Quantum Field-Theoretic Predictions of Ψ-Epistemic Models of Quantum Mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12546v1
• Date: Sat, 09 May 2026 15:07:21 GMT
• Title: Quantum Field-Theoretic Predictions of Ψ-Epistemic Models of Quantum Mechanics
• Abstract summary: $$-epistemic models of quantum mechanics imply that the quantum state does not correspond to physical reality.<n>We show that $$-epistemic models can give rise to deviations from standard quantum field-theoretic predictions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: $Ψ$-epistemic models of quantum mechanics imply that the quantum state does not correspond to physical reality, but instead reflects the observer's knowledge of the underlying quantum system. The epistemic view of the quantum state has the potential to shed light on several foundational problems of quantum theory and has attracted considerable attention in the literature. On the other hand, the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem demonstrated that broad classes of $ψ$-epistemic models must lead to predictions that deviate from those of quantum mechanics. Although the original theorem involved entangled joint measurements on composite systems, alternative no-go theorems involving measurements on single quantum systems were developed shortly thereafter. Experimental investigations of the deviations predicted by $ψ$-epistemic models from quantum mechanics are still ongoing. So far, such tests have been performed within the framework of non-relativistic quantum mechanics and predominantly rely on quantum information based measurement procedures. In this work, assuming that $ψ$-epistemic models respect Lorentz symmetry, we show that they can give rise to deviations from standard quantum field-theoretic predictions through modifications of polarized scattering cross sections and decay widths. Our results do not require a relativistic formulation of ontological models or of the Harrigan-Spekkens criterion; Lorentz symmetry alone is sufficient. The present work constitutes a proof-of-principle study demonstrating that particle physics tests of the ontological status of the quantum state are possible and that $ψ$-epistemic models may exhibit experimentally distinguishable signatures in particle phenomenology.

Related papers

• Quantum model for black holes and clocks [41.99844472131922]
  We consider a stationary quantum system consisting of two non-interacting yet entangled subsystems, $$ and $$.<n>We identify a quantum theory characterizing $$ such that, in the quantum-to-classical crossover of the composite system, $$ behaves as a test particle within the gravitational field of a Schwarzschild Black Hole.<n>This leads us to discuss how the quantum model for $$ endows the SBH with all the characteristics of a "perfect" clock.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T11:26:06Z)
• Semiclassical gravity phenomenology under the causal-conditional quantum measurement prescription II: Heisenberg picture and apparent optical entanglement [13.04737397490371]
  In quantum gravity theory, a state-dependent gravitational potential introduces nonlinearity into the state evolution. The formalism for understanding the continuous quantum measurement process on the quantum state has been previously discussed using the Schr"odinger picture. In this work, an equivalent formalism using the Heisenberg picture is developed and applied to the analysis of two optomechanical experiment protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T14:07:18Z)
• Phenomenological quantum mechanics I: phenomenology of quantum observables [0.0]
  We show that it is possible to derive a complete and fully functional formalism rooted in the structures of Hilbert spaces.<n>The resulting formalism--the bi-trajectory formalism--differs significantly from the standard state-focused formulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T12:17:30Z)
• A Theory of Quantum Jumps [44.99833362998488]
  We study fluorescence and the phenomenon of quantum jumps'' in idealized models of atoms coupled to the quantized electromagnetic field. Our results amount to a derivation of the fundamental randomness in the quantum-mechanical description of microscopic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T11:00:46Z)
• Quantum data learning for quantum simulations in high-energy physics [55.41644538483948]
  We explore the applicability of quantum-data learning to practical problems in high-energy physics. We make use of ansatz based on quantum convolutional neural networks and numerically show that it is capable of recognizing quantum phases of ground states. The observation of non-trivial learning properties demonstrated in these benchmarks will motivate further exploration of the quantum-data learning architecture in high-energy physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T18:00:01Z)
• Topological extension including quantum jump [4.681851642601744]
  We study the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model with collective loss and gain from a topological perspective. Our study provides a qualitative analysis of the impact of quantum jumping terms and reveals their unique role in quantum systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T13:26:57Z)
• Semi-classical gravity phenomenology under the causal-conditional quantum measurement prescription [9.842140146649346]
  We study experimentally measurable signatures of SN theory under the causal-conditional prescription in an optomechanical system. We find that quantum measurement can induce a classical correlation between two different optical fields via classical gravity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T05:09:55Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Probing the limits of quantum theory with quantum information at subnuclear scales [0.13844779265721088]
  We propose a new theoretical framework of Q-data tests. It recognises the established validity of quantum theory, but allows for more general -- 'post-quantum' -- scenarios in certain physical regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T16:47:39Z)
• Non-equilibrium stationary states of quantum non-Hermitian lattice models [68.8204255655161]
  We show how generic non-Hermitian tight-binding lattice models can be realized in an unconditional, quantum-mechanically consistent manner. We focus on the quantum steady states of such models for both fermionic and bosonic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T18:56:44Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• Probing the Universality of Topological Defect Formation in a Quantum Annealer: Kibble-Zurek Mechanism and Beyond [46.39654665163597]
  We report on experimental tests of topological defect formation via the one-dimensional transverse-field Ising model. We find that the quantum simulator results can indeed be explained by the KZM for open-system quantum dynamics with phase-flip errors. This implies that the theoretical predictions of the generalized KZM theory, which assumes isolation from the environment, applies beyond its original scope to an open system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-31T02:55:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.