LLM-Based Intelligent Notification Composition: From Static Personalization to Context-Aware Persuasive Messaging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16264v1
• Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 01:31:16 GMT
• Title: LLM-Based Intelligent Notification Composition: From Static Personalization to Context-Aware Persuasive Messaging
• Abstract summary: Push notifications are among the most direct channels through which digital platforms engage users.<n>This paper argues that message quality is an independent, underinvested lever, and that LLMs create their most differentiated value precisely at this layer.
• Score: 0.18275108630751835
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Push notifications remain among the most direct channels through which digital platforms engage users, yet existing approaches have invested heavily in who to notify, when to notify, and what to recommend, while leaving how to communicate as the least-optimized stage. This paper argues that message quality is an independent, underinvested lever, and that LLMs create their most differentiated value precisely at this layer. We make three contributions. First, we define notification message quality along six dimensions (contextual relevance, clarity, actionability, novelty handling, linguistic freshness, and persuasive appropriateness) and show how LLM-based composition improves each relative to templates. Across reviewed deployments, reported improvements range from +8% to +14.5% CTR over static templates and +1% to +2.5% over mature slot-filling systems, though these span heterogeneous systems and should not be treated as directly comparable. Second, we provide an architectural attribution analysis disentangling message generation from adjacent components (targeting, ranking, timing), arguing that observed gains are frequently misattributed to text generation alone. Third, we introduce a three-criterion decision framework specifying when LLM generation is and is not the binding constraint. We support these arguments through a PRISMA-guided survey (28 sources from 142 screened), examine domain-specific applications across social media, food delivery, and e-commerce, and propose a unified architectural framework with budget-aware routing, grounded generation, candidate ranking, diversity controls, and online learning.

Related papers

• Beyond tokens: a unified framework for latent communication in LLM-based multi-agent systems [0.65268245109828]
  Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) have become a prevailing paradigm for tackling complex reasoning, planning, and tool-use tasks.<n>The dominant communication protocol in such systems is natural language: agents exchange messages token-by-token, verbalising their internal reasoning so that peers can read, verify, and respond.<n>A growing body of work therefore explores an alternative protocol -- latent communication, in which agents exchange continuous representations directly, bypassing the bottleneck of text generation.<n>This paper presents a unified framework for organising the rapidly expanding literature on latent communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T05:10:20Z)
• On the Role of Language Representations in Auto-Bidding: Findings and Implications [9.218251193584466]
  We propose textitSemBid, a novel auto-bidding framework.<n>It injects semantic inputs into offline bidding trajectories at the token level.<n>SemBid outperforms competitive baselines from offline RL and generative sequence modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T08:08:56Z)
• AgenticTagger: Structured Item Representation for Recommendation with LLM Agents [58.12004213978182]
  AgenticTagger is a framework that queries LLMs for representing items with sequences of text descriptors.<n>To effectively and efficiently ground vocabulary in the item corpus of interest, we design a multi-agent reflection mechanism.<n>Experiments on public and private data show AgenticTagger brings consistent improvements across diverse recommendation scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T18:01:37Z)
• Who Gets Which Message? Auditing Demographic Bias in LLM-Generated Targeted Text [8.06425428468097]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of generating personalized, persuasive text at scale.<n>This paper presents the first systematic analysis of how LLMs behave when tasked with demographic-conditioned targeted messaging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T21:07:59Z)
• LAQuer: Localized Attribution Queries in Content-grounded Generation [69.60308443863606]
  Grounded text generation models often produce content that deviates from their source material, requiring user verification to ensure accuracy.<n>Existing attribution methods associate entire sentences with source documents, which can be overwhelming for users seeking to fact-check specific claims.<n>We introduce Localized Attribution Queries (LAQuer), a new task that localizes selected spans of generated output to their corresponding source spans, allowing fine-grained and user-directed attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T21:46:23Z)
• A Personalized Conversational Benchmark: Towards Simulating Personalized Conversations [112.81207927088117]
  PersonaConvBench is a benchmark for evaluating personalized reasoning and generation in multi-turn conversations with large language models (LLMs)<n>We benchmark several commercial and open-source LLMs under a unified prompting setup and observe that incorporating personalized history yields substantial performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T09:13:22Z)
• An Empirical Study on Commit Message Generation using LLMs via In-Context Learning [26.39743339039473]
  Commit messages concisely describe code changes in natural language.<n>We propose to borrow the weapon of large language models (LLMs) and in-context learning (ICL) to generate commit messages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T07:47:52Z)
• Latent Factor Models Meets Instructions: Goal-conditioned Latent Factor Discovery without Task Supervision [50.45597801390757]
  Instruct-LF is a goal-oriented latent factor discovery system.<n>It integrates instruction-following ability with statistical models to handle noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T02:03:08Z)
• SocialGPT: Prompting LLMs for Social Relation Reasoning via Greedy Segment Optimization [70.11167263638562]
  Social relation reasoning aims to identify relation categories such as friends, spouses, and colleagues from images. We first present a simple yet well-crafted framework named name, which combines the perception capability of Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) and the reasoning capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) within a modular framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T18:10:26Z)
• Enhancing LLM-Based Text Classification in Political Science: Automatic Prompt Optimization and Dynamic Exemplar Selection for Few-Shot Learning [1.6967824074619953]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer substantial promise for text classification in political science.<n>Our framework enhances LLM performance through automatic prompt optimization, dynamic exemplar selection, and a consensus mechanism.<n>An open-source Python package (PoliPrompt) is available on GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-02T21:05:31Z)
• Pistis-RAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Human Feedback [41.88662700261036]
  RAG systems face limitations when semantic relevance alone does not guarantee improved generation quality. We propose Pistis-RAG, a new RAG framework designed with a content-centric approach to better align LLMs with human preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T08:52:11Z)
• Generative Context-aware Fine-tuning of Self-supervised Speech Models [54.389711404209415]
  We study the use of generative large language models (LLM) generated context information. We propose an approach to distill the generated information during fine-tuning of self-supervised speech models. We evaluate the proposed approach using the SLUE and Libri-light benchmarks for several downstream tasks: automatic speech recognition, named entity recognition, and sentiment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T15:46:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.