Offline Preference Optimization for Rectified Flow with Noise-Tracked Pairs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09433v1
- Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 09:13:40 GMT
- Title: Offline Preference Optimization for Rectified Flow with Noise-Tracked Pairs
- Abstract summary: We propose Prior Noise-Aware Preference Optimization (PNAPO), an off-policy alignment framework specialized for rectified flow.<n>PNAPO augments preference data by retaining the paired prior noises used to generate each winner/loser image.<n>Experiments on state-of-the-art RF T2I backbones show that PNAPO consistently improves preference metrics while substantially reducing training compute.
- Score: 17.05976471653904
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Existing preference datasets for text-to-image models typically store only the final winner/loser images. This representation is insufficient for rectified flow (RF) models, whose generation is naturally indexed by a specific prior noise sample and follows a nearly straight denoising trajectory. In contrast, prior DPO-style alignment for diffusion models commonly estimates trajectories using an independent forward noising process, which can be mismatched to the true reverse dynamics and introduces unnecessary variance. We propose Prior Noise-Aware Preference Optimization (PNAPO), an off-policy alignment framework specialized for rectified flow. PNAPO augments preference data by retaining the paired prior noises used to generate each winner/loser image, turning the standard (prompt, winner, loser) triplet into a sextuple. Leveraging the straight-line property of RF, we estimate intermediate states via noise-image interpolation, which constrains the trajectory estimation space and yields a tighter surrogate objective for preference optimization. In addition, we introduce a dynamic regularization strategy that adapts the DPO regularization based on (i) the reward gap between winner and loser and (ii) training progress, improving stability and sample efficiency. Experiments on state-of-the-art RF T2I backbones show that PNAPO consistently improves preference metrics while substantially reducing training compute.
Related papers
- Unbiased Alignment for Large Language Models with Noisy Preferences [74.69408994904965]
We present a theoretical framework for unbiased alignment, introducing the Unbiased Reward Model (URM) loss and the Unbiased Direct Preference Optimization (UDPO) loss.<n>By mathematically correcting the distortion induced by preference noise, our novel objectives enable unbiased model training directly from noisy datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-03T12:04:43Z) - Beyond Pairwise Preferences: Listwise Reward-Aware Alignment for Diffusion Models [73.08789211016567]
Diffusion LAIR is a reward-aware listwise preference optimization method for diffusion models.<n>Experiments show it outperforms strong preference optimization baselines on text-to-image generation, compositional generation, and image editing benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T03:09:24Z) - TPMM-DPO: Trajectory-aware Preference-guided Model Merging for Iterative Direct Preference Optimization [0.0]
We propose TPMM-DPO, a trajectory-aware preference-guided model merging method.<n>In contrast to conventional iterative DPO, TPMM-DPO effectively mitigates error accumulation induced by noisy preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-22T09:11:20Z) - Diffusion-APO: Trajectory-Aware Direct Preference Alignment for Video Diffusion Transformers [12.948398661304184]
Diffusion-APO is a trajectory-aware algorithm for aligning video diffusion models with human intent.<n>We introduce a unified and modular RLHF framework that integrates online ranking, half-online anchoring, offline refinement, and distillation-aware drift correction.<n>We demonstrate that Diffusion-APO consistently outperforms standard baselines in visual quality and instruction following.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T09:37:46Z) - wDPO: Winsorized Direct Preference Optimization for Robust LLM Alignment [48.487557157323664]
In practice, preference data are often noisy.<n>Existing robust variants of DPO mainly rely on uniform objective modifications or global reweighting.<n>We show that robust preference alignment benefits from addressing different noise types with targeted interventions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-07T13:30:53Z) - From Noisy Traces to Stable Gradients: Bias-Variance Optimized Preference Optimization for Aligning Large Reasoning Models [90.45197506653341]
Large reasoning models generate intermediate reasoning traces before producing final answers.<n> aligning LRMs with human preferences, a crucial prerequisite for model deployment, remains underexplored.<n>A common workaround optimized a single sampled trajectory, which introduces substantial gradient variance from trace sampling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T17:58:01Z) - Preference Trajectory Modeling via Flow Matching for Sequential Recommendation [50.077447974294586]
Sequential recommendation predicts each user's next item based on their historical interaction sequence.<n>FlowRec is a simple yet effective sequential recommendation framework.<n>We construct a personalized behavior-based prior distribution to replace Gaussian noise and learn a vector field to model user preference trajectories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-25T02:55:42Z) - Smoothed Preference Optimization via ReNoise Inversion for Aligning Diffusion Models with Varied Human Preferences [13.588231827053923]
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) aligns text-to-image (T2I) generation models with human preferences using pairwise preference data.<n>We propose SmPO-Diffusion, a novel method for modeling preference distributions to improve the DPO objective.<n>Our approach effectively mitigates issues of excessive optimization and objective misalignment present in existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T09:47:22Z) - FIND: Fine-tuning Initial Noise Distribution with Policy Optimization for Diffusion Models [10.969811500333755]
We introduce a Fine-tuning Initial Noise Distribution (FIND) framework with policy optimization.
Our method achieves 10 times faster than the SOTA approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-28T10:07:55Z) - Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.<n>To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.<n>Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.