Multi-task learning on partially labeled datasets via invariant/equivariant semi-supervised learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17624v1
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 19:43:05 GMT
- Title: Multi-task learning on partially labeled datasets via invariant/equivariant semi-supervised learning
- Abstract summary: We use the popular FixMatch method for invariant semi-supervised learning and its equivariant extension FixMatch.<n>We evaluate their performance on the Cityscapes and BDD100K datasets in the context of the prevalent object detection and semantic segmentation tasks in computer vision.
- Score: 51.616045590947344
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: We investigate the potential of invariant and equivariant semi-supervised learning for addressing the challenges of training multi-task models on partially labeled datasets with differently structured output tasks. Specifically, we use the popular FixMatch method for invariant semi-supervised learning and its equivariant extension Dense FixMatch. We evaluate their performance on the Cityscapes and BDD100K datasets in the context of the prevalent object detection and semantic segmentation tasks in computer vision. We consider varying sizes of the subsets annotated for each task and different overlaps among them. Our results for both invariant and equivariant semi-supervised learning outperform supervised baselines in most situations, with the most significant improvements observed when fewer labeled samples are available for a task and generally better results for the latter approach. Our study suggests that invariant/equivariant learning is a promising general direction for multi-task learning from limited labeled data.
Related papers
- Distribution Matching for Multi-Task Learning of Classification Tasks: a
Large-Scale Study on Faces & Beyond [62.406687088097605]
Multi-Task Learning (MTL) is a framework, where multiple related tasks are learned jointly and benefit from a shared representation space.
We show that MTL can be successful with classification tasks with little, or non-overlapping annotations.
We propose a novel approach, where knowledge exchange is enabled between the tasks via distribution matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-02T14:18:11Z) - Leveraging sparse and shared feature activations for disentangled
representation learning [112.22699167017471]
We propose to leverage knowledge extracted from a diversified set of supervised tasks to learn a common disentangled representation.
We validate our approach on six real world distribution shift benchmarks, and different data modalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-17T01:33:24Z) - Self-supervised learning of Split Invariant Equivariant representations [0.0]
We introduce 3DIEBench, consisting of renderings from 3D models over 55 classes and more than 2.5 million images where we have full control on the transformations applied to the objects.
We introduce a predictor architecture based on hypernetworks to learn equivariant representations with no possible collapse to invariance.
We introduce SIE (Split Invariant-Equivariant) which combines the hypernetwork-based predictor with representations split in two parts, one invariant, the other equivariant, to learn richer representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-14T07:53:18Z) - Invariant Meta Learning for Out-of-Distribution Generalization [1.1718589131017048]
In this paper, we propose invariant meta learning for out-of-distribution tasks.
Specifically, invariant optimal meta-initialization,and fast adapt to out-of-distribution tasks with regularization penalty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-26T12:53:21Z) - Semi-supervised Multi-task Learning for Semantics and Depth [88.77716991603252]
Multi-Task Learning (MTL) aims to enhance the model generalization by sharing representations between related tasks for better performance.
We propose the Semi-supervised Multi-Task Learning (MTL) method to leverage the available supervisory signals from different datasets.
We present a domain-aware discriminator structure with various alignment formulations to mitigate the domain discrepancy issue among datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-14T07:43:39Z) - Combat Data Shift in Few-shot Learning with Knowledge Graph [42.59886121530736]
In real-world applications, few-shot learning paradigm often suffers from data shift.
Most existing few-shot learning approaches are not designed with the consideration of data shift.
We propose a novel metric-based meta-learning framework to extract task-specific representations and task-shared representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-27T12:35:18Z) - Revisiting Unsupervised Meta-Learning: Amplifying or Compensating for
the Characteristics of Few-Shot Tasks [30.893785366366078]
We develop a practical approach towards few-shot image classification, where a visual recognition system is constructed with limited data.
We find that the base class set labels are not necessary, and discriminative embeddings could be meta-learned in an unsupervised manner.
Experiments on few-shot learning benchmarks verify our approaches outperform previous methods by a 4-10% performance gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T10:08:35Z) - Towards Understanding Sample Variance in Visually Grounded Language
Generation: Evaluations and Observations [67.4375210552593]
We design experiments to understand an important but often ignored problem in visually grounded language generation.
Given that humans have different utilities and visual attention, how will the sample variance in multi-reference datasets affect the models' performance?
We show that it is of paramount importance to report variance in experiments; that human-generated references could vary drastically in different datasets/tasks, revealing the nature of each task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T20:45:14Z) - Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and
Gradient Supervision [57.14468881854616]
We propose an auxiliary training objective that improves the generalization capabilities of neural networks.
We use pairs of minimally-different examples with different labels, a.k.a counterfactual or contrasting examples, which provide a signal indicative of the underlying causal structure of the task.
Models trained with this technique demonstrate improved performance on out-of-distribution test sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T02:47:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.