CTF4Nuclear: Common Task Framework for Nuclear Fission and Fusion Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15549v1
• Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 02:42:26 GMT
• Title: CTF4Nuclear: Common Task Framework for Nuclear Fission and Fusion Models
• Abstract summary: We introduce a Common Task Framework (CTF) for Machine Learning in nuclear engineering.<n>This CTF considers a curated set of datasets from different nuclear and nuclear-adjacent systems.<n>We illustrate the framework by benchmarking standard ML baselines against these datasets.
• Score: 4.752729446149405
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The demand for clean energy is ever increasing, with new nuclear technologies presenting a complementary solution to renewable energies. However, designing and operating these systems is exceptionally difficult, given the complexity of the physical phenomena that interact to form the system dynamics. While high-fidelity simulations help to understand the non-linear, multi-physics interactions within a reactor, they are computationally expensive and rarely suitable for real-time applications. Furthermore, model-based approaches are inherently sensitive to simplifying assumptions required to derive their governing equations and parameters, leading to inevitable discrepancies with real-world measurements. In contrast, Machine Learning (ML) methods have the potential to generate reliable surrogate models which may be able to quickly predict the system's behaviour. However, the number of data-driven methods that can potentially be used for this task is large and diverse. In a safety-critical setting such as nuclear engineering, a fair comparison of different ML methods, and a clear understanding of their advantages and limitations, is of paramount importance. To address this, we introduce a Common Task Framework (CTF) for ML in nuclear engineering, building upon previous efforts in dynamical systems and seismology. This CTF considers a curated set of datasets from different nuclear and nuclear-adjacent systems. The CTF evaluates the performance of a method on 12 established metrics, alongside a new paradigm focused on system monitoring from sparse measurements only. We illustrate the framework by benchmarking standard ML baselines against these datasets, revealing current method limitations. Our vision is to replace ad hoc comparisons with standardized evaluations on hidden test sets, raising the bar for rigour and reproducibility in scientific ML for the nuclear industry.

Related papers

• Hierarchical Inference and Closure Learning via Adaptive Surrogates for ODEs and PDEs [15.38864225184245]
  Inverse problems are the task of calibrating models to match data.<n>We develop a principled methodology for leveraging data from collections of distinct yet related physical systems.<n>We learn the shared unknown dynamics in the form of an ML-based closure model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T10:30:08Z)
• TokaMark: A Comprehensive Benchmark for MAST Tokamak Plasma Models [56.94569090844015]
  TokaMark is a structured benchmark to evaluate AI models on real experimental data collected from the Mega Ampere Spherical Tokamak (MAST)<n>TokaMark aims to accelerate progress in data-driven AI-based plasma modeling, contributing to the broader goal of achieving sustainable and stable fusion energy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T16:49:44Z)
• Opportunities in AI/ML for the Rubin LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration [63.61423859450929]
  This white paper surveys the current landscape of AI/ML across DESC's primary cosmological probes and cross-cutting analyses.<n>We identify key methodological research priorities, including Bayesian inference at scale, physics-informed methods, validation frameworks, and active learning for discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T18:46:42Z)
• AI-NativeBench: An Open-Source White-Box Agentic Benchmark Suite for AI-Native Systems [52.65695508605237]
  We introduce AI-NativeBench, the first application-centric and white-box AI-Native benchmark suite grounded in Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) standards.<n>By treating agentic spans as first-class citizens within distributed traces, our methodology enables granular analysis of engineering characteristics beyond simple capabilities.<n>This work provides the first systematic evidence to guide the transition from measuring model capability to engineering reliable AI-Native systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T11:32:07Z)
• Combining Entropy and Matrix Nuclear Norm for Enhanced Evaluation of Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, the need for precise and efficient evaluation metrics becomes more pressing. Traditional approaches, while informative, often face limitations in computational demands and interpretability. In this paper, we introduce a novel hybrid evaluation method that integrates two established techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T14:03:52Z)
• Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology [76.64402390208576]
  Modern language models (LMs) pose a new challenge in capability assessment. To be confident in our metrics, we need a new discipline of model metrology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T17:52:12Z)
• Optimal design of experiments in the context of machine-learning inter-atomic potentials: improving the efficiency and transferability of kernel based methods [0.7234862895932991]
  Data-driven, machine learning (ML) models of atomistic interactions can relate nuanced aspects of atomic arrangements into predictions of energies and forces. The main challenge stems from the fact that descriptors of chemical environments are often sparse high-dimensional objects without a well-defined continuous metric. We will demonstrate that classical concepts of statistical planning of experiments and optimal design can help to mitigate such problems at a relatively low computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T14:14:23Z)
• An Extensible Benchmark Suite for Learning to Simulate Physical Systems [60.249111272844374]
  We introduce a set of benchmark problems to take a step towards unified benchmarks and evaluation protocols. We propose four representative physical systems, as well as a collection of both widely used classical time-based and representative data-driven methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-09T17:39:09Z)
• Using Data Assimilation to Train a Hybrid Forecast System that Combines Machine-Learning and Knowledge-Based Components [52.77024349608834]
  We consider the problem of data-assisted forecasting of chaotic dynamical systems when the available data is noisy partial measurements. We show that by using partial measurements of the state of the dynamical system, we can train a machine learning model to improve predictions made by an imperfect knowledge-based model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T19:56:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.