AgenticAITA: A Proof-Of-Concept About Deliberative Multi-Agent Reasoning for Autonomous Trading Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12532v1
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2026 16:25:43 GMT
- Title: AgenticAITA: A Proof-Of-Concept About Deliberative Multi-Agent Reasoning for Autonomous Trading Systems
- Abstract summary: AGENTICAITA is an agentic AI framework that replaces the traditional signal then execute paradigm with a fully autonomous loop.<n>The framework demonstrates operational correctness of the deliberative pipeline, achieving 157 zero-intervention invocations across 76 assets.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Conventional algorithmic trading systems are grounded in deterministic heuristics or offline-trained statistical models that cannot adapt to the semantic complexity of rapidly shifting market regimes. This paper introduces AGENTICAITA, an agentic AI framework that replaces the traditional signal then execute paradigm with a fully autonomous deliberative loop in which multiple specialized Large Language Model agents reason, negotiate, and act in concert - without any offline training or human intervention. The framework proposes four architectural contributions: (i) an Adaptive Z-Score Trigger Engine that acts as a cognitive resource allocator, gating LLM inference exclusively on statistically anomalous market conditions; (ii) a Sequential Deliberative Pipeline - the core agentic contribution - in which an Analyst agent, a Risk Manager agent, and an Executor agent form a structured reasoning chain governed by typed JSON contracts and a deterministic hard-gate safety layer; (iii) an Inference Gating Protocol, a mutex-based cognitive resource scheduler that serializes concurrent agent activations and ensures fully reproducible audit trails; and (iv) a Correlation-Break Diversification composite score that operationalizes portfolio-level idiosyncratic signal prioritization within individual agent reasoning. Validated over a five-day autonomous dry-run session under live market conditions, the framework demonstrates operational correctness of the deliberative pipeline, achieving 157 zero-intervention invocations across 76 assets with an 11.5% agentic friction rate that confirms non-trivial inter-agent negotiation. This preliminary proof-of-concept establishes the feasibility of training-free, deterministic safety-constrained multi-agent orchestration in financial decision loops, with statistically robust performance evaluation and execution cost modeling deferred to extended live deployment.
Related papers
- From Sequence to Structure: Relational Uncertainty Propagation for LLM Agents [75.69180947909148]
We propose a trajectory-level UQ framework for large language model (LLM) agents.<n>RuPA represents an execution history as a directed trajectory graph in which reasoning states, tool interactions, and environment feedback are nodes connected by temporal and semantic dependency edges.<n>We evaluate RUPA on representative agent benchmarks, including $$-2, Terminal-Bench-2, and GAIA, using 6 open-source LLMs spanning multiple model families.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-17T01:40:14Z) - Semantic Uncertainty-Guided Orchestration in Hierarchical Multi-Agent Systems [11.562923882714095]
This paper introduces a semantic-uncertainty-guided orchestration approach, HASSUM.<n>It estimates uncertainty using semantic entropy and semantic density, which measure trust at the level of answer semantics rather than output probabilities.<n>Because the approach operates independently of any particular agent architecture, it can be integrated into a broad range of hierarchical and collaborative multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-11T03:55:53Z) - The Dynamic Verifiable Multi-Agent Human Agentic Loyalty Loop (DVM-HALL) Model and the Net Human-Agent Score (NHAS) in Autonomous Commerce [0.0]
The rapid proliferation of Agentic Artificial Intelligence fundamentally disrupts traditional customer loyalty paradigms.<n>We introduce the Dynamic Verifiable Multi-Agent Human Agentic Loyalty Loop model.<n>We propose a comprehensive three-stage empirical validation plan spanning controlled shopping experiments, multi-agent market simulations, and DeFi testbeds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-15T16:27:48Z) - Plan First, Judge Later, Run Better: A DMAIC-Inspired Agentic System for Industrial Anomaly Detection [51.90293101535452]
We propose DMAIC-IAD (DMAIC-inspired Agentic Industrial Anomaly Detection), a "Plan First, Judge Later" multi-agent system.<n>We show DMAIC-IAD improves average detection performance over applicable agentic baselines by 37.76%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-03T08:38:14Z) - SHARP: A Self-Evolving Human-Auditable Rubric Policy for Financial Trading Agents [11.616028403813031]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous financial trading.<n>We introduce the Self-Evolving Human-Auditable Policy (SHARP), a neuro-symbolic framework that replaces unconstrained text mutation with structured, symbolic policy optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T18:23:44Z) - AlphaCrafter: A Full-Stack Multi-Agent Framework for Cross-Sectional Quantitative Trading [26.48283300875701]
