Identifying Culprits Through Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Deep Learning Investigation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14774v1
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 12:39:17 GMT
- Title: Identifying Culprits Through Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient Deep Learning Investigation
- Abstract summary: This research focuses on a Conventional ways of implicating criminal investigations usually rely on limited data analysis.<n>The main novelty approach of this work is based on the deep learning algorithm Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG)<n>We show the efficacy of the proposed method, where DDPG identified criminals with an amazing accuracy of 95%.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In the world of AI and advanced technologies investigation aspects identification of a crime or criminal plays a major problem. In this research we focus on a Conventional ways of implicating criminal investigations usually rely on limited data analysis. Finding an optimal and efficient method that will effectively identify criminals from complex datasets and minimise false positives and false negatives is the considered as a challenge. The main novelty approach of this work is based on the deep learning algorithm Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) is presented in this paper. We train the DDPG model with a dataset of crime scene material, witness statements and suspect profiles. The algorithm uses features to maximise the likelihood of identifying the offender while minimising the noise impact and irrelevant data. We show the efficacy of the proposed method, where DDPG identified criminals with an amazing accuracy of 95% than other several existing methods.
Related papers
- Predictive Hotspot Mapping for Data-driven Crime Prediction [0.38221075127979987]
We create a non-temporal kernel model for the purpose of crime prediction based on historical data.<n>The proposed approach is also able to incorporate expert inputs coming from humans through alternate sources.<n>The results obtained in the paper are promising and can be easily applied in other settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T07:26:02Z) - To Search or Not to Search: Aligning the Decision Boundary of Deep Search Agents via Causal Intervention [61.82680155643223]
We identify the root cause of misaligned decision boundaries, the threshold determining when accumulated information suffices to answer.<n>This causes over-search (redundant searching despite sufficient knowledge) and under-search (premature termination yielding incorrect answers.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework comprising two key components. First, we introduce causal intervention-based diagnosis that identifies boundary errors.<n>Second, we develop Decision Boundary Alignment for Deep Search agents (DAS)<n>Our DAS method effectively calibrates these boundaries, mitigating both over-search and under-search to achieve substantial gains in accuracy and efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T09:29:06Z) - GradID: Adversarial Detection via Intrinsic Dimensionality of Gradients [0.1019561860229868]
In this paper, we investigate the geometric properties of a model's input loss landscape.<n>We reveal a distinct and consistent difference in the ID for natural and adversarial data, which forms the basis of our proposed detection method.<n>Our detector significantly surpasses existing methods against a wide array of attacks, including CW and AutoAttack, achieving detection rates consistently above 92% on CIFAR-10.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-14T20:16:03Z) - Benchmarking Fraud Detectors on Private Graph Data [70.4654745317714]
Currently, many types of fraud are managed in part by automated detection algorithms that operate over graphs.<n>We consider the scenario where a data holder wishes to outsource development of fraud detectors to third parties.<n>Third parties submit their fraud detectors to the data holder, who evaluates these algorithms on a private dataset and then publicly communicates the results.<n>We propose a realistic privacy attack on this system that allows an adversary to de-anonymize individuals' data based only on the evaluation results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-30T03:20:15Z) - DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspective [70.77570343385928]
We introduce a novel taxonomy, classifying existing methods based on their reliance on internal features (IF) (inherent to the data) versus external features (EF) (artificially introduced for auditing)<n>We formulate two primary attack types: evasion attacks, designed to conceal the use of a dataset, and forgery attacks, intending to falsely implicate an unused dataset.<n>Building on the understanding of existing methods and attack objectives, we further propose systematic attack strategies: decoupling, removal, and detection for evasion; adversarial example-based methods for forgery.<n>Our benchmark, DATABench, comprises 17 evasion attacks, 5 forgery attacks, and 9
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-08T03:07:15Z) - Probing Deep into Temporal Profile Makes the Infrared Small Target Detector Much Better [63.567886330598945]
Infrared small target (IRST) detection is challenging in simultaneously achieving precise, universal, robust and efficient performance.<n>Current learning-based methods attempt to leverage more" information from both the spatial and the short-term temporal domains.<n>We propose an efficient deep temporal probe network (DeepPro) that only performs calculations in the time dimension for IRST detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-15T08:19:32Z) - Facial Forgery-based Deepfake Detection using Fine-Grained Features [7.378937711027777]
Facial forgery by deepfakes has caused major security risks and raised severe societal concerns.
We formulate deepfake detection as a fine-grained classification problem and propose a new fine-grained solution to it.
Our method is based on learning subtle and generalizable features by effectively suppressing background noise and learning discriminative features at various scales for deepfake detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-10T21:30:05Z) - CrossDF: Improving Cross-Domain Deepfake Detection with Deep Information Decomposition [53.860796916196634]
We propose a Deep Information Decomposition (DID) framework to enhance the performance of Cross-dataset Deepfake Detection (CrossDF)
Unlike most existing deepfake detection methods, our framework prioritizes high-level semantic features over specific visual artifacts.
It adaptively decomposes facial features into deepfake-related and irrelevant information, only using the intrinsic deepfake-related information for real/fake discrimination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-30T12:30:25Z) - Data AUDIT: Identifying Attribute Utility- and Detectability-Induced
Bias in Task Models [8.420252576694583]
We present a first technique for the rigorous, quantitative screening of medical image datasets.
Our method decomposes the risks associated with dataset attributes in terms of their detectability and utility.
Using our method, we show our screening method reliably identifies nearly imperceptible bias-inducing artifacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T16:50:15Z) - Weakly Supervised Anomaly Detection: A Survey [75.26180038443462]
Anomaly detection (AD) is a crucial task in machine learning with various applications.
We present the first comprehensive survey of weakly supervised anomaly detection (WSAD) methods.
For each setting, we provide formal definitions, key algorithms, and potential future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-09T10:27:21Z) - The Proximal ID Algorithm [9.190358641395848]
Unobserved confounding is a fundamental obstacle to establishing valid causal conclusions from observational data.
We develop a synthesis of the former and latter approaches to identification in causal inference.
Our approach allows us to systematically exploit proxies to adjust for the presence of unobserved confounders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-15T21:32:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.