PQR: A Framework to Generate Diverse and Realistic User Queries that Elicit QA Agent Failures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16551v1
• Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 18:50:43 GMT
• Title: PQR: A Framework to Generate Diverse and Realistic User Queries that Elicit QA Agent Failures
• Abstract summary: We introduce PQR, a framework that surfaces agent failures with respect to specific objectives.<n>We evaluate PQR on detecting an e-commerce QA agent's unhelpful responses.
• Score: 13.33442214432416
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating LLM-based agents remains challenging because identifying meaningful failure cases often requires substantial human effort to design realistic test scenarios. Prior works primarily focus on automatically discovering agent failures induced by adversarial users, while overlooking queries with real user intents that also trigger agent failures. We introduce PQR, a framework that not only surfaces agent failures with respect to specific objectives (e.g., helpfulness, safety, etc.) but also resembles real users' intents. PQR operates through an iterative interaction between two complementary modules. The query refinement module performs rewrites to explore diverse query variations, while the prompt refinement module uses prior feedback to derive new objective-violating strategies and realism policies for refining prompts, which in turn generate failure-triggering yet realistic queries. We evaluate PQR on detecting an e-commerce QA agent's unhelpful responses. Our method uncovers 23% - 78% more unhelpful responses, and our generated queries are more diverse and realistic compared to previous methods.

Related papers

• Finding Where the Buck Stops: An Automated Failure Attribution-Based Reflection Framework for Multi-Agent Collaboration [14.41671360589919]
  DoCtOR (Diagnose-then-Correct PPO-enhanced Reflection) is a novel reflection framework that enhances multi-agent collaboration.<n>DoCtOR achieves 22%, 26%, and 27% improvements over initial success rates on HotPotQA, ChartQAPro, and Mind2Web datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-28T12:26:03Z)
• The Optimizer Is the Agent: Reasoning-Driven Search across Prompts, Programs, and ML Workflows [72.9051182568928]
  We present ReASearch, a unified framework for reasoning-driven optimization.<n>With a shared agent loop and domain-specific tools, ReASearch instantiates the exact same scaffold to optimize prompts, programs, and ML.<n>We observe that complex search behaviors emerge naturally from the agent's reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-07T02:15:39Z)
• MMAgent-R$^2$: Learning to Rerank and Reject for Agentic mRAG [50.46218163777298]
  Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) requires models to retrieve visual entities matching the query image from large-scale encyclopedic knowledge bases and answer related questions.<n>We propose MMAgent-R$2$, an agentic mRAG framework that integrates visual reranking and active rejection as its internal verification mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T13:15:39Z)
• FAMA: Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic Framework for Open-Source LLMs in Interactive Tool Use Environments [60.3427704389541]
  Large Language Models are being increasingly deployed as the decision-making core of autonomous agents.<n>Yet, in conversational benchmarks, these agents frequently fail due to the cascading effects of incorrect decision-making.<n>We present the Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic framework to tackle these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T02:21:53Z)
• The Unlearning Mirage: A Dynamic Framework for Evaluating LLM Unlearning [54.67958855362658]
  We propose a dynamic framework that stress tests unlearning using complex structured queries.<n>Our approach first elicits knowledge from the target model (pre-unlearning) and constructs targeted probes, ranging from simple queries to multi-hop chains.<n>Our framework enables practical and scalable evaluation of unlearning methods without the need for manual construction of forget test sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T19:51:33Z)
• Query Suggestion for Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Dynamic In-Context Learning [42.850404278428954]
  We introduce robust dynamic few-shot learning which retrieves examples from relevant user queries.<n>We show that our system can be self-learned, for instance on prior user queries, and is therefore easily applicable in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T00:56:38Z)
• Is Agentic RAG worth it? An experimental comparison of RAG approaches [0.07777489763207261]
  "Retrieval-Augmented Generation" systems are usually defined by the combination of a generator and a retrieval component.<n>These shortcomings have motivated the development of "Enhanced" RAG.<n>The growing self-reflective capabilities of Large Language Models have enabled a new paradigm, which we refer to as "Agentic" RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T16:43:44Z)
• DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [48.971606069204825]
  DoVer is an intervention-driven debug framework for large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems.<n>It augments hypothesis generation with active verification through targeted interventions.<n>DoVer flips 18-28% of failed trials into successes, achieves up to 16% milestone progress, and validates or refutes 30-60% of failure hypotheses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T09:23:48Z)
• AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress [71.02263260394261]
  Large language models (LLMs) still encounter challenges in multi-turn decision-making tasks.<n>We build process reward models (PRMs) to evaluate each decision and guide the agent's decision-making process.<n>AgentPRM captures both the interdependence between sequential decisions and their contribution to the final goal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T14:57:54Z)
• QAgent: A modular Search Agent with Interactive Query Understanding [25.147900132089777]
  Large language models excel at natural language tasks but are limited by their static parametric knowledge.<n>We propose a unified agentic RAG framework that employs a search agent for adaptive retrieval.<n> Experiments show QAgent excels at QA and serves as a plug-and-play module for real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T16:08:05Z)
• Agent4FaceForgery: Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Realistic Face Forgery Detection [108.5042835056188]
  This work introduces Agent4FaceForgery to address two fundamental problems.<n>How to capture the diverse intents and iterative processes of human forgery creation.<n>How to model the complex, often adversarial, text-image interactions that accompany forgeries in social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T01:05:01Z)
• CLEAR-KGQA: Clarification-Enhanced Ambiguity Resolution for Knowledge Graph Question Answering [13.624962763072899]
  KGQA systems typically assume user queries are unambiguous, which is an assumption that rarely holds in real-world applications.<n>We propose a novel framework that dynamically handles both entity ambiguity (e.g., distinguishing between entities with similar names) and intent ambiguity (e.g., clarifying different interpretations of user queries) through interactive clarification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T17:34:35Z)
• MAG-V: A Multi-Agent Framework for Synthetic Data Generation and Verification [5.666070277424383]
  MAG-V is a framework to generate a dataset of questions that mimic customer queries.<n>Our synthetic data can improve agent performance on actual customer queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T19:36:11Z)
• Multi-LLM QA with Embodied Exploration [55.581423861790945]
  We investigate the use of Multi-Embodied LLM Explorers (MELE) for question-answering in an unknown environment. Multiple LLM-based agents independently explore and then answer queries about a household environment. We analyze different aggregation methods to generate a single, final answer for each query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T12:46:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.