Building quantitative strategies that remain profitable demands the continuous coupling of factor discovery, regime-adaptive selection, and risk-constrained execution.<n>We introduce AlphaCrafter, a full-stack multi-agent framework that closes this gap through a continuously adaptive factor-to-execution pipeline.<n>Experiments on CSI 300 and S&P 500 demonstrate that AlphaCrafter consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in risk-adjusted returns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T01:58:30Z) - Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignment [59.536125286960186]
Multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing.<n>We find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry.<n>ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-21T15:05:58Z) - AgenticSimLaw: A Juvenile Courtroom Multi-Agent Debate Simulation for Explainable High-Stakes Tabular Decision Making [0.6218206949753592]
We introduce AgenticSimLaw, a role-structured, multi-agent debate framework that provides transparent and controllable testtime reasoning.<n>Unlike black-box approaches, our courtroom-style orchestration explicitly defines agent roles.<n>We benchmark this framework on young adult recidivism prediction using the NLSY97 dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T16:26:10Z) - Towards Efficient Agents: A Co-Design of Inference Architecture and System [66.59916327634639]
This paper presents AgentInfer, a unified framework for end-to-end agent acceleration.<n>We decompose the problem into four synergistic components: AgentCollab, AgentSched, AgentSAM, and AgentCompress.<n>Experiments on the BrowseComp-zh and DeepDiver benchmarks demonstrate that through the synergistic collaboration of these methods, AgentInfer reduces ineffective token consumption by over 50%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-20T12:06:13Z) - Norm-Governed Multi-Agent Decision-Making in Simulator-Coupled Environments:The Reinsurance Constrained Multi-Agent Simulation Process (R-CMASP) [0.0]
We show how a domain-calibrated synthetic environment that governed multi-agent coordination yields more stable, coherent, and norm-adherent behaviour than deterministic automation.<n>Results suggest that regulated, simulator-driven decision environments are most naturally modelled as norm-governed, simulator-coupled multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-04T10:30:26Z) - Trade in Minutes! Rationality-Driven Agentic System for Quantitative Financial Trading [57.28635022507172]
TiMi is a rationality-driven multi-agent system that architecturally decouples strategy development from minute-level deployment.<n>We propose a two-tier analytical paradigm from macro patterns to micro customization, layered programming design for trading bot implementation, and closed-loop optimization driven by mathematical reflection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T13:08:55Z) - Towards Self-Evolving Benchmarks: Synthesizing Agent Trajectories via Test-Time Exploration under Validate-by-Reproduce Paradigm [60.36837655498119]
We propose a Trajectory-based validated-by-Reproducing Agent-benchmark Complexity Evolution framework.<n>This framework takes an original task from an existing benchmark and encourages agents to evolve it into a new task with higher difficulty.<n>Experiments on the GAIA benchmark demonstrate that the TRACE framework consistently enhances task complexity while improving the reliability of correctness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T01:52:52Z) - Towards Transparent and Incentive-Compatible Collaboration in Decentralized LLM Multi-Agent Systems: A Blockchain-Driven Approach [21.498244821985562]
We propose a blockchain-based framework that enables transparent agent registration, verifiable task allocation, and dynamic reputation tracking.<n>Our implementation integrates GPT-4 agents with Solidity contracts and demonstrates, through 50-round simulations, strong task success rates, stable utility distribution, and emergent agent specialization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-20T16:00:24Z) - STARec: An Efficient Agent Framework for Recommender Systems via Autonomous Deliberate Reasoning [54.28691219536054]
We introduce STARec, a slow-thinking augmented agent framework that endows recommender systems with autonomous deliberative reasoning capabilities.<n>We develop anchored reinforcement training - a two-stage paradigm combining structured knowledge distillation from advanced reasoning models with preference-aligned reward shaping.<n>Experiments on MovieLens 1M and Amazon CDs benchmarks demonstrate that STARec achieves substantial performance gains compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-26T08:47:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.