Confidence-Gated Robot Autonomy: When Does Uncertainty Actually Help?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18045v1
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 08:35:27 GMT
- Title: Confidence-Gated Robot Autonomy: When Does Uncertainty Actually Help?
- Abstract summary: In threshold-gated autonomy, uncertainty matters mainly through its ability to rank likely errors.<n>We evaluate uncertainty using Spearman rank correlation, paired bootstrap equivalence testing, and act/defer agreement.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Robotic systems often use predictive uncertainty to decide whether to act autonomously or defer to a fallback policy. In threshold-gated autonomy, uncertainty matters mainly through its ability to rank likely errors. Standard metrics such as expected calibration error and AUROC do not directly test whether uncertainty changes act/defer decisions. We therefore evaluate uncertainty using Spearman rank correlation, paired bootstrap equivalence testing, and act/defer agreement. Across three temporal activity-recognition benchmarks, we find a dataset-dependent competence regime below which uncertainty provides a weak and unstable error ranking. Above this regime, softmax heuristics, MC Dropout, and ensembles produce similar gating behavior, while threshold choice has a much larger effect on execution outcomes. A multi-seed embodied simulation shows the same pattern for collision rate and cost once realized autonomy is matched. Under temporal covariate shift, ranking quality remains stable, but fine grained semantic OOD detection remains near chance. These results suggest that simple uncertainty proxies can suffice for selective gating once the base model is competent, but not for semantic novelty detection.
Related papers
- ELVAE: Evidential Learning-Based Variational Autoencoder for Uncertainty-Aware Generation [7.5571037918649155]
Variational autoencoders generate samples from probabilistic latent representations but do not distinguish uncertainty about the latent location from variability around it.<n>We formulate ELVAE, an evidential learning-based VAE in which each latent coordinate is governed by an input-dependent normal-inverse-gamma posterior.<n>Low-uncertainty anchors support more reliable synthetic samples, while high-uncertainty anchors can be deliberately exploited for stress testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-11T02:45:59Z) - Invascal: Inverse-Vacuity Self-Calibration for Uncertainty-Aware LiDAR Range-View Semantic Segmentation [3.0338740183736106]
We introduce a novel, architecture-agnostic uncertainty-aware Adapter Head.<n>It decomposes the prediction into a Preference Head for class ranking and a Strength Head that refines uncertainty assessment.<n>We propose our inverse-vacuity self-calibration objective (Invascal), which directly supervises the strength signal to produce reliable and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-20T16:39:29Z) - The Confidence Gate Theorem: When Should Ranked Decision Systems Abstain? [0.0]
Ranked decision systems must decide when to intervene in ranked outputs and when to abstain.<n>We study when confidence-based abstention monotonically improves decision quality, and when it fails.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T17:44:10Z) - Decision-Aware Trust Signal Alignment for SOC Alert Triage [0.0]
The present paper presents a decision-sensitive trust signal correspondence scheme of SOC alert triage.<n>The framework combines confidence that has been calibrated, lightweight uncertainty cues, and cost-sensitive decision thresholds into coherent decision-support layer.<n>We show that false negatives are greatly amplified by the presence of misaligned displays of confidence, whereas cost weighted loss decreases by orders of magnitude between models with decision aligned trust signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T01:41:54Z) - Towards Reliable LLM-based Robot Planning via Combined Uncertainty Estimation [68.106428321492]
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate advanced reasoning abilities, enabling robots to understand natural language instructions and generate high-level plans with appropriate grounding.<n>LLMs hallucinations present a significant challenge, often leading to overconfident yet potentially misaligned or unsafe plans.<n>We present Combined Uncertainty estimation for Reliable Embodied planning (CURE), which decomposes the uncertainty into epistemic and intrinsic uncertainty, each estimated separately.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T10:26:58Z) - Uncertainty-Driven Reliability: Selective Prediction and Trustworthy Deployment in Modern Machine Learning [1.2183405753834562]
This thesis investigates how uncertainty estimation can enhance the safety and trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) systems.<n>We first show that a model's training trajectory contains rich uncertainty signals that can be exploited without altering its architecture or loss.<n>We propose a lightweight, post-hoc abstention method that works across tasks, avoids the cost of deep ensembles, and achieves state-of-the-art selective prediction performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-11T02:33:53Z) - When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice? [69.28314307469381]
Cascades are a classical strategy to enable inference cost to vary adaptively across samples.
A deferral rule determines whether to invoke the next classifier in the sequence, or to terminate prediction.
Despite being oblivious to the structure of the cascade, confidence-based deferral often works remarkably well in practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-06T04:13:57Z) - Evