Towards a holistic understanding of Selection Bias for Causal Effect Identification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13430v1
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 12:24:34 GMT
• Title: Towards a holistic understanding of Selection Bias for Causal Effect Identification
• Abstract summary: We investigate the identifiability of the average treatment effects (ATE) under selection bias.<n>We leverage weak assumptions on probability classes to characterize propensity score and selection probability.
• Score: 27.51002790973783
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Selection bias is pervasive in observational studies. For example, large scale biobanks data can exhibit ``healthy volunteer bias'' when respondents are healthier and of higher socio-economic status than the population they are meant to represent. Recovering causal effects from such sub-population is an important problem in causal inference, as estimating average treatment effects (ATE) from selected populations can result in a severely biased estimate of the ATE from the whole population. In this paper, we investigate the identifiability of the ATE under selection bias. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for ATE identifiability, leveraging weak assumptions on probability classes to characterize propensity score and selection probability. Compared to previous works, our results extend existing graphical identifiability criteria and offer a more comprehensive understanding of causal effect identification with strictly weaker conditions in the presence of selection bias.

Related papers

• Selective Mixup for Debiasing Question Selection in Computerized Adaptive Testing [50.805231979748434]
  Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) is a widely used technology for evaluating learners' proficiency in online education platforms.<n> Selection Bias arises because the question selection is strongly influenced by the estimated proficiency.<n>We propose a debiasing framework consisting of two key modules: Cross-Attribute Examinee Retrieval and Selective Mixup-based Regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T08:55:01Z)
• Testing Identifiability and Transportability with Observational and Experimental Data [3.922842284927803]
  We propose a method for assessing whether Z-specific (conditional) causal effects are both identifiable and transportable.<n>Our method combines experimental data from the source population with observational data from the target population to compute the probability that a causal effect is both identifiable from observational data and transportable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T07:31:56Z)
• Detecting and Identifying Selection Structure in Sequential Data [53.24493902162797]
  We argue that the selective inclusion of data points based on latent objectives is common in practical situations, such as music sequences. We show that selection structure is identifiable without any parametric assumptions or interventional experiments. We also propose a provably correct algorithm to detect and identify selection structures as well as other types of dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T20:56:34Z)
• Causality and Independence Enhancement for Biased Node Classification [56.38828085943763]
  We propose a novel Causality and Independence Enhancement (CIE) framework, applicable to various graph neural networks (GNNs) Our approach estimates causal and spurious features at the node representation level and mitigates the influence of spurious correlations. Our approach CIE not only significantly enhances the performance of GNNs but outperforms state-of-the-art debiased node classification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T13:56:24Z)
• Bounding Counterfactuals under Selection Bias [60.55840896782637]
  We propose a first algorithm to address both identifiable and unidentifiable queries. We prove that, in spite of the missingness induced by the selection bias, the likelihood of the available data is unimodal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-26T10:33:10Z)
• Statistical discrimination in learning agents [64.78141757063142]
  Statistical discrimination emerges in agent policies as a function of both the bias in the training population and of agent architecture. We show that less discrimination emerges with agents that use recurrent neural networks, and when their training environment has less bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T18:28:57Z)
• Typing assumptions improve identification in causal discovery [123.06886784834471]
  Causal discovery from observational data is a challenging task to which an exact solution cannot always be identified. We propose a new set of assumptions that constrain possible causal relationships based on the nature of the variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T14:23:08Z)
• Causes of Effects: Learning individual responses from population data [23.593582720307207]
  We study the problem of individualization and its applications in medicine. For example, the probability of benefiting from a treatment concerns an individual having a favorable outcome if treated and an unfavorable outcome if untreated. We analyze and expand on existing research by applying bounds to the probability of necessity and sufficiency (PNS) along with graphical criteria and practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T12:38:11Z)
• A Review of Generalizability and Transportability [0.18275108630751835]
  Estimates from randomized data may have internal validity but are often not representative of the target population. Observational data may better reflect the target population, and hence be more likely to have external validity, but are subject to potential bias due to unmeasured confounding. This paper presents a framework for addressing external validity bias, including a synthesis of approaches for generalizability and transportability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T19:34:13Z)
• Causal Inference With Selectively Deconfounded Data [22.624714904663424]
  We consider the benefit of incorporating a large confounded observational dataset (confounder unobserved) alongside a small deconfounded observational dataset (confounder revealed) when estimating the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) Our theoretical results suggest that the inclusion of confounded data can significantly reduce the quantity of deconfounded data required to estimate the ATE to within a desired accuracy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T18:46:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.