Few-Shot Large Language Models for Actionable Triage Categorization of Online Patient Inquiries

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15680v1
• Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 07:02:17 GMT
• Title: Few-Shot Large Language Models for Actionable Triage Categorization of Online Patient Inquiries
• Abstract summary: Online patient inquiries are often informal, incomplete, and written before professional assessment, yet they must still be routed to an appropriate level of clinical follow-up.<n>We study this as a four-class actionable triage task -- self-care, schedule-visit, urgent-clinician-review, or emergency-referral.<n>We ask whether prompted large language models (LLMs) can support such routing under low-resource labeling conditions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Online patient inquiries are often informal, incomplete, and written before professional assessment, yet they must still be routed to an appropriate level of clinical follow-up. We study this as a four-class actionable triage task -- self-care, schedule-visit, urgent-clinician-review, or emergency-referral, and ask whether prompted large language models (LLMs) can support such routing under low-resource labeling conditions. Using the public HealthCareMagic-100K corpus, we construct a 300-example human calibrated gold evaluation set, a 700-example auto-labeled silver training set, and a 40-example few-shot pool. We compare Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers for Biomedical Text Mining (BioBERT) baselines train on silver labels against six prompted LLMs under 0-shot, 4-shot, and 12-shot conditions respectively. Accordingly, we evaluate with macro-$F_1$ alongside safety-aware metrics, including emergency-recall, under-triage rate, and severe under-triage rate. The strongest LLM (Claude Haiku 4.5, 12-shot) reaches macro-$F_1$ 0.475, exceeding the best supervised baseline (BioBERT, 0.378) on point estimate, with overlapping confidence intervals. Few-shot prompting and two-model agreement help in label-dependent ways: self-care agreement is reliable, urgent-clinician-review is not. We conclude that LLMs can support triage prioritization and selective human review, but not autonomous deployment.

Related papers

• ConfTriage: A Calibration-Aware LLM Triage Framework for Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy with Selective Specialist Deferral [3.306924107222105]
  We investigate whether a generalist large language model (LLM), reading only a faithful natural-language rendering of standard nodule attributes, can serve as a calibrated triage layer.<n>We propose ConfTriage, a confidence-calibrated method built on three pillars: language as the modality, calibration as the safety mechanism, and a selective specialist DL backstop for low-confidence cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T13:02:41Z)
• MedUPS: Towards Diagnostic Assistance in Uncommon Medical Cases with Large Language Models [9.0377422390685]
  MedUPSQA is a dataset of 21,874 mid-stream clinical decision points built from 5,535 real case reports.<n>MedUPS supervises models on intermediate decisions as they unfold along a patient's trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-02T05:27:21Z)
• PatientAgentBench: A Benchmark Framework for Evaluating Patient-Facing Health AI Agents [5.247635961504091]
  PatientAgentBench benchmarks patient-facing agentic healthcare.<n>It evaluates a foundation model wrapped in an agent with a sandbox of healthcare tools, conversing with a simulated patient.<n>We benchmarked 10 models across four families on the same 1,200 scenarios and found clinical gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T09:24:04Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models in Dynamic Clinical Decision-Making with Standardized Patient Cases [71.12461204050985]
  MedSP1000 is an SP-derived interactive benchmark for clinical-agent evaluation.<n>It converts peer-reviewed SP teaching cases into executable scenarios with defined SP case scripts, clinical environment contexts, and human-validated structured rubrics.<n>Applying MedSP1000 to a range of general-purpose and medically specialized LLMs, we find that performance on static benchmarks does not reliably translate to such educational scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T17:17:16Z)
• MedArena: Comparing LLMs for Medicine-in-the-Wild Clinician Preferences [50.71326426975699]
  We present MedArena, an interactive evaluation platform for medical large language models (LLMs)<n>Given a clinician-provided query, MedArena presents responses from two randomly selected models and asks the user to select the preferred response.<n>Out of 1571 preferences collected across 12 LLMs up to November 1, 2025, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and GPT-4o were the top three models by Bradley-Terry rating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T22:30:26Z)
• A Multi-Agent Framework for Medical AI: Leveraging Fine-Tuned GPT, LLaMA, and DeepSeek R1 for Evidence-Based and Bias-Aware Clinical Query Processing [0.4349324020366305]
  Large language models (LLMs) show promise for healthcare question answering, but clinical use is limited by weak verification, insufficient evidence grounding, and unreliable confidence signalling.<n>We propose a multi-agent medical QA framework that combines complementary LLMs with evidence retrieval, uncertainty estimation, and bias checks to improve answer reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T14:17:27Z)
• MLB: A Scenario-Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Clinical Applications [27.73095565539546]
  We introduce a Medical LLM Benchmark MLB, a benchmark evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on both foundational knowledge and scenario-based reasoning.<n>MLB is structured around five core dimensions: Medical Knowledge (MedKQA), Safety and Ethics (MedSE), Medical Record Understanding (MedRU), Smart Services (SmartServ), and Smart Healthcare (SmartCare)<n>Its design features a rigorous curation pipeline involving 300 licensed physicians. Besides, we provide a scalable evaluation methodology, centered on a specialized judge model trained via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on expert annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T02:41:42Z)
• Patient-Centered Summarization Framework for AI Clinical Summarization: A Mixed-Methods Design [23.21070690395588]
  We propose a new standard for Artificial Intelligence (AI) clinical summarization tasks: Patient-Centered Summaries (PCS)<n>Our objective was to develop a framework to generate PCS that capture patient values and ensure clinical utility.<n>Five open-source LLMs generated summaries for 72 consultations using zero-shot and few-shot prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T15:08:18Z)
• EchoBench: Benchmarking Sycophancy in Medical Large Vision-Language Models [82.43729208063468]
  Recent benchmarks for medical Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) emphasize leaderboard accuracy, overlooking reliability and safety.<n>We study sycophancy -- models' tendency to uncritically echo user-provided information.<n>We introduce EchoBench, a benchmark to systematically evaluate sycophancy in medical LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T14:09:55Z)
• MedOmni-45°: A Safety-Performance Benchmark for Reasoning-Oriented LLMs in Medicine [69.08855631283829]
  We introduce Med Omni-45 Degrees, a benchmark designed to quantify safety-performance trade-offs under manipulative hint conditions.<n>It contains 1,804 reasoning-focused medical questions across six specialties and three task types, including 500 from MedMCQA.<n>Results show a consistent safety-performance trade-off, with no model surpassing the diagonal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T08:38:16Z)
• VSF-Med:A Vulnerability Scoring Framework for Medical Vision-Language Models [6.390468088226493]
  We introduce VSF--Med, an end-to-end vulnerability-scoring framework for medical Vision Language Models (VLMs)<n>VSF--Med synthesizes over 30,000 adversarial variants from 5,000 radiology images and enables reproducible benchmarking of any medical VLM with a single command.<n>We show that Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct exhibits a peak vulnerability increase of $1.29sigma$ for persistence-of-attack-effects, while GPT-4o shows increases of $0.69sigma$ for that same vector and $0.28sigma$ for prompt-injection attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T02:56:38Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• MedAlign: A Clinician-Generated Dataset for Instruction Following with Electronic Medical Records [60.35217378132709]
  Large language models (LLMs) can follow natural language instructions with human-level fluency. evaluating LLMs on realistic text generation tasks for healthcare remains challenging. We introduce MedAlign, a benchmark dataset of 983 natural language instructions for EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-27T12:24:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.