Quantitative Linear Logic for Neuro-Symbolic Learning and Verification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13845v2
• Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 17:00:29 GMT
• Title: Quantitative Linear Logic for Neuro-Symbolic Learning and Verification
• Abstract summary: Differentiable Logics are deployed in neuro-symbolic learning tasks as a way of embedding logical constraints in the training objective of neural networks.<n>A defining trade-off of the field is that between logical properties of the connectives, and analytic concerns for the semantics.<n>We propose a resolution to this long-standing tension via a novel logic, Quantitative Linear Logic.
• Score: 0.6299766708197881
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Differentiable Logics are deployed in neuro-symbolic learning tasks as a way of embedding logical constraints in the training objective of neural networks. A differentiable logic consists of a syntax to write logical properties and a semantics to interpret them as real-valued functions to be folded in the loss function. A defining trade-off of the field is that between logical properties of the connectives, and analytic concerns for the semantics, with both aspects being relevant in applications. At one extreme we find fuzzy logics, that have well-established algebraic and proof-theoretic foundations, and at the other ad-hoc differentiable logics like Fischer's DL2, conceived for deep learning applications. However, no satisfactory foundation has emerged yet. We propose a resolution to this long-standing tension via a novel logic, Quantitative Linear Logic (QLL), with foundational ambitions. Our design is driven by naturality -- the idea that, since logical constraints are translated to losses, the semantics of the connectives should be pertinent operations used in ML practice (that is, sum and log-sum-exp) on additive quantities (like logits). We then judge the result on two aspects: logical adequacy -- that they satisfy most of the standard logical laws of Linear Logic; and empirical effectiveness -- test-time performance (as measured by adversarial attacks) is well-correlated to the actual verification of the logical constraints (as measured by off-the-shelf neural network verifiers), which makes QLL stand out among SoTA techniques.

Related papers

• Logic-Parametric Neuro-Symbolic NLI: Controlling Logical Formalisms for Verifiable LLM Reasoning [13.291627429657412]
  We propose a logic-parametric framework for neuro-symbolic natural language inference.<n>We embed a range of classical and non-classical formalisms into higher-order logic.<n>We show that logic-internal strategies can consistently improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T10:47:30Z)
• Logic Unseen: Revealing the Logical Blindspots of Vision-Language Models [58.456656119178064]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have emerged as foundational for multimodal intelligence.<n>However, their capacity for logical understanding remains significantly underexplored.<n>We introduce LogicBench, a benchmark with over 50,000 vision-language pairs across 9 logical categories and 4 diverse scenarios.<n>We propose LogicCLIP, a training framework designed to boost VLMs' logical sensitivity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T08:40:13Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Contrastive Learning for Cross-domain Inference [13.649270716741535]
  inductive logic programming (ILP) excels at inferring logical relationships across diverse, sparse and limited datasets.<n>This paper proposes a bridge between the two approaches: neuro-symbolic contrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T11:48:46Z)
• LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and Reasoning [73.98142349171552]
  LOGICSEG is a holistic visual semantic that integrates neural inductive learning and logic reasoning with both rich data and symbolic knowledge. During fuzzy logic-based continuous relaxation, logical formulae are grounded onto data and neural computational graphs, hence enabling logic-induced network training. These designs together make LOGICSEG a general and compact neural-logic machine that is readily integrated into existing segmentation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T05:43:19Z)
• Modeling Hierarchical Reasoning Chains by Linking Discourse Units and Key Phrases for Reading Comprehension [80.99865844249106]
  We propose a holistic graph network (HGN) which deals with context at both discourse level and word level, as the basis for logical reasoning. Specifically, node-level and type-level relations, which can be interpreted as bridges in the reasoning process, are modeled by a hierarchical interaction mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T07:34:27Z)
• Discourse-Aware Graph Networks for Textual Logical Reasoning [142.0097357999134]
  Passage-level logical relations represent entailment or contradiction between propositional units (e.g., a concluding sentence) We propose logic structural-constraint modeling to solve the logical reasoning QA and introduce discourse-aware graph networks (DAGNs) The networks first construct logic graphs leveraging in-line discourse connectives and generic logic theories, then learn logic representations by end-to-end evolving the logic relations with an edge-reasoning mechanism and updating the graph features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T14:38:49Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Inductive Logic Programming with Logical Neural Networks [65.23508422635862]
  We propose learning rules with the recently proposed logical neural networks (LNN) Compared to others, LNNs offer strong connection to classical Boolean logic. Our experiments on standard benchmarking tasks confirm that LNN rules are highly interpretable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-06T19:38:30Z)
• Neural Logic Reasoning [47.622957656745356]
  We propose Logic-Integrated Neural Network (LINN) to integrate the power of deep learning and logic reasoning. LINN learns basic logical operations such as AND, OR, NOT as neural modules, and conducts propositional logical reasoning through the network for inference. Experiments show that LINN significantly outperforms state-of-the-art recommendation models in Top-K recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T14:53:23Z)
• Logical Neural Networks [51.46602187496816]
  We propose a novel framework seamlessly providing key properties of both neural nets (learning) and symbolic logic (knowledge and reasoning) Every neuron has a meaning as a component of a formula in a weighted real-valued logic, yielding a highly intepretable disentangled representation. Inference is omni rather than focused on predefined target variables, and corresponds to logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T16:55:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.