fg-expo: Frontier-guided exploration-prioritized policy optimization via adaptive kl and gaussian curriculum

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11403v1
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 01:48:48 GMT
• Title: fg-expo: Frontier-guided exploration-prioritized policy optimization via adaptive kl and gaussian curriculum
• Abstract summary: We propose FG-ExPO, short for Frontier-Guided Exploration-Prioritized Policy Optimization.<n> Accuracy-Conditioned KL Scaling (AKL) adjusts the KL penalty strength through a smooth nonlinear function of batch average accuracy.<n>We conduct evaluations on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Qwen3-8B-Base across six mainstream mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
• Score: 11.537163059885687
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become the standard paradigm for LLM mathematical reasoning, with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) serving as the dominant algorithm. We identify two overlooked inefficiencies inherent in GRPO. First, a fixed KL coefficient overly restricts policy exploration at moments when the model needs to diverge significantly from the reference policy. Second, uniform question sampling overlooks that moderately difficult problems produce the most informative gradient signals. We propose FG-ExPO, short for Frontier-Guided Exploration-Prioritized Policy Optimization, which integrates two lightweight components. Accuracy-Conditioned KL Scaling (AKL) adjusts the KL penalty strength through a smooth nonlinear function of batch average accuracy, loosening the constraint when the model performs poorly and strengthening it when the model achieves satisfactory results. Gaussian Curriculum Sampling (GCS) assigns sampling weights to questions following a Gaussian distribution centered at a moderate accuracy level around 0.5, focusing model training on its learning frontier. We conduct evaluations on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Qwen3-8B-Base across six mainstream mathematical reasoning benchmarks. Experimental results demonstrate that FG-ExPO consistently outperforms vanilla GRPO. It delivers an absolute improvement of 13.34 on the AIME 2025 pass@32 metric, rising from 63.33 percent to 76.67 percent, and obtains an average pass@32 gain of 2.66 on the 8B model. The substantially larger performance gains observed on pass@32 compared to pass@1 verify that FG-ExPO enlarges the model's effective exploration space under a fixed inference budget.

Related papers

• Selective-Advantage Entropy-Adaptive Horizon GRPO: Asymmetric Token-Level Discounting for Efficient Reinforcement Learning of Language Models [0.0]
  Group Relative Policy optimisation has emerged as an effective reinforcement-learning algorithm for aligning language models on reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce two complementary extensions: Adaptive-Horizon GRPO and Selective-Advantage AH-GRPO.<n>Our analysis shows that asymmetric discounting preserves the full gradient signal on correct solutions, prevents entropy collapse, and substantially stabilises training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T20:57:57Z)
• Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation [13.272542054938258]
  We introduce the Advantage Collapse Rate (ACR), the first metric quantifying the proportion of training batches with ineffective gradients.<n>We then propose Adaptive Virtual Sample Policy Optimization (AVSPO), a lightweight extension of GRPO that injects virtual reward samples.<n>AVSPO reduces advantage collapse by 58-63% relative to GRPO and yields consistent accuracy gains of 4-6 percentage points across all model scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T12:57:37Z)
• expo: Exploration-prioritized policy optimization via adaptive kl regulation and gaussian curriculum sampling [11.537163059885687]
  We propose Exploration-Prioritized Policy Optimization (EXPO) with two lightweight plug-in modules.<n>We conduct experiments on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Qwen3-8B-Base over six mathematical reasoning benchmarks.<n>It obtains an absolute gain of 13.34 on AIME 2025 pass@32, rising from 63.33 percent to 76.67 percent, and achieves an average pass@32 improvement of 2.66 on the 8B model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T03:19:04Z)
• GRPO-VPS: Enhancing Group Relative Policy Optimization with Verifiable Process Supervision for Effective Reasoning [48.32628338889922]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization suffers from indiscriminate credit assignment for intermediate steps.<n>We introduce a model-free and verifiable process supervision via probing the model's belief in the correct answer.<n>This approach enables more targeted and sample-efficient policy updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T15:08:58Z)
• Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
  We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z)
• REAL: Regression-Aware Reinforcement Learning for LLM-as-a-Judge [83.2858110368572]
  We propose textbfREAL (underlineREgression-underlineAware Reinforcement underlineLThought), a principled RL framework designed to optimize regression rewards.<n>We show that REAL consistently outperforms both regression-aware SFT baselines and standard RL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T21:19:08Z)
• Unbiased Dynamic Pruning for Efficient Group-Based Policy Optimization [60.87651283510059]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) effectively scales LLM reasoning but incurs prohibitive computational costs.<n>We propose Dynamic Pruning Policy Optimization (DPPO), a framework that enables dynamic pruning while preserving unbiased gradient estimation.<n>To mitigate the data sparsity induced by pruning, we introduce Dense Prompt Packing, a window-based greedy strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T14:48:53Z)
• iGRPO: Self-Feedback-Driven LLM Reasoning [88.83313431248473]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in solving complex mathematical problems, yet they still fall short of producing accurate and consistent solutions.<n>We introduce Iterative Group Relative Policy Optimization (iGRPO), a two-stage extension of GRPO that adds dynamic self-conditioning through model-generated drafts.<n>Under matched rollout budgets, iGRPO consistently outperforms GRPO across base models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T18:45:11Z)
• Scaf-GRPO: Scaffolded Group Relative Policy Optimization for Enhancing LLM Reasoning [49.290631188365786]
  Scaf-GRPO is a training framework that intervenes when a model's independent learning has plateaued.<n>It boosts the pass@1 score of the Qwen2.5-Math-7B model by a relative 44.3% over a vanilla GRPO baseline.<n>This result demonstrates our framework provides a robust and effective methodology for unlocking a model's ability to solve problems previously beyond its reach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T17:41:30Z)
• Single-stream Policy Optimization [21.214853668053234]
  We introduce Single-stream Policy Optimization (SPO)<n>SPO replaces per-group baselines with a persistent, KL-adaptive value tracker and normalizes advantages globally across the batch.<n>Being group-free, SPO enables higher throughput and scales effectively in long-horizon or tool-integrated settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T16:39:11Z)
• Iterative Nash Policy Optimization: Aligning LLMs with General Preferences via No-Regret Learning [55.65738319966385]
  We propose a novel online algorithm, iterative Nash policy optimization (INPO)<n>Unlike previous methods, INPO bypasses the need for estimating the expected win rate for individual responses.<n>With an LLaMA-3-8B-based SFT model, INPO achieves a 42.6% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 and a 37.8% win rate on Arena-Hard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T08:00:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.