A Comparative Study of Federated Learning Aggregation Strategies under Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Data Distributions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11010v1
• Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 11:04:30 GMT
• Title: A Comparative Study of Federated Learning Aggregation Strategies under Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Data Distributions
• Abstract summary: Federated learning has emerged as a transformative paradigm for collaborative machine learning across distributed environments.<n>This work presents a comprehensive experimental comparison of widely used federated aggregation strategies under both homogeneous and heterogeneous data distributions.
• Score: 0.19845233274307664
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated Learning has emerged as a transformative paradigm for collaborative machine learning across distributed environments. However, its performance is strongly influenced by the aggregation strategy used to combine local model updates at the server, which directly affects learning performance, robustness, and system behavior. This work presents a comprehensive experimental comparison of widely used federated aggregation strategies under both homogeneous and heterogeneous data distributions. Using benchmark image classification datasets, we analyze how different aggregation mechanisms respond to varying degrees of data heterogeneity, examining their impact on centralized accuracy and loss, and system-level efficiency metrics, including aggregation, training, and communication time. The results demonstrate that aggregation strategies exhibit distinct trade-offs across datasets and data distributions, with their effectiveness varying according to dataset characteristics and operating conditions.

Related papers

• Cross-feature Contrastive Loss for Decentralized Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Data [8.946847190099206]
  We present a novel approach for decentralized learning on heterogeneous data. Cross-features for a pair of neighboring agents are the features obtained from the data of an agent with respect to the model parameters of the other agent. Our experiments show that the proposed method achieves superior performance (0.2-4% improvement in test accuracy) compared to other existing techniques for decentralized learning on heterogeneous data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T14:48:23Z)
• A Comparative Evaluation of FedAvg and Per-FedAvg Algorithms for Dirichlet Distributed Heterogeneous Data [2.5507252967536522]
  We investigate Federated Learning (FL), a paradigm of machine learning that allows for decentralized model training on devices without sharing raw data. We compare two strategies within this paradigm: Federated Averaging (FedAvg) and Personalized Federated Averaging (Per-FedAvg) Our results provide insights into the development of more effective and efficient machine learning strategies in a decentralized setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-03T21:33:15Z)
• Tackling Diverse Minorities in Imbalanced Classification [80.78227787608714]
  Imbalanced datasets are commonly observed in various real-world applications, presenting significant challenges in training classifiers. We propose generating synthetic samples iteratively by mixing data samples from both minority and majority classes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework through extensive experiments conducted on seven publicly available benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T18:48:34Z)
• Leveraging Ensembles and Self-Supervised Learning for Fully-Unsupervised Person Re-Identification and Text Authorship Attribution [77.85461690214551]
  Learning from fully-unlabeled data is challenging in Multimedia Forensics problems, such as Person Re-Identification and Text Authorship Attribution. Recent self-supervised learning methods have shown to be effective when dealing with fully-unlabeled data in cases where the underlying classes have significant semantic differences. We propose a strategy to tackle Person Re-Identification and Text Authorship Attribution by enabling learning from unlabeled data even when samples from different classes are not prominently diverse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T13:08:11Z)
• An Experimental Study of Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning Methods for Medical Imaging [8.984706828657814]
  Federated learning enables multiple institutions to collaboratively train machine learning models on their local data in a privacy-preserving way. We investigate the deleterious impact of a taxonomy of data heterogeneity regimes on federated learning methods, including quantity skew, label distribution skew, and imaging acquisition skew. We present several mitigation strategies to overcome performance drops from data heterogeneity, including weighted average for data quantity skew, weighted loss and batch normalization averaging for label distribution skew.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-18T05:47:48Z)
• Deep Stable Learning for Out-Of-Distribution Generalization [27.437046504902938]
  Approaches based on deep neural networks have achieved striking performance when testing data and training data share similar distribution. Eliminating the impact of distribution shifts between training and testing data is crucial for building performance-promising deep models. We propose to address this problem by removing the dependencies between features via learning weights for training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T03:54:21Z)
• Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations in Training Data [85.43008636875345]
  We show that diverse representation in training data is key to increasing subgroup performances and achieving population level objectives. Our analysis and experiments describe how dataset compositions influence performance and provide constructive results for using trends in existing data, alongside domain knowledge, to help guide intentional, objective-aware dataset design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-05T00:27:08Z)
• Federated Learning under Importance Sampling [49.17137296715029]
  We study the effect of importance sampling and devise schemes for sampling agents and data non-uniformly guided by a performance measure. We find that in schemes involving sampling without replacement, the performance of the resulting architecture is controlled by two factors related to data variability at each agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T10:08:55Z)
• Out-of-distribution Generalization via Partial Feature Decorrelation [72.96261704851683]
  We present a novel Partial Feature Decorrelation Learning (PFDL) algorithm, which jointly optimize a feature decomposition network and the target image classification model. The experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that our method can improve the backbone model's accuracy on OOD image classification datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-30T05:48:48Z)
• Dynamic Federated Learning [57.14673504239551]
  Federated learning has emerged as an umbrella term for centralized coordination strategies in multi-agent environments. We consider a federated learning model where at every iteration, a random subset of available agents perform local updates based on their data. Under a non-stationary random walk model on the true minimizer for the aggregate optimization problem, we establish that the performance of the architecture is determined by three factors, namely, the data variability at each agent, the model variability across all agents, and a tracking term that is inversely proportional to the learning rate of the algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T15:00:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.