The Limits of AI-Driven Allocation: Optimal Screening under Aleatoric Uncertainty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07979v1
• Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 16:38:58 GMT
• Title: The Limits of AI-Driven Allocation: Optimal Screening under Aleatoric Uncertainty
• Abstract summary: We show how screening and algorithmic targeting should be optimally combined in a two-stage allocation framework.<n>We show that the optimal strategy screens units at the margin of algorithmic allocation, while directly targeting the highest-risk units.<n>We illustrate our framework with applications in income-based social protection programs and humanitarian demining in Colombia.
• Score: 16.186900569675114
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rise of machine learning has shifted targeted resource allocation in policy and humanitarian settings toward algorithmic targeting based on predicted risk scores. This approach is typically cheaper and faster than traditional screening procedures that directly observe the latent vulnerability status through physical verification. Yet, even access to the true conditional vulnerability probability cannot eliminate misallocation: aleatoric uncertainty over individual vulnerability status is irreducible, and probabilistic targeting inevitably misallocates some resources. In this work we study how screening and algorithmic targeting should be optimally combined in a two-stage allocation framework where a screening stage observes true outcomes for a subset of units before a final allocation stage assigns the resource under a fixed coverage budget. We show that the optimal strategy screens units at the margin of algorithmic allocation, while directly targeting the highest-risk units. Furthermore, we empirically characterize when screening and algorithmic targeting act as complements or substitutes: efficiency gains from screening grow as the aleatoric uncertainty in the population increases. We illustrate our framework with applications in income-based social protection programs and humanitarian demining in Colombia, where the tension between screening costs and allocation efficiency is operationally consequential.

Related papers

• Online Fair Division with Budget Constraints [20.176419497210585]
  We study an online variant of discrete fair division under generalized assignment budget constraints.<n>We first show that, without additional structure, no deterministic online algorithm can guarantee any fixed approximation to feasible envy-freeness.<n>We then identify bounded density spread as a structural condition that restores meaningful guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-25T17:53:10Z)
• Aligning Data-Driven Predictors with Allocation: A Decision-Focused Approach to Survival Analysis [52.10284705210197]
  We show that machine learning predictors can yield arbitrarily poor outcomes when used for allocation.<n>We introduce a decision-focused learning approach based on optimizing normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG)<n>We propose a bootstrapping approach to optimize the NDCG of existing survival models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T12:03:22Z)
• Escaping the Diversity Trap in Robotic Manipulation via Anchor-Centric Adaptation [50.23374353859762]
  "Maximizing coverage" by collecting diverse, single-shot demonstrations can be self-defeating due to non-vanishing estimation noise.<n>We formalize this phenomenon as a Coverage--Density Trade-off.<n>We propose Anchor-Centric Adaptation (ACA), a two-stage framework that first stabilizes a policy skeleton through repeated demonstrations at core anchors, then expands coverage to high-risk boundaries via teacher-forced error mining and constrained residual updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T07:35:24Z)
• ODAR: Principled Adaptive Routing for LLM Reasoning via Active Inference [60.958331943869126]
  ODAR-Expert is an adaptive routing framework that optimize the accuracy-efficiency trade-off via principled resource allocation.<n>We show strong and consistent gains, including 98.2% accuracy on MATH and 54.8% on Humanity's Last Exam.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T05:22:01Z)
• Conformal Thinking: Risk Control for Reasoning on a Compute Budget [60.65072883773352]
  Reasoning Large Language Models (LLMs) enable test-time scaling, with dataset-level accuracy improving as the token budget increases.<n>We re-frame the budget setting problem as risk control, limiting the error rate while minimizing compute.<n>Our framework introduces an upper threshold that stops reasoning when the model is confident and a novel lower threshold that preemptively stops unsolvable instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T18:17:22Z)
• Asymptotically Optimal Linear Best Feasible Arm Identification with Fixed Budget [55.938644481736446]
  We introduce a novel algorithm for best feasible arm identification that guarantees an exponential decay in the error probability.<n>We validate our algorithm through comprehensive empirical evaluations across various problem instances with different levels of complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T02:56:26Z)
• PredictaBoard: Benchmarking LLM Score Predictability [50.47497036981544]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail unpredictably.<n>This poses a significant challenge to ensuring their safe deployment.<n>We present PredictaBoard, a novel collaborative benchmarking framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T10:52:38Z)
• Pitfall of Optimism: Distributional Reinforcement Learning by Randomizing Risk Criterion [9.35556128467037]
  We present a novel distributional reinforcement learning algorithm that selects actions by randomizing risk criterion to avoid one-sided tendency on risk. Our theoretical results support that the proposed method does not fall into biased exploration and is guaranteed to converge to an optimal return.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T10:53:04Z)
• Stochastic Direct Search Method for Blind Resource Allocation [6.574808513848414]
  We study direct search (also known as pattern search) methods for linearly constrained and derivative-free optimization. We show that direct search methods achieves finite regret in the deterministic and unconstrained case. We propose a simple extension of direct search that achieves a regret upper-bound of the order of $T2/3$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T07:40:45Z)
• A Risk-Sensitive Approach to Policy Optimization [21.684251937825234]
  Standard deep reinforcement learning (DRL) aims to maximize expected reward, considering collected experiences equally in formulating a policy. We propose a more direct approach whereby risk-sensitive objectives, specified in terms of the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the distribution of full-episode rewards, are optimized. We demonstrate that the use of moderately "pessimistic" risk profiles, which emphasize scenarios where the agent performs poorly, leads to enhanced exploration and a continual focus on addressing deficiencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T00:55:05Z)
• Budgeted Classification with Rejection: An Evolutionary Method with Multiple Objectives [0.0]
  Budgeted, sequential classifiers (BSCs) process inputs through a sequence of partial feature acquisition and evaluation steps. This allows for an efficient evaluation of inputs that prevents unneeded feature acquisition. We propose a problem-specific genetic algorithm to build budgeted, sequential classifiers with confidence-based reject options.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-01T22:05:16Z)
• Selective Classification via One-Sided Prediction [54.05407231648068]
  One-sided prediction (OSP) based relaxation yields an SC scheme that attains near-optimal coverage in the practically relevant high target accuracy regime. We theoretically derive bounds generalization for SC and OSP, and empirically we show that our scheme strongly outperforms state of the art methods in coverage at small error levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:14:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.