Why Modeling Human Haptic Material Perception with AI Is Difficult

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16602v1
• Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 20:05:34 GMT
• Title: Why Modeling Human Haptic Material Perception with AI Is Difficult
• Abstract summary: Touch plays a central role in how humans perceive and recognize materials through physical contact.<n>Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities to model and exploit tactile data.<n>This paper argues that progress at the intersection of AI and haptics is constrained by three key bottlenecks.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Touch plays a central role in how humans perceive and recognize materials through physical contact. Despite decades of research, the mechanisms by which tactile signals are transformed into meaningful perceptual representations remain poorly understood, limiting the design of interactive systems and intelligent agents with human-like haptic perception. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer new opportunities to model and exploit tactile data; however, haptics presents fundamental challenges for contemporary AI due to its interaction-dependent, multimodal nature. This position paper argues that progress at the intersection of AI and haptics is constrained by three key bottlenecks: (1) the scarcity of large, diverse, and balanced haptic datasets; (2) the lack of standardized evaluation platforms and perceptual benchmarks; and (3) limitations in model capacity and interpretability when applied to tactile perception. I discuss how these challenges impede generalization, reproducibility, and scientific insight into human touch and review emerging strategies to address them. This paper highlights opportunities for coordinated, cross-disciplinary efforts to advance AI systems that not only perform robust haptic perception but also contribute to a deeper understanding of human touch.

Related papers

• Learning to Feel Materials from Multisensory Tactile Data via Interpretable Models [4.189643331553923]
  We present an interpretable computational framework for modeling human material perception and recognition using multisensory touch data.<n>Results show that combining information from pressing, static contact, and sliding interactions improves prediction accuracy.<n>These findings highlight the importance of thermal and compliance cues, which remain underrepresented in current robotic fingers and haptic displays.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T08:20:01Z)
• AI Deception: Risks, Dynamics, and Controls [153.71048309527225]
  This project provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the AI deception field.<n>We identify a formal definition of AI deception, grounded in signaling theory from studies of animal deception.<n>We organize the landscape of AI deception research as a deception cycle, consisting of two key components: deception emergence and deception treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T16:56:04Z)
• Invisible Architectures of Thought: Toward a New Science of AI as Cognitive Infrastructure [0.0]
  "Cognitive Infrastructure Studies" (CIS) is a new interdisciplinary domain to reconceptualize AI as "cognitive infrastructures"<n>CIS aims to address how AI preprocessing reshapes distributed cognition across individual, collective, and cultural scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T15:33:47Z)
• Position: Olfaction Standardization is Essential for the Advancement of Embodied Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  We argue that the exclusion of olfactory perception from AI architectures is not due to irrelevance but to structural challenges.<n>We call for cross-disciplinary collaboration to formalize olfactory benchmarks, develop multimodal datasets, and define the sensory capabilities necessary for machines to understand, navigate, and act within human environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-31T05:35:13Z)
• Neural Brain: A Neuroscience-inspired Framework for Embodied Agents [78.61382193420914]
  Current AI systems, such as large language models, remain disembodied, unable to physically engage with the world.<n>At the core of this challenge lies the concept of Neural Brain, a central intelligence system designed to drive embodied agents with human-like adaptability.<n>This paper introduces a unified framework for the Neural Brain of embodied agents, addressing two fundamental challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T15:05:34Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• On the Emergence of Symmetrical Reality [51.21203247240322]
  We introduce the symmetrical reality framework, which offers a unified representation encompassing various forms of physical-virtual amalgamations. We propose an instance of an AI-driven active assistance service that illustrates the potential applications of symmetrical reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T16:09:39Z)
• Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic Systems [67.01132165581667]
  We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components. We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z)
• Mind the Gap! Bridging Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Understanding with Luhmann's Functional Theory of Communication [5.742215677251865]
  We apply social systems theory to highlight challenges in explainable artificial intelligence. We aim to reinvigorate the technical research in the direction of interactive and iterative explainers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T13:31:02Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.