Semantic Reward Collapse and the Preservation of Epistemic Integrity in Adaptive AI Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12406v1
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 17:03:26 GMT
• Title: Semantic Reward Collapse and the Preservation of Epistemic Integrity in Adaptive AI Systems
• Abstract summary: Recent advances in reinforcement learning have substantially improved the usability, coherence, and safety of large language models.<n> recurring behaviors such as performative certainty suggest unresolved structural issues within scalarized preference optimization systems.<n>We propose Semantic Reward Collapse (SRC), the compression of semantically distinct forms of evaluative dissatisfaction into generalized optimization signals.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and preference optimization have substantially improved the usability, coherence, and safety of large language models. However, recurring behaviors such as performative certainty, hallucinated continuity, calibration drift, sycophancy, and suppression of visible uncertainty suggest unresolved structural issues within scalarized preference optimization systems. We propose Semantic Reward Collapse (SRC): the compression of semantically distinct forms of evaluative dissatisfaction into generalized optimization signals. Under SRC, categories such as factual incorrectness, uncertainty disclosure, formatting dissatisfaction, latency, and social preference may become entangled within a shared reward topology despite representing fundamentally different epistemic classes. We argue that adaptive reasoning systems operating under generalized evaluative pressure may drift toward suppression of visible epistemic failure rather than preservation of calibrated uncertainty integrity. These behaviors are framed strictly as optimization consequences rather than evidence of deception or anthropomorphic agency. Drawing on institutional proxy collapse, metric gaming, software reliability engineering, and human learning theory, we propose that uncertainty disclosure and escalation behavior should be treated as protected epistemic conduct rather than globally penalized task incompletion. Finally, we introduce Constitutional Reward Stratification (CRS), a domain-aware reward framework intended to preserve differentiated epistemic attribution within adaptive learning systems. We present CRS not as a validated solution, but as a testable governance-oriented research direction requiring further empirical investigation.

Related papers

• Epistemic Norms for AI Safety and Alignment Research [0.989901717499058]
  We argue that the two domains differ along two analytically independent axes.<n>sc ECAISA does not certify that any AI system is safe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T10:22:46Z)
• Agency and Architectural Limits: Why Optimization-Based Systems Cannot Be Norm-Responsive [0.0]
  AI systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes contexts under the assumption they can be governed by norms.<n>This paper demonstrates that the assumption is formally invalid for optimization-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T17:16:17Z)
• Know What You Know: Metacognitive Entropy Calibration for Verifiable RL Reasoning [31.629261193485053]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving complex real-world tasks.<n>Most existing outcome-only RLVR pipelines rely almost exclusively on a binary correctness signal and largely ignore the model's intrinsic uncertainty.<n>We propose EGPO, a metacognitive entropy calibration framework that explicitly integrates intrinsic uncertainty into RLVR for enhancing LRMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T08:40:06Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Generative Recommendation [52.0751022792023]
  Uncertainty-aware Generative Recommendation (UGR) is a unified framework that leverages uncertainty as a critical signal for adaptive optimization.<n>UGR not only yields superior recommendation performance but also fundamentally stabilizes training, preventing the performance degradation often observed in standard methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T08:48:51Z)
• When Evaluation Becomes a Side Channel: Regime Leakage and Structural Mitigations for Alignment Assessment [0.0]
  Safety evaluation for advanced AI systems assumes that behavior observed under evaluation predicts behavior in deployment.<n>We recast alignment evaluation as a problem of information flow under partial observability.<n>We study regime-blind mechanisms, training-time interventions that restrict access to regime cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T10:00:24Z)
• UCPO: Uncertainty-Aware Policy Optimization [12.847800921274617]
  Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from Advantage Bias due to binary decision spaces and static uncertainty rewards, inducing excessive conservatism or overconfidence.<n>This paper unveils the root causes of reward hacking and overconfidence in current RL paradigms incorporating uncertainty-based rewards, based on which we propose the UnCertainty-Aware Policy Optimization framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T07:07:42Z)
• Rediscovering Entropy Regularization: Adaptive Coefficient Unlocks Its Potential for LLM Reinforcement Learning [55.59724323303857]
  We propose a framework that balances exploration and exploitation via three components: difficulty-aware coefficient allocation, initial-anchored target entropy, and dynamic global coefficient adjustment.<n>Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that AER consistently outperforms baselines, improving both reasoning accuracy and exploration capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T03:10:26Z)
• Sycophancy Mitigation Through Reinforcement Learning with Uncertainty-Aware Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories [58.988535279557546]
  We introduce textbf sycophancy Mitigation through Adaptive Reasoning Trajectories.<n>We show that SMART significantly reduces sycophantic behavior while preserving strong performance on out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T17:09:14Z)
• The Pitfalls and Promise of Conformal Inference Under Adversarial Attacks [90.52808174102157]
  In safety-critical applications such as medical imaging and autonomous driving, it is imperative to maintain both high adversarial robustness to protect against potential adversarial attacks. A notable knowledge gap remains concerning the uncertainty inherent in adversarially trained models. This study investigates the uncertainty of deep learning models by examining the performance of conformal prediction (CP) in the context of standard adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T18:05:19Z)
• Diagnosing and Rectifying Fake OOD Invariance: A Restructured Causal Approach [51.012396632595554]
  Invariant representation learning (IRL) encourages the prediction from invariant causal features to labels de-confounded from the environments. Recent theoretical results verified that some causal features recovered by IRLs merely pretend domain-invariantly in the training environments but fail in unseen domains. We develop an approach based on conditional mutual information with respect to RS-SCM, then rigorously rectify the spurious and fake invariant effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T12:58:05Z)
• Corruption-robust exploration in episodic reinforcement learning [76.19192549843727]
  We study multi-stage episodic reinforcement learning under adversarial corruptions in both the rewards and the transition probabilities of the underlying system. Our framework yields efficient algorithms which attain near-optimal regret in the absence of corruptions. Notably, our work provides the first sublinear regret guarantee which any deviation from purely i.i.d. transitions in the bandit-feedback model for episodic reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-11-20T03:49:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.