A Single Deep Preference-Conditioned Policy for Learning Pareto Coverage Sets
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08946v1
- Date: Sat, 09 May 2026 13:35:50 GMT
- Title: A Single Deep Preference-Conditioned Policy for Learning Pareto Coverage Sets
- Abstract summary: We study the uniqueness and continuity of the preference-to-solution correspondence under nonlinear scalarization.<n>We use smooth Tchebycheff scalarization as a monotone utility to solve the problem.<n>We show that each update is equivalent to solving a Kullback-Leibler-regularized MDP with the previous policy as reference.
- Score: 0.4369550829556578
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Preference-conditioned multi-objective reinforcement learning aims to learn a single policy that captures trade-offs across preferences, but under nonlinear scalarization the uniqueness and continuity of the preference-to-solution correspondence remain unclear. We study this problem in tabular multi-objective Markov decision processes (MDPs) using smooth Tchebycheff scalarization as a monotone utility. Under mild interior conditions on the preference set, we prove that each preference induces a unique Pareto-optimal return vector and that this vector depends Lipschitz-continuously on the preference, providing a principled foundation for preference sweeping toward dense Pareto-front coverage. To compute these targets, we formulate the problem over occupancy measures and derive Concave Mirror Descent Policy Iteration (CMDPI), which achieves an $O(1/k)$ objective-suboptimality rate. We further show that each update is equivalent to solving a Kullback-Leibler-regularized MDP with the previous policy as reference, yielding a policy-iteration interpretation and finite-iterate policy continuity across preferences. We instantiate the update as a deep actor-critic algorithm preserving previous-policy regularization. On eight MO-Gymnasium tasks, it achieves the best average hypervolume rank among recent baselines and strong expected-utility performance. Continuous-control experiments indicate gains beyond the discrete-action setting.
Related papers
- Deterministic Pareto-Optimal Policy Synthesis for Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning [3.960587756853285]
We introduce a novel preference-conditioned Bellman operator, motivated from the Chebyshev scalarization.<n>We show how to extract deterministic policies from these converged Q-estimates.<n> Experimental results validate that our algorithm successfully recovers complex trade-offs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-24T21:28:49Z) - One-Way Policy Optimization for Self-Evolving LLMs [63.8638342097375]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a promising paradigm for scaling reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose One-Way Policy Optimization (OWPO), a method based on the principle of decoupling optimization direction from update magnitude.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that OWPO outperforms strong baselines, including DAPO, OPD, and MOPD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-21T08:25:27Z) - Stochastic MeanFlow Policies: One-Step Generative Control with Entropic Mirror Descent [53.828537014796574]
Online off-policy reinforcement learning (RL) is shaped by two choices: the policy class and the update rule.<n>We propose MeanFlow Policies, a one-step generative policy class that maps noise to actions through a MeanFlow transformation.<n>Across seven MuJoCo benchmarks, S improves over Gaussian and generative baselines while retaining single-step inference efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T15:14:14Z) - Preference Conditioned Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning: Decomposed, Diversity-Driven Policy Optimization [2.595968385299781]
Multi-objective reinforcement learning seeks to learn policies that balance multiple, often conflicting objectives.<n>We introduce $D3PO$, a PPO-based framework that reorganizes multi-objective policy optimization to address these issues directly.<n>$D3PO$ preserves per-objective learning signals through a decomposed optimization pipeline and integrates preferences only after stabilization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-08T01:45:01Z) - Coverage Improvement and Fast Convergence of On-policy Preference Learning [67.36750525893514]
Online on-policy preference learning algorithms for language model alignment can significantly outperform their offline counterparts.<n>We analyze how the sampling policy's coverage evolves throughout on-policy training.<n>We develop principled on-policy schemes for reward distillation in the general function class setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T10:46:06Z) - Improving monotonic optimization in heterogeneous multi-agent reinforcement learning with optimal marginal deterministic policy gradient [18.64288030584699]
heterogeneous multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)<n>Objectively replace the sequentially computed $Q_psi*(s,a_1:i)$ with the Optimal Marginal Q function $phi_psi*(s,a_1:i)$ derived from Q-functions.<n>Generalized Q Critic (GQC) as the critic function, employing pessimistic uncertainty-constrained loss to optimize different Q-value estimations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-14T07:16:01Z) - Convergence and Sample Complexity of First-Order Methods for Agnostic Reinforcement Learning [66.4260157478436]
We study reinforcement learning in the policy learning setting.<n>The goal is to find a policy whose performance is competitive with the best policy in a given class of interest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-06T14:40:05Z) - Importance-Weighted Offline Learning Done Right [16.4989952150404]
We study the problem of offline policy optimization in contextual bandit problems.
The goal is to learn a near-optimal policy based on a dataset of decision data collected by a suboptimal behavior policy.
We show that a simple alternative approach based on the "implicit exploration" estimator of citet2015 yields performance guarantees that are superior in nearly all possible terms to all previous results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-27T16:42:10Z) - Provable Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning [95.00042541409901]
We investigate the problem of offline Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) with human feedback.
We consider the general reward setting where the reward can be defined over the whole trajectory.
We introduce a new single-policy concentrability coefficient, which can be upper bounded by the per-trajectory concentrability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T07:11:26Z) - First-order Policy Optimization for Robust Markov Decision Process [40.2022466644885]
We consider the problem of solving robust Markov decision process (MDP)
MDP involves a set of discounted, finite state, finite action space MDPs with uncertain transition kernels.
For $(mathbfs,mathbfa)$-rectangular uncertainty sets, we establish several structural observations on the robust objective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-21T18:10:28Z) - Optimistic Policy Optimization is Provably Efficient in Non-stationary MDPs [113.8752163061151]
We study episodic reinforcement learning (RL) in non-stationary linear kernel Markov decision processes (MDPs)<n>We propose the underlineperiodically underlinerestarted underlineoptimistic underlinepolicy underlineoptimization algorithm (PROPO)<n>PROPO features two mechanisms: sliding-window-based policy evaluation and periodic-restart-based policy improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T02:33:20Z) - Risk-Sensitive Deep RL: Variance-Constrained Actor-Critic Provably Finds
Globally Optimal Policy [95.98698822755227]
We make the first attempt to study risk-sensitive deep reinforcement learning under the average reward setting with the variance risk criteria.
We propose an actor-critic algorithm that iteratively and efficiently updates the policy, the Lagrange multiplier, and the Fenchel dual variable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-28T05:02:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.