Revisiting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards from a Contrastive Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12969v2
• Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 06:59:49 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards from a Contrastive Perspective
• Abstract summary: We present a framework for Contrastive Sequence-level Policy Optimization in RLVR.<n>ConSPO replaces GRPO's clipped ratio-based scores with length-normalized sequence log-probabilities.<n>ConSPO consistently outperforms several strong RLVR baselines on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
• Score: 10.958642517467721
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: RLVR has become a widely adopted paradigm for improving LLMs' reasoning capabilities, and GRPO is one of its most representative algorithms. In this paper, we first show that GRPO admits an equivalent discriminative reformulation as a weighted positive-negative score difference. Under this view, GRPO increases sequence-level scores of verified positive rollouts and decreases those of negative rollouts, where the scores are averages of clipped token-level importance sampling ratios. This reformulation reveals two structural limitations of GRPO: likelihood-misaligned scoring, where clipped ratio-based surrogate scores are optimized instead of generation likelihoods, and score-insensitive credit assignment, where rollout-level credit is assigned without accounting for relative score gaps between positive and negative rollouts in the same group. To address these limitations, we propose ConSPO, a framework for Contrastive Sequence-level Policy Optimization in RLVR. ConSPO replaces GRPO's clipped ratio-based scores with length-normalized sequence log-probabilities, aligning the optimized rollout scores with the likelihoods used in autoregressive generation. It then optimizes a group-wise InfoNCE-style objective that contrasts each positive rollout against negative distractors from the same group, enabling credit assignment to depend on their relative scores. This contrastive formulation amplifies updates for poorly separated positives while concentrating suppressive updates on high-scoring negatives. Moreover, ConSPO introduces a curriculum-scheduled margin, guiding optimization from coarse positive-negative ordering in early training toward stronger separation in later stages. Extensive evaluations across diverse backbone models, parameter scales, and training datasets show that ConSPO consistently outperforms several strong RLVR baselines on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks.

Related papers

• RRPO: Reference-Relative Policy Optimization with Stratified Conditional Rollouts [84.20747697259326]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has shown strong effectiveness in reinforcement learning from verifiable feedback.<n>We propose textbfReference-Relative Policy Optimization (RRPO), which generalizes GRPO by replacing direct correctness-based advantage construction with reference-relative contrastive comparisons.<n>We evaluate RRPO using anchor-based contrastive advantages throughout policy optimization, without relying on task ground-truth verifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T19:40:25Z)
• Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation [13.272542054938258]
  We introduce the Advantage Collapse Rate (ACR), the first metric quantifying the proportion of training batches with ineffective gradients.<n>We then propose Adaptive Virtual Sample Policy Optimization (AVSPO), a lightweight extension of GRPO that injects virtual reward samples.<n>AVSPO reduces advantage collapse by 58-63% relative to GRPO and yields consistent accuracy gains of 4-6 percentage points across all model scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T12:57:37Z)
• F-GRPO: Factorized Group-Relative Policy Optimization for Unified Candidate Generation and Ranking [79.49893545611779]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate a subset and order it within a single autoregressive pass.<n>This flexibility introduces a new optimization challenge: the model must search an output space while receiving utility feedback only after the full ranked list is generated.<n>This credit assignment gap makes end-to-end optimization unstable and sample-inefficient.<n>We propose a unified framework that performs both within a single autoregressive rollout and optimize them end-to-end via factorized group-relative policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T04:52:33Z)
• Beyond Negative Rollouts: Positive-Only Policy Optimization with Implicit Negative Gradients [19.444308344942716]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) becomes a dominant paradigm for enhancing the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose Positive-Only Policy Optimization (POPO), a novel RLVR framework in which learning can occur exclusively via online positive rollouts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T17:55:21Z)
• Balanced Aggregation: Understanding and Fixing Aggregation Bias in GRPO [70.38763678943648]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a central paradigm for improving reasoning and code generation in large language models.<n>Standard GRPO uses sequence aggregation, while recent work has advocated token aggregation as a better alternative.<n>We show that these two rules induce different optimization biases; token aggregation introduces sign-length coupling, while sequence aggregation implicitly downweights longer responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T09:48:46Z)
• When Right Meets Wrong: Bilateral Context Conditioning with Reward-Confidence Correction for GRPO [18.988527161000203]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as an effective method for training reasoning models.<n>We present a contrastive reformulation of GRPO, showing that the GRPO objective implicitly maximizes the margin between the policy ratios of correct and incorrect samples.<n>We propose Bilateral Context Conditioning (BICC), a mechanism that allows the model to cross-reference successful and failed reasoning traces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T16:25:02Z)
• From Absolute to Relative: Rethinking Reward Shaping in Group-Based Reinforcement Learning [7.6602542594279335]
  We propose Reinforcement Learning with Relative Rewards to shift reward shaping from absolute scoring to relative ranking.<n>We show that RLRR yields consistent performance improvements over standard group-based baselines across reasoning benchmarks and open-ended generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T15:07:06Z)
• Outcome-Grounded Advantage Reshaping for Fine-Grained Credit Assignment in Mathematical Reasoning [60.00161035836637]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization has emerged as a promising critic-free reinforcement learning paradigm for reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce Outcome-grounded Advantage Reshaping (OAR), a fine-grained credit assignment mechanism that redistributes advantages based on how much each token influences the model's final answer.<n>OAR-G achieves comparable gains with negligible computational overhead, both significantly outperforming a strong GRPO baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T10:48:02Z)
• Segmental Advantage Estimation: Enhancing PPO for Long-Context LLM Training [17.530233901658253]
  Segmental Advantage Estimation mitigates the bias that Generalized Advantage Estimation can incur in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards.<n> SAE achieves superior performance, with marked improvements in final scores, stability, and sample efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T08:41:47Z)
• CARE What Fails: Contrastive Anchored-REflection for Verifiable Multimodal [84.71254539482369]
  Group-relative reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) often wastes the most informative data it already has the failures.<n>We present CARE, a failure-centric post-training framework for multimodal reasoning that turns errors into supervision.<n> CARE improves accuracy and training smoothness while explicitly increasing the share of learning signal that comes from failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T16:34:21Z)
• Anchoring Values in Temporal and Group Dimensions for Flow Matching Model Alignment [61.80228667422234]
  VGPO redefines value estimation across both temporal and group dimensions.<n>It transforms the sparse terminal reward into dense, process-aware value estimates.<n>It replaces standard group normalization with a novel process enhanced by absolute values to maintain a stable optimization signal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T16:31:26Z)
• DisCO: Reinforcing Large Reasoning Models with Discriminative Constrained Optimization [50.91849555841057]
  Group Relative Policy Optimization is a reinforcement learning method for large reasoning models (LRMs)<n>We introduce a new Discriminative Constrained Optimization framework for reinforcing LRMs, grounded in the principle of discriminative learning.<n>DisCO significantly outperforms GRPO and its improved variants such as DAPO, achieving average gains of 7% over GRPO and 6% over DAPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T11:08:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.