Testing Identifiability and Transportability with Observational and Experimental Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12801v1
• Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 07:31:56 GMT
• Title: Testing Identifiability and Transportability with Observational and Experimental Data
• Abstract summary: We propose a method for assessing whether Z-specific (conditional) causal effects are both identifiable and transportable.<n>Our method combines experimental data from the source population with observational data from the target population to compute the probability that a causal effect is both identifiable from observational data and transportable.
• Score: 3.922842284927803
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Transporting causal information learned from experiments in one population to another is a critical challenge in clinical research and decision-making. Causal transportability uses causal graphs to model differences between the source and target populations and identifies conditions under which causal effects learned from experiments can be reused in a different population. Similarly, causal identifiability identifies conditions under which causal effects can be estimated from observational data. However, these approaches rely on knowing the causal graph, which is often unavailable in real-world settings. In this work, we propose a Bayesian method for assessing whether Z-specific (conditional) causal effects are both identifiable and transportable, without knowing the causal graph. Our method combines experimental data from the source population with observational data from the target population to compute the probability that a causal effect is both identifiable from observational data and transportable. When this holds, we leverage both observational data from the target domain and experimental data from the source domain to obtain an unbiased, efficient estimator of the causal effect in the target population. Using simulations, we demonstrate that our method correctly identifies transportable causal effects and improves causal effect estimation.

Related papers

• Causal Graph Learning via Distributional Invariance of Cause-Effect Relationship [54.575090553659074]
  We develop an algorithm that efficiently uncovers causal relationships with quadratic complexity in the number of observational variables.<n>Our experiments on a varied benchmark of large-scale datasets show superior or equivalent performance compared to existing works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T10:26:16Z)
• Do-PFN: In-Context Learning for Causal Effect Estimation [75.62771416172109]
  We show that Prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) can be pre-trained on synthetic data to predict outcomes.<n>Our approach allows for the accurate estimation of causal effects without knowledge of the underlying causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T12:43:57Z)
• Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects [62.56890808004615]
  We propose a novel partial identification framework that enables researchers to answer key questions.<n>Is the causal effect positive or negative? and How severe must assumption violations be to overturn this conclusion?<n>We apply our framework to the Project STAR study, which investigates the effect of classroom size on students' third-grade standardized test performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T07:13:01Z)
• Doubly robust identification of treatment effects from multiple environments [22.228179404621482]
  We propose RAMEN, an algorithm that produces unbiased treatment effect estimates without the need to know or learn the underlying causal graph.<n> RAMEN achieves doubly robust identification: it can identify the treatment effect whenever the causal parents of the treatment or those of the outcome are observed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T17:33:10Z)
• Smoke and Mirrors in Causal Downstream Tasks [59.90654397037007]
  This paper looks at the causal inference task of treatment effect estimation, where the outcome of interest is recorded in high-dimensional observations.<n>We compare 6 480 models fine-tuned from state-of-the-art visual backbones, and find that the sampling and modeling choices significantly affect the accuracy of the causal estimate.<n>Our results suggest that future benchmarks should carefully consider real downstream scientific questions, especially causal ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T13:26:34Z)
• Identifiability of Sparse Causal Effects using Instrumental Variables [11.97552507834888]
  In this paper, we consider linear models in which the causal effect from covariables $X$ on a response $Y$ is sparse. We provide conditions under which the causal coefficient becomes identifiable from the observed distribution. As an estimator, we propose spaceIV and prove that it consistently estimates the causal effect if the model is identifiable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T15:15:52Z)
• Causal Effect Estimation using Variational Information Bottleneck [19.6760527269791]
  Causal inference is to estimate the causal effect in a causal relationship when intervention is applied. We propose a method to estimate Causal Effect by using Variational Information Bottleneck (CEVIB)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T13:46:12Z)
• Typing assumptions improve identification in causal discovery [123.06886784834471]
  Causal discovery from observational data is a challenging task to which an exact solution cannot always be identified. We propose a new set of assumptions that constrain possible causal relationships based on the nature of the variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-22T14:23:08Z)
• Adaptive Multi-Source Causal Inference [21.590496842692747]
  We leverage additional source datasets which share similar causal mechanisms with the target observations to help infer causal effects of the target population. We propose three levels of knowledge transfer, through modelling the outcomes, treatments, and confounders. The proposed method can infer causal effects in the target population without prior knowledge of data discrepancy between the additional data sources and the target.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T11:02:37Z)
• An introduction to causal reasoning in health analytics [2.199093822766999]
  We will try to highlight some of the drawbacks that may arise in traditional machine learning and statistical approaches to analyze the observational data. We will demonstrate the applications of causal inference in tackling some common machine learning issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T20:25:56Z)
• Causes of Effects: Learning individual responses from population data [23.593582720307207]
  We study the problem of individualization and its applications in medicine. For example, the probability of benefiting from a treatment concerns an individual having a favorable outcome if treated and an unfavorable outcome if untreated. We analyze and expand on existing research by applying bounds to the probability of necessity and sufficiency (PNS) along with graphical criteria and practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T12:38:11Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.