From Descriptive to Prescriptive: Uncover the Social Value Alignment of LLM-based Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14034v1
• Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 18:50:22 GMT
• Title: From Descriptive to Prescriptive: Uncover the Social Value Alignment of LLM-based Agents
• Abstract summary: We use GraphRAG to convert principles into value-based instructions and steer the agent to behave as expected.<n>Our method provides a basis for the emergence of self-emotion in AI systems.
• Score: 1.6296214703392398
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Wide applications of LLM-based agents require strong alignment with human social values. However, current works still exhibit deficiencies in self-cognition and dilemma decision, as well as self-emotions. To remedy this, we propose a novel value-based framework that employs GraphRAG to convert principles into value-based instructions and steer the agent to behave as expected by retrieving the suitable instruction upon a specific conversation context. To evaluate the ratio of expected behaviors, we define the expected behaviors from two famous theories, Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and Plutchik's Wheel of Emotion. By experimenting with our method on the benchmark of DAILYDILEMMAS, our method exhibits significant performance gains compared to prompt-based baselines, including ECoT, Plan-and-Solve, and Metacognitive prompting. Our method provides a basis for the emergence of self-emotion in AI systems.

Related papers

• From Holistic Evaluation to Structured Criteria: Rubrics Across the Evolving LLM Landscape [79.30826980815927]
  rubrics are explicit criteria sets that transform complex quality judgments into structured and actionable standards.<n>We systematically organize existing rubric designs, examine their construction and optimization, and analyze their role across evaluation and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-07T13:34:55Z)
• Bridging Values and Behavior: A Hierarchical Framework for Proactive Embodied Agents [26.613956143957548]
  textitValuePlanner is a hierarchical cognitive architecture that decouples high-level value scheduling from low-level action execution.<n>Our work offers a structured approach to bridging intrinsic values and grounded behavior for autonomous agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T10:43:55Z)
• Generative Psycho-Lexical Approach for Constructing Value Systems in Large Language Models [22.91793944714941]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have raised concerns regarding their elusive intrinsic values.<n>This study addresses the gap by introducing the Generative Psycho-Lexical Approach (GPLA)<n>We propose a psychologically grounded five-factor value system tailored for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T16:10:55Z)
• SelfPrompt: Autonomously Evaluating LLM Robustness via Domain-Constrained Knowledge Guidelines and Refined Adversarial Prompts [0.6291443816903801]
  This paper introduces a novel framework designed to autonomously evaluate the robustness of large language models (LLMs)<n>Our method generates descriptive sentences from domain-constrained knowledge graph triplets to formulate adversarial prompts.<n>This self-evaluation mechanism allows the LLM to evaluate its robustness without the need for external benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-01T10:58:53Z)
• IDEA: Enhancing the Rule Learning Ability of Large Language Model Agent through Induction, Deduction, and Abduction [3.961279440272764]
  We introduce RULEARN to assess the rule-learning abilities of large language models in interactive settings.<n>We propose IDEA, a novel reasoning framework that integrates the process of Induction, Deduction, and Abduction.<n>Our evaluation of the IDEA framework, which involves five representative LLMs, demonstrates significant improvements over the baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T23:37:07Z)
• Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology [76.64402390208576]
  Modern language models (LMs) pose a new challenge in capability assessment. To be confident in our metrics, we need a new discipline of model metrology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T17:52:12Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.<n>We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.<n>Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• Learning and Calibrating Heterogeneous Bounded Rational Market Behaviour with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [4.40301653518681]
  Agent-based models (ABMs) have shown promise for modelling various real world phenomena incompatible with traditional equilibrium analysis. Recent developments in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) offer a way to address this issue from a rationality perspective. We propose a novel technique for representing heterogeneous processing-constrained agents within a MARL framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T17:21:45Z)
• Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactions [99.39979111807388]
  Social alignment in AI systems aims to ensure that these models behave according to established societal values. Current language models (LMs) are trained to rigidly replicate their training corpus in isolation. This work presents a novel training paradigm that permits LMs to learn from simulated social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T14:17:36Z)
• Heterogeneous Value Alignment Evaluation for Large Language Models [91.96728871418]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have made it crucial to align their values with those of humans. We propose a Heterogeneous Value Alignment Evaluation (HVAE) system to assess the success of aligning LLMs with heterogeneous values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T02:34:20Z)
• Automated Machine Learning, Bounded Rationality, and Rational Metareasoning [62.997667081978825]
  We will look at automated machine learning (AutoML) and related problems from the perspective of bounded rationality. Taking actions under bounded resources requires an agent to reflect on how to use these resources in an optimal way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T09:10:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.