and Prompt-to-Script (P2S), where attacker influence propagates through model- or agent-derived outputs into later scripts. We present the first systematic study of AWI in GitHub Actions. We characterize 1,033 real-world AI-assisted actions and extract AWI-specific taint specifications, including prompt boundaries, derived outputs, agentic capabilities, and access-control interfaces. Based on these specifications, we design TaintAWI, a taint-analysis tool that tracks flows from untrusted event context to agent prompt inputs and security-sensitive workflow sinks. Applying TaintAWI to 13,392 real-world agentic workflows from 10,792 repositories, we report 519 potential AWI vulnerabilities, of which 496 are confirmed exploitable under our threat model, yielding a precision of 95.6%. Among them, 343 are previously unknown zero-day vulnerabilities. We prioritized disclosure for 187 zero-day cases, received 26 maintainer responses, and 24 cases have been accepted or fixed at the time of writing.

Related papers

• SIR: Self-improving Red-teaming for Compute Use Agents [71.71987044117371]
  Computer use agents (CUAs) are vision-language models that perceive a screen and act on a real operating system through mouse, keyboard, and terminal.<n>Because they can be exposed to untrusted content while operating, they are vulnerable to indirect prompt injection (IPI)<n>We present SIR, a black box IPI attack that composes stealthy injections from a small library of reusable principles stated in plain language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T03:39:43Z)
• GitInject: Real-World Prompt Injection Attacks in AI-Powered CI/CD Pipelines [22.29523291822444]
  We present GitInject, an open-source framework for evaluating prompt injection vulnerabilities in real, live GitHub.<n>We study workflow configurations across four AI providers and document eleven named attacks spanning config-file injection, credential exfiltration, judgment manipulation, and availability.<n>We find that all tested providers are susceptible to at least one attack class in their default configuration, and that the most critical vulnerabilities are structural.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-07T19:17:18Z)
• Comment and Control: Hijacking Agentic Workflows via Context-Grounded Evolution [13.979573641143212]
  GitHub Actions and n8n integrate Large Language Model (LLM) agents for tasks such as code review and data synchronization.<n>An adversary may control and craft certain inputs, such as GitHub issue comments, to manipulate the LLM agent for unwanted actions.<n>In this paper, we design the first detection and exploitation framework, called JAW, to hijack agentic runtime platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T20:45:31Z)
• AEGIS: No Tool Call Left Unchecked -- A Pre-Execution Firewall and Audit Layer for AI Agents [4.963079926145645]
  AEGIS is a pre-execution firewall and audit layer for AI agents.<n>It interposes on the tool-execution path and applies a three-stage pipeline.<n>High-risk calls can be held for human approval, and all decisions are recorded in a tamper-evident audit trail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T03:49:12Z)
• Agentic Peer-to-Peer Networks: From Content Distribution to Capability and Action Sharing [10.47562113256175]
  This article outlines the networking foundations needed to make such collaboration practical.<n>We propose a plane-based reference architecture that decouples connectivity/identity, semantic discovery, and execution.<n>We also present a textittiered verification spectrum: Tier1 relies on reputation signals, Tier2 applies lightweight canary challenge-response with fallback selection, and Tier3 requires evidence packages such as signed tool receipts/traces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T05:58:44Z)
• AgentSentry: Mitigating Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents via Temporal Causal Diagnostics and Context Purification [25.817251923574286]
  We propose a novel inference-time detection and mitigation framework for large language model (LLM) agents.<n>AgentSentry is the first inference-time defense to model multi-turn IPI as a temporal causal takeover.<n>We evaluate AgentSentry on the textscAgentDojo benchmark across four task suites, three IPI attack families, and multiple black-box LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T07:59:10Z)
• SkillJect: Automating Stealthy Skill-Based Prompt Injection for Coding Agents with Trace-Driven Closed-Loop Refinement [120.52289344734415]
  We propose an automated framework for stealthy prompt injection tailored to agent skills.<n>The framework forms a closed loop with three agents: an Attack Agent that synthesizes injection skills under explicit stealth constraints, a Code Agent that executes tasks using the injected skills and an Evaluate Agent that logs action traces.<n>Our method consistently achieves high attack success rates under realistic settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T16:09:48Z)
• BackdoorAgent: A Unified Framework for Backdoor Attacks on LLM-based Agents [58.83028403414688]
  Large language model (LLM) agents execute tasks through multi-step workflow that combine planning, memory, and tool use.<n>Backdoor triggers injected into specific stages of an agent workflow can persist through multiple intermediate states and adversely influence downstream outputs.<n>We propose textbfBackdoorAgent, a modular and stage-aware framework that provides a unified agent-centric view of backdoor threats in LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T03:49:39Z)
• Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation [87.47155146067962]
  We provide a standardized evaluation harness that orchestrates parallel evaluations across hundreds of tasks.<n>We conduct three-dimensional analysis spanning models, scaffolds, and benchmarks.<n>Our analysis reveals surprising insights, such as higher reasoning effort reducing accuracy in the majority of runs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T22:22:28Z)
• Malice in Agentland: Down the Rabbit Hole of Backdoors in the AI Supply Chain [82.98626829232899]
  Fine-tuning AI agents on data from their own interactions introduces a critical security vulnerability within the AI supply chain.<n>We show that adversaries can easily poison the data collection pipeline to embed hard-to-detect backdoors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T12:47:21Z)
• AgentArmor: Enforcing Program Analysis on Agent Runtime Trace to Defend Against Prompt Injection [14.522205401511727]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents offer a powerful new paradigm for solving various problems by combining natural language reasoning with the execution of external tools.<n>In this work, we propose a novel insight that treats the agent runtime traces as structured programs with analyzable semantics.<n>We present AgentArmor, a program analysis framework that converts agent traces into graph intermediate representation-based structured program dependency representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T07:59:34Z)
• AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents [54.29555239363013]
  We propose a generic black-box fuzzing framework, AgentVigil, to automatically discover and exploit indirect prompt injection vulnerabilities.<n>We evaluate AgentVigil on two public benchmarks, AgentDojo and VWA-adv, where it achieves 71% and 70% success rates against agents based on o3-mini and GPT-4o.<n>We apply our attacks in real-world environments, successfully misleading agents to navigate to arbitrary URLs, including malicious sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:40:17Z)
• SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
  SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.