DocOps: A Verifiable Benchmark for Autonomous Agents in Complex Document Operations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19865v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:52:59 GMT
• Title: DocOps: A Verifiable Benchmark for Autonomous Agents in Complex Document Operations
• Abstract summary: We introduce DocOps, a deterministically verifiable evaluation framework underpinned by a hierarchical taxonomy.<n>Based on DocOps, we systematically evaluate representative closed- and open-source models across various agentic harnesses.<n>Our work exposes the capability boundaries of agents in maintaining global document consistency, shedding light on the future design of robust, non-destructive agents.
• Score: 106.74348504930124
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As autonomous agents rapidly evolve, their ability to reliably manipulate ubiquitous digital documents has become critical for enabling general-purpose AI assistants and automating complex workspace workflows. In this paper, we introduce DocOps, a deterministically verifiable evaluation framework underpinned by a hierarchical taxonomy that deconstructs document operations inspired by real-world practices into atomic dimensions and escalating workflow complexities. Based on DocOps, we systematically evaluate representative closed- and open-source models across various agentic harnesses, revealing that even the most advanced frontier configurations still exhibit profound limitations when handling highly coupled, long-range tasks. Furthermore, a fine-grained analysis of existing agents' manipulation behaviors uncovers 3 key failure modes: long-term state tracking collapse, shallow semantic verification, and destructive editing of structural metadata. Ultimately, our work exposes the capability boundaries of agents in maintaining global document consistency, shedding light on the future design of robust, non-destructive agents for complex digital ecosystems.

Related papers

• DuMateBench: Evaluating Autonomous Agents in Complex Real-World Workflows [69.12339622053588]
  We introduce DuMateBench, a real-session benchmark reconstructed from anonymized and privacy-screened user sessions.<n>The resulting benchmark comprises 200 tasks spanning 8 broad scenarios and 17 fine-grained capability categories.<n>We execute these tasks in isolated Docker containers injected with three forms of real-world environmental complexity: Insufficient, Unstable, and Noisy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T02:36:23Z)
• ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step [74.83535434786145]
  We introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning.<n>The benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T15:07:46Z)
• DocOS: Towards Proactive Document-Guided Actions in GUI Agents [54.27655693145045]
  textbfDocOS is a benchmark designed to assess document-guided problem solving in fully interactive environments.<n>Experiments reveal that agents struggle to reliably locate relevant information during proactive search and frequently fail to faithfully ground retrieved instructions into precise actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T08:36:04Z)
• Experience-Driven Multi-Agent Systems Are Training-free Context-aware Earth Observers [27.817039954088315]
  We introduce textbfGeoEvolver, a self-evolving multi-agent system for learning tool-level expertise.<n>We show that GeoEvolver consistently improves end-to-end task success, with an average gain of 12% across multiple backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T15:11:07Z)
• Yunque DeepResearch Technical Report [12.184074646161223]
  Yunque DeepResearch is a hierarchical, modular, and robust framework for deep research.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art performance across a range of agentic deep research benchmarks.<n>We open-source the framework, reproducible implementations, and application cases to empower the community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T13:10:00Z)
• DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing [53.85037373860246]
  We introduce Deep Synth-Eval, a benchmark designed to objectively evaluate information consolidation capabilities.<n>We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol using General Checklists (for factual coverage) and Constraint Checklists (for structural organization)<n>Our results demonstrate that agentic plan-and-write significantly outperform single-turn generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T03:07:52Z)
• Synthesizing Procedural Memory: Challenges and Architectures in Automated Workflow Generation [0.5599792629509229]
  This paper operationalizes the transition of Large Language Models from passive tool-users to active workflow architects.<n>We demonstrate that by enforcing a scientific methodology of hypothesize, probe, and code, agents can autonomously write robust, production-grade code skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T11:33:32Z)
• Designing Domain-Specific Agents via Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism [61.01709143437043]
  We introduce a novel agent design framework centered on a Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism (HTAM)<n>Specifically, HTAM moves beyond emulating social roles, instead structuring multi-agent systems into a logical hierarchy that mirrors the intrinsic task-dependency graph of a given domain.<n>We instantiate this framework as EarthAgent, a multi-agent system tailored for complex geospatial analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T12:25:47Z)
• Build Your Personalized Research Group: A Multiagent Framework for Continual and Interactive Science Automation [41.659285482346235]
  We present texttfreephdlabor, an open-source multiagent framework featuring textitfully dynamic determined by real-time agent reasoning.<n>The framework provides comprehensive infrastructure including textitautomatic context compaction, textitworkspace-based communication to prevent information degradation, textitmemory persistence across sessions, and textitnon-blocking human intervention mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T13:13:32Z)
• Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap [109.53237992384872]
  Deep Research (DR) agents are designed to tackle complex, multi-turn informational research tasks.<n>In this paper, we conduct a detailed analysis of the foundational technologies and architectural components that constitute DR agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T16:52:48Z)
• DocAgent: A Multi-Agent System for Automated Code Documentation Generation [7.653779364214401]
  We introduce DocAgent, a novel multi-agent collaborative system using topological code processing for incremental context building.<n>Specialized agents (Reader, Searcher, Writer, Verifier, Orchestrator) then collaboratively generate documentation.<n>We also propose a multi-faceted evaluation framework assessing Completeness, Helpfulness, and Truthfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T17:50:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.