The Dynamic Verifiable Multi-Agent Human Agentic Loyalty Loop (DVM-HALL) Model and the Net Human-Agent Score (NHAS) in Autonomous Commerce

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13998v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:27:48 GMT
• Title: The Dynamic Verifiable Multi-Agent Human Agentic Loyalty Loop (DVM-HALL) Model and the Net Human-Agent Score (NHAS) in Autonomous Commerce
• Abstract summary: The rapid proliferation of Agentic Artificial Intelligence fundamentally disrupts traditional customer loyalty paradigms.<n>We introduce the Dynamic Verifiable Multi-Agent Human Agentic Loyalty Loop model.<n>We propose a comprehensive three-stage empirical validation plan spanning controlled shopping experiments, multi-agent market simulations, and DeFi testbeds.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rapid proliferation of Agentic Artificial Intelligence fundamentally disrupts traditional customer loyalty paradigms. As AI evolves from passive recommendation algorithms to autonomous, goal-directed agents capable of executing purchasing decisions, the conventional understanding of consumer-brand relationships requires a structural reevaluation. By synthesizing extant literature across human-machine teaming, consumer decision-making, and algorithmic trust dynamics, we demonstrate that traditional loyalty models fail to account for algorithmic bounded rationality and constructed autonomy. To address this, we introduce the Dynamic Verifiable Multi-Agent Human Agentic Loyalty Loop (DVM-HALL) model. We formalize brand choice via a softmax probability formulation where human emotional equity, agentic machine-experience utility, calibrated trust, delegated authority, and verifiable execution jointly determine selection. The model features recursive updating mechanisms to dynamically calibrate trust and delegation after each interaction. Crucially, the framework integrates a verifiable execution layer for Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and tokenized loyalty settings, incorporating execution risks -- such as gas costs, slippage, MEV exposure, and smart-contract vulnerabilities -- as core predictors of agentic brand preference. Furthermore, we introduce the Net Human-Agent Score (NHAS), an auditable, risk-weighted metric designed to measure human-agent alignment using human feedback, execution logs, benchmark comparisons, and verifiable receipts. Finally, we propose a comprehensive three-stage empirical validation plan spanning controlled shopping experiments, multi-agent market simulations, and DeFi testbeds. This framework provides the foundational theory required for brands to navigate the impending transition toward machine customers.

Related papers

• ComBodied Agents: a New Paradigm of Human-Centric Agentic AI [121.60938707072069]
  We introduce Combodied Agents, a human-centered paradigm that perceives, models, predicts, and supports individual human-state trajectories over time.<n>We unify fragmented capabilities across personal assistants, health agents, AI companions, and adaptive human--AI systems into a closed loop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T13:35:58Z)
• Autonomous Information Seeking: A Roadmap for Agentic Recommender Systems [64.88044474617854]
  The rapid integration of large language model-based agents into recommender systems has driven a shift from static, ranking-based pipelines toward autonomous and interactive systems.<n>This survey introduces a unified taxonomy grounded in the level of autonomy and three core paradigms of agentic recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-05T17:55:05Z)
• The Meta-Agent Challenge: Are Current Agents Capable of Autonomous Agent Development? [80.24951682268332]
  We introduce the Meta-Agent Challenge (MAC), an evaluation framework designed to test the capacity of frontier models for autonomous agent development.<n>To ensure evaluation integrity, this framework is secured by multi-layer defenses against reward hacking.<n>We demonstrate that meta-agents rarely match human-engineered baseline policies, and the few that do are dominated by proprietary frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T04:58:17Z)
• A Case-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for E-Commerce Search Relevance [0.0]
  Relevance is a foundation of user experience in e-commerce search.<n>We propose a case-driven multi-agent framework that automates the pipeline from bad-case identification to resolution.<n>We show that the framework performs relevance-related tasks effectively, improves annotation accuracy, and enables more timely and generalizable bad-case resolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T10:41:50Z)
• AgenticAITA: A Proof-Of-Concept About Deliberative Multi-Agent Reasoning for Autonomous Trading Systems [0.0]
  AGENTICAITA is an agentic AI framework that replaces the traditional signal then execute paradigm with a fully autonomous loop.<n>The framework demonstrates operational correctness of the deliberative pipeline, achieving 157 zero-intervention invocations across 76 assets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-01T16:25:43Z)
• Beyond Retrieval: Modeling Confidence Decay and Deterministic Agentic Platforms in Generative Engine Optimization [15.714806612554641]
  We systematically deconstruct the probabilistic flaws of existing RAG-based GEO.<n>We propose a paradigm shift towards deterministic multi-agent intent routing.<n>This work establishes a foundational theoretical framework for next-generation GEO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-04T09:17:37Z)
• Turing Test on Screen: A Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agent Humanization [40.016387553294685]
  We argue that for agents to survive in human-centric ecosystems, they must evolve Humanization capabilities.<n>This work shifts the paradigm from whether an agent can perform a task to how it performs it within a human-centric ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T04:29:42Z)
• Embedded Universal Predictive Intelligence: a coherent framework for multi-agent learning [57.23345786304694]
  We introduce a framework for prospective learning and embedded agency centered on self-prediction.<n>We show that in multi-agent settings, self-prediction enables agents to reason about others running similar algorithms.<n>We extend the theory of AIXI, and study universally intelligent embedded agents which start from a Solomonoff prior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T08:46:48Z)
• How can we assess human-agent interactions? Case studies in software agent design [52.953425368394306]
  We make two major steps towards the rigorous assessment of human-agent interactions.<n>We propose PULSE, a framework for more efficient human-centric evaluation of agent designs.<n>We deploy the framework on a large-scale web platform built around the open-source software agent OpenHands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T19:04:28Z)
• STARec: An Efficient Agent Framework for Recommender Systems via Autonomous Deliberate Reasoning [54.28691219536054]
  We introduce STARec, a slow-thinking augmented agent framework that endows recommender systems with autonomous deliberative reasoning capabilities.<n>We develop anchored reinforcement training - a two-stage paradigm combining structured knowledge distillation from advanced reasoning models with preference-aligned reward shaping.<n>Experiments on MovieLens 1M and Amazon CDs benchmarks demonstrate that STARec achieves substantial performance gains compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T08:47:58Z)
• Principal-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Orchestrating AI Agents with Contracts [20.8288955218712]
  We propose a framework where a principal guides an agent in a Markov Decision Process (MDP) using a series of contracts. We present and analyze a meta-algorithm that iteratively optimize the policies of the principal and agent. We then scale our algorithm with deep Q-learning and analyze its convergence in the presence of approximation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T14:28:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.