A Comprehensive Survey on Agent Skills: Taxonomy, Techniques, and Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07358v1
• Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 07:10:26 GMT
• Title: A Comprehensive Survey on Agent Skills: Taxonomy, Techniques, and Applications
• Abstract summary: Large language model (LLM)-based agents that reason, plan, and act through tools, memory, and structured interaction are emerging as a promising paradigm for automating complex tasks.<n>Yet as agents move toward open-ended, real-world deployment, relying on from-scratch reasoning and low-level tool calls for every task become increasingly inefficient, error-prone, and hard to maintain.<n>This survey examines this challenge through the lens of emphagent skills, which we define as reusable procedural artifacts that coordinate tools, memory, and runtime context under task-specific constraints.
• Score: 18.01291032624805
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based agents that reason, plan, and act through tools, memory, and structured interaction are emerging as a promising paradigm for automating complex workflows. Recent systems such as OpenClaw and Claude Code exemplify a broader shift from passive response generation to action-oriented task execution. Yet as agents move toward open-ended, real-world deployment, relying on from-scratch reasoning and low-level tool calls for every task become increasingly inefficient, error-prone, and hard to maintain. This survey examines this challenge through the lens of \emph{agent skills}, which we define as reusable procedural artifacts that coordinate tools, memory, and runtime context under task-specific constraints. Under this view, agents and skills play complementary roles: agents handle high-level reasoning and planning, while skills form the operational layer that enables reliable, reusable, and composable execution. Skills are therefore central to the scalability, robustness, and maintainability of modern agent systems. We organize the literature around four stages of the agent skill lifecycle -- representation, acquisition, retrieval, and evolution -- and review representative methods, ecosystem resources, and application settings across each stage. We conclude by discussing open challenges in quality control, interoperability, safe updating, and long-term capability management. All related resources, including research papers, open-source data, and projects, are collected for the community in \textcolor{blue}{https://github.com/JayLZhou/Awesome-Agent-Skills}.

Related papers

• Agents in the Large: Perception-Centered Architecture for Persistent Agents [66.30987129595137]
  We propose a Perception-Centered Architecture for Persistent Agents (Pera)<n>Pera describes a persistent agent organized around perception and control components that continually perceive service-relevant signals.<n>We use Pera to retrospectively organize recent work, examine a detailed case study, and offer forward-looking insights for building more capable persistent agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T09:04:52Z)
• Graph Engineering in the Era of LLM Agents: From Individual Intelligence to System Intelligence [115.91847478507736]
  LLMs have evolved from language generators to autonomous agents capable of complex, long-horizon tasks.<n>Many tasks require heterogeneous expertise, interdependent subtasks, parallel execution, independent verification, and persistent state.<n>We call this System Intelligence: an agent system's ability to organize and coordinate multiple intelligent components into a coherent, adaptive whole.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T14:27:57Z)
• DocOps: A Verifiable Benchmark for Autonomous Agents in Complex Document Operations [106.74348504930124]
  We introduce DocOps, a deterministically verifiable evaluation framework underpinned by a hierarchical taxonomy.<n>Based on DocOps, we systematically evaluate representative closed- and open-source models across various agentic harnesses.<n>Our work exposes the capability boundaries of agents in maintaining global document consistency, shedding light on the future design of robust, non-destructive agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-22T07:52:59Z)
• From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Design [67.8241530947325]
  This survey examines LLM-based agents through a model-harness lens.<n>We first clarify the functional definition of agents and the implementation view of an LLM-based agent as a foundation model and an execution harness.<n>We then analyze the limits of model-centric scaling, trace four paradigms of agent engineering, and decompose the execution harness into six coupled runtime responsibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-14T05:40:16Z)
• Code as Agent Harness [107.31925305395957]
  In emerging agentic systems, code is no longer only a target output.<n>Code increasingly serves as an operational substrate for agent reasoning, acting, environment modeling, and execution-based verification.<n>This survey provides a unified roadmap toward executable, verifiable, and stateful AI agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T17:59:03Z)
• SoK: Agentic Skills -- Beyond Tool Use in LLM Agents [6.356997609995175]
  Agentic systems increasingly rely on reusable procedural capabilities, textita.k.a., agentic skills, to execute long-horizon reliably.<n>This paper maps the skill layer across the full lifecycle (discovery, practice, distillation, storage, composition, evaluation, and update)<n>We analyze the security and governance implications of skill-based agents, covering supply-chain risks, prompt injection via skill payloads, and trust-tiered execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T13:11:38Z)
• Agent Skills for Large Language Models: Architecture, Acquisition, Security, and the Path Forward [5.124116559484265]
  The transition from monolithic language models to modular, skill-equipped agents marks a defining shift in how large language models (LLMs) are deployed in practice.<n>Rather than encoding all procedural knowledge within model weights, agent skills enable dynamic capability extension without retraining.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive treatment of the agent skills landscape, as it has rapidly evolved during the last few months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T21:33:25Z)
• AgentIF-OneDay: A Task-level Instruction-Following Benchmark for General AI Agents in Daily Scenarios [49.90735676070039]
  The capacity of AI agents to effectively handle tasks of increasing duration and complexity continues to grow.<n>We argue that current evaluations prioritize increasing task difficulty without sufficiently addressing the diversity of agentic tasks.<n>We propose AgentIF-OneDay, aimed at determining whether general users can utilize natural language instructions and AI agents to complete a diverse array of daily tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T13:49:18Z)
• AI Agent Systems: Architectures, Applications, and Evaluation [4.967019713320407]
  AI agents combine foundation models with reasoning, planning, memory, and tool use.<n>We organize prior work into a unified taxonomy spanning agent components.<n>We discuss key design trade-offs -- latency vs. accuracy, autonomy vs. controllability, and capability vs. reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T02:38:40Z)
• Autonomous Data Agents: A New Opportunity for Smart Data [50.02229219403014]
  Report argues that DataAgents represent a paradigm shift toward autonomous data-to-knowledge systems.<n>DataAgents transform complex and unstructured data into coherent and actionable knowledge.<n>We first examine why the convergence of agentic AI and data-to-knowledge systems has emerged as a critical trend.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T06:46:41Z)
• A Survey on Agent Workflow -- Status and Future [2.817843718857682]
  This survey provides a comprehensive review of agent workflow systems.<n>We classify existing systems along two key dimensions: functional capabilities and architectural features.<n>We highlight common patterns, potential technical challenges, and emerging trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T04:15:30Z)
• A Survey on Complex Tasks for Goal-Directed Interactive Agents [60.53915548970061]
  This survey compiles relevant tasks and environments for evaluating goal-directed interactive agents. An up-to-date compilation of relevant resources can be found on our project website.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T08:17:53Z)
• TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
  We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation. Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed. Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.