RelAgent: LLM Agents as Data Scientists for Relational Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07840v1
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 15:06:12 GMT
- Title: RelAgent: LLM Agents as Data Scientists for Relational Learning
- Abstract summary: RelAgent is a relational database-based autonomous scientist for learning.<n>It operates in two phases: the search phase and the inference phase.<n>Features are human-readable, and predictions depend on the resulting query-defined feature map.
- Score: 16.494534572858125
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Relational learning is a challenging problem that has motivated a wide range of approaches, including graph-based models (e.g., graph neural networks, graph transformers), tabular methods (e.g., tabular foundation models), and sequence-based approaches (e.g., large language models), each with its own advantages and limitations. We propose RelAgent, an LLM-based autonomous data scientist for relational learning, which operates in two phases. In the search phase, an LLM agent uses database, validation, and evaluation workspace tools to construct SQL feature programs and select a predictive model. In the inference phase, the resulting program is executed without further LLM calls. The final predictor consists of SQL queries and a classical model, enabling fast, deterministic, and intrinsically interpretable predictions: features are human-readable queries, and predictions depend only on the resulting query-defined feature map, enabling scalable deployment using standard database systems.
Related papers
- Are Large Language Models Suitable for Graph Computation? Progress and Prospects [31.182390464506053]
Large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly explored for graph computation.<n>We provide a comprehensive review of LLMs for graph computation through a role-based taxonomy.<n>Our review indicates that LLMs are promising for simple, small-scale tasks, but remain unreliable for large-scale and exactness-demanding tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-05T03:24:38Z) - LLM/Agent-as-Data-Analyst: A Survey [54.08761322298559]
Large language models (LLMs) and agent techniques have brought a fundamental shift in the functionality and development paradigm of data analysis tasks.<n>LLMs enable complex data understanding, natural language, semantic analysis functions, and autonomous pipeline orchestration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T17:31:38Z) - Towards Efficient Multi-LLM Inference: Characterization and Analysis of LLM Routing and Hierarchical Techniques [14.892995952768352]
Language Models (LMs) have excelled at tasks like text generation, summarization, and question answering.<n>Their inference remains computationally expensive and energy intensive in settings with limited hardware, power, or bandwidth.<n>Recent approaches have introduced multi LLM intelligent model selection strategies that dynamically allocate computational resources based on query complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T23:13:08Z) - IDA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Interactive Guided Data Analysis [60.32962597618861]
IDA-Bench is a novel benchmark evaluating large language models in multi-round interactive scenarios.<n>Agent performance is judged by comparing its final numerical output to the human-derived baseline.<n>Even state-of-the-art coding agents (like Claude-3.7-thinking) succeed on 50% of the tasks, highlighting limitations not evident in single-turn tests.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T09:37:52Z) - Meta-Statistical Learning: Supervised Learning of Statistical Inference [59.463430294611626]
This work demonstrates that the tools and principles driving the success of large language models (LLMs) can be repurposed to tackle distribution-level tasks.<n>We propose meta-statistical learning, a framework inspired by multi-instance learning that reformulates statistical inference tasks as supervised learning problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T18:04:39Z) - Matchmaker: Self-Improving Large Language Model Programs for Schema Matching [60.23571456538149]
We propose a compositional language model program for schema matching, comprised of candidate generation, refinement and confidence scoring.
Matchmaker self-improves in a zero-shot manner without the need for labeled demonstrations.
Empirically, we demonstrate on real-world medical schema matching benchmarks that Matchmaker outperforms previous ML-based approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T16:34:03Z) - GraphTeam: Facilitating Large Language Model-based Graph Analysis via Multi-Agent Collaboration [31.07238612043854]
GraphTeam consists of five LLM-based agents from three modules, and the agents with different specialities can collaborate to address complex problems.<n>Experiments on six graph analysis benchmarks demonstrate that GraphTeam achieves state-of-the-art performance with an average 25.85% improvement over the best baseline in terms of accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-23T17:02:59Z) - LLM-PQA: LLM-enhanced Prediction Query Answering [7.346989832385652]
This paper introduces LLM-PQA, a novel tool that addresses prediction queries formulated in natural language.
This integration provides users with access to a vast spectrum of heterogeneous data and diverse ML models, facilitating dynamic prediction query answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-02T10:20:35Z) - LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Models [64.5099482021597]
Large language models (LLMs) are capable of selecting the most predictive features, with performance rivaling the standard tools of data science.<n>Our findings suggest that LLMs may be useful not only for selecting the best features for training but also for deciding which features to collect in the first place.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T22:23:40Z) - Large Language Models Can Automatically Engineer Features for Few-Shot Tabular Learning [35.03338699349037]
We propose a novel in-context learning framework, FeatLLM, which employs Large Language Models as feature engineers.
FeatLLM generates high-quality rules, significantly (10% on average) outperforming alternatives such as TabLLM and STUNT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T06:26:08Z) - Evaluating and Explaining Large Language Models for Code Using Syntactic
Structures [74.93762031957883]
This paper introduces ASTxplainer, an explainability method specific to Large Language Models for code.
At its core, ASTxplainer provides an automated method for aligning token predictions with AST nodes.
We perform an empirical evaluation on 12 popular LLMs for code using a curated dataset of the most popular GitHub projects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T18:50:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.