Pareto-Guided Optimal Transport for Multi-Reward Alignment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13155v1
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 08:19:48 GMT
- Title: Pareto-Guided Optimal Transport for Multi-Reward Alignment
- Abstract summary: We show how to optimize against a unified global target under heterogeneous reward upper bounds.<n>We develop both online and offline optimization strategies tailored to diverse reward signal characteristics.<n>Our approach outperforms strong baselines with an 11% gain in Joint Domination Rate (JDR) and achieves a near 80% win rate in human evaluations.
- Score: 59.776579791864805
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Text-to-image generation models have achieved remarkable progress in preference optimization, yet achieving robust alignment across diverse reward models remains a significant challenge. Existing multi-reward fusion approaches rely on weighted summation, which is costly to tune and insufficient for balancing conflicting objectives. More critically, optimization with reward models is highly susceptible to reward hacking, where reward scores increase while the perceived quality of generated images deteriorates. We demonstrate that optimizing against a unified global target under heterogeneous reward upper bounds can induce reward hacking, a risk further exacerbated by the inherent instability of weak reward models. To mitigate this, we propose a Pareto Frontier-Guided Optimal Transport (PG-OT) framework. Our method constructs a prompt-specific Pareto frontier and maps dominated samples toward it via distribution-aware optimal transport. Furthermore, we develop both online and offline optimization strategies tailored to diverse reward signal characteristics. To provide a more rigorous assessment, we introduce the Joint Domination Rate (JDR) and Joint Collapse Rate (JCR) as principled metrics to quantify multi-reward synergy and reward hacking. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms strong baselines with an 11% gain in JDR and achieves a near 80% win rate in human evaluations.
Related papers
- RSPO: Reward-Swap Policy Optimization for Multi-Turn LLM Agents [24.215311212134882]
We propose Reward-Swap Policy Optimization (RSPO) to leverage the rich information from dense process rewards to facilitate training with outcome rewards.<n>RSPO ensures the diversity of sampled trajectories while guaranteeing consistency between the optimization objective and the true outcome rewards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-06T06:32:39Z) - TMPO: Trajectory Matching Policy Optimization for Diverse and Efficient Diffusion Alignment [52.570581883709345]
We propose Trajectory Matching Policy Balance Optimization (TMPO), which replaces reward with human-level reward distribution matching.<n>TMPO improves generative diversity over state-of-the-art methods by 9.1%, and achieves competitive performance in all downstream and efficiency metrics.<n>To further reduce multi-trajectory training time on large-scale flow- prefixes, TMPO incorporates Dynamic Tree Sampling models, where trajectories share denoising and branch at dynamically scheduled steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-09T04:41:02Z) - Reward Score Matching: Unifying Reward-based Fine-tuning for Flow and Diffusion Models [54.597200388738656]
Reward-based fine-tuning aims to steer a pretrained diffusion or flow-based generative model toward higher-reward samples.<n>We show that many can be written under a common framework, which we call reward score matching (RSM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-19T12:47:52Z) - Adaptive Milestone Reward for GUI Agents [38.548364518806046]
We propose the Adaptive Milestone Reward (ADMIRE) mechanism.<n>ADMIRE constructs a verifiable, adaptive reward system by anchoring trajectory to milestones.<n>Experiments demonstrate that ADMIRE consistently yields over 10% absolute improvement in success rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T03:31:40Z) - GARDO: Reinforcing Diffusion Models without Reward Hacking [54.841464430913476]
Fine-tuning diffusion models via online reinforcement learning (RL) has shown great potential for enhancing text-to-image alignment.<n>The mismatch often leads to reward hacking, where proxy scores increase while real image quality deteriorates and generation diversity collapses.<n>We propose Gated and Adaptive Regularization with Diversity-aware Optimization (GARDO) to address the competing demands of sample efficiency, effective exploration, and mitigation of reward hacking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-30T10:55:45Z) - Overcoming Reward Overoptimization via Adversarial Policy Optimization with Lightweight Uncertainty Estimation [46.61909578101735]
Adversarial Policy Optimization (AdvPO) is a novel solution to the pervasive issue of reward over-optimization in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback.
In this paper, we introduce a lightweight way to quantify uncertainties in rewards, relying solely on the last layer embeddings of the reward model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T09:20:12Z) - Mind the Gap: Offline Policy Optimization for Imperfect Rewards [14.874900923808408]
We propose a unified offline policy optimization approach, textitRGM (Reward Gap Minimization), which can handle diverse types of imperfect rewards.
By exploiting the duality of the lower layer, we derive a tractable algorithm that enables sampled-based learning without any online interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-03T11:39:50Z) - Policy Gradient Bayesian Robust Optimization for Imitation Learning [49.881386773269746]
We derive a novel policy gradient-style robust optimization approach, PG-BROIL, to balance expected performance and risk.
Results suggest PG-BROIL can produce a family of behaviors ranging from risk-neutral to risk-averse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-11T16:49:15Z) - DORB: Dynamically Optimizing Multiple Rewards with Bandits [101.68525259222164]
Policy-based reinforcement learning has proven to be a promising approach for optimizing non-differentiable evaluation metrics for language generation tasks.
We use the Exp3 algorithm for bandits and formulate two approaches for bandit rewards: (1) Single Multi-reward Bandit (SM-Bandit); (2) Hierarchical Multi-reward Bandit (HM-Bandit)
We empirically show the effectiveness of our approaches via various automatic metrics and human evaluation on two important NLG tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-15T21:57:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.