Engineering Robustness into Personal Agents with the AI Workflow Store

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10907v2
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 03:17:19 GMT
• Title: Engineering Robustness into Personal Agents with the AI Workflow Store
• Abstract summary: We argue that the dominant paradigm for AI agents is an "on-the-fly" loop in which agents synthesize plans and execute actions within seconds or minutes in response to user prompts.<n>By focusing on rapid, real-time synthesis, are AI agents effectively delivering users improvised prototypes rather than systems fit for high-stakes scenarios in which users may unwittingly apply them?<n>This paper argues for the need to integrate rigorous SE processes into the agentic loop to produce production-grade, hardened, and deterministically-constrained agent *workflows* that substantially outperform the potentially brittle and vulnerable results of on-the-fly synthesis
• Score: 6.998267150166384
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The dominant paradigm for AI agents is an "on-the-fly" loop in which agents synthesize plans and execute actions within seconds or minutes in response to user prompts. We argue that this paradigm short-circuits disciplined software engineering (SE) processes -- iterative design, rigorous testing, adversarial evaluation, staged deployment, and more -- that have delivered the (relatively) reliable and secure systems we use today. By focusing on rapid, real-time synthesis, are AI agents effectively delivering users improvised prototypes rather than systems fit for high-stakes scenarios in which users may unwittingly apply them? This paper argues for the need to integrate rigorous SE processes into the agentic loop to produce production-grade, hardened, and deterministically-constrained agent *workflows* that substantially outperform the potentially brittle and vulnerable results of on-the-fly synthesis. Doing so may require extra compute and time, and if so, we must amortize the cost of rigor through reuse across a broad user community. We envision an *AI Workflow Store* that consists of hardened and reusable workflows that agents can invoke with far greater reliability and security than improvised tool chains. We outline the research challenges of this vision, which stem from a broader flexibility-robustness tension that we argue requires moving beyond the ``on-the-fly'' paradigm to navigate effectively.

Related papers

• From Atomic Actions to Standard Operating Procedures: Iterative Tool Optimization for Self-Evolving LLM Agents [90.3279207163486]
  EvoSOP is a framework that empowers agents to extract SOPs from execution trajectories and iteratively optimize the toolset.<n>We show that EvoSOP significantly boosts task success rates while substantially reducing the number of interaction rounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T12:09:49Z)
• Step-level Optimization for Efficient Computer-use Agents [51.29573359027217]
  We argue that strong computer-use agents remain expensive and slow in practice.<n>We propose an event-driven, step-level cascade for computer-use agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T19:59:36Z)
• ARTIS: Agentic Risk-Aware Test-Time Scaling via Iterative Simulation [72.78362530982109]
  ARTIS, Agentic Risk-Aware Test-Time Scaling via Iterative Simulation, is a framework that decouples exploration from commitment.<n>We show that naive LLM-based simulators struggle to capture rare but high-impact failure modes.<n>We introduce a risk-aware tool simulator that emphasizes fidelity on failure-inducing actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T06:33:22Z)
• EmboCoach-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Developing Embodied Robots [68.29056647487519]
  Embodied AI is fueled by high-fidelity simulation and large-scale data collection.<n>However, this scaling capability remains bottlenecked by a reliance on labor-intensive manual oversight.<n>We introduce textscEmboCoach-Bench, a benchmark evaluating the capacity of LLM agents to autonomously engineer embodied policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T11:33:49Z)
• ComAgent: Multi-LLM based Agentic AI Empowered Intelligent Wireless Networks [62.031889234230725]
  6G networks rely on complex cross-layer optimization.<n> manually translating high-level intents into mathematical formulations remains a bottleneck.<n>We present ComAgent, a multi-LLM agentic AI framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T13:43:59Z)
• Towards Efficient Agents: A Co-Design of Inference Architecture and System [66.59916327634639]
  This paper presents AgentInfer, a unified framework for end-to-end agent acceleration.<n>We decompose the problem into four synergistic components: AgentCollab, AgentSched, AgentSAM, and AgentCompress.<n>Experiments on the BrowseComp-zh and DeepDiver benchmarks demonstrate that through the synergistic collaboration of these methods, AgentInfer reduces ineffective token consumption by over 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-20T12:06:13Z)
• The Evolution of Agentic AI in Cybersecurity: From Single LLM Reasoners to Multi-Agent Systems and Autonomous Pipelines [0.0]
  Cybersecurity has become one of the earliest adopters of agentic AI.<n>This survey presents a five-generation taxonomy of agentic AI in cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T05:10:16Z)
• InfiAgent: Self-Evolving Pyramid Agent Framework for Infinite Scenarios [28.65914611521654]
  InfiAgent is a Pyramid-like DAG-based Multi-Agent Framework that can be applied to textbfinfinite scenarios.<n>InfiAgent achieves 9.9% higher performance compared to ADAS (similar auto-generated agent framework)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T15:44:09Z)
• SV-LLM: An Agentic Approach for SoC Security Verification using Large Language Models [8.912091484067508]
  We introduce SV-LLM, a novel multi-agent assistant system designed to automate and enhance system-on-chip (SoC) security verification.<n>By integrating specialized agents for tasks like verification question answering, security asset identification, threat modeling, test plan and property generation, vulnerability detection, and simulation-based bug validation, SV-LLM streamlines the workflow.<n>The system aims to reduce manual intervention, improve accuracy, and accelerate security analysis, supporting proactive identification and mitigation of risks early in the design cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T13:31:13Z)
• ProRefine: Inference-Time Prompt Refinement with Textual Feedback [10.679248386926703]
  AgenticThought, where multiple AI agents collaborate to accomplish complex tasks like reasoning or planning, play a substantial role in many cutting-edge commercial applications.<n>We introduce ProRefine, an innovative inference-time optimization method that uses an agentic loop of LLMs to generate and apply textual feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T17:52:30Z)
• The Cost of Dynamic Reasoning: Demystifying AI Agents and Test-Time Scaling from an AI Infrastructure Perspective [3.0868637098088403]
  Large-language-model (LLM)-based AI agents have recently showcased impressive versatility by employing dynamic reasoning.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive system-level analysis of AI agents, quantifying their resource usage, latency behavior, energy consumption, and test-time scaling strategies.<n>Our findings reveal that while agents improve accuracy with increased compute, they suffer from rapidly diminishing returns, widening latency variance, and unsustainable infrastructure costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T14:37:54Z)
• Asynchronous Tool Usage for Real-Time Agents [61.3041983544042]
  We introduce asynchronous AI agents capable of parallel processing and real-time tool-use. Our key contribution is an event-driven finite-state machine architecture for agent execution and prompting. This work presents both a conceptual framework and practical tools for creating AI agents capable of fluid, multitasking interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T23:57:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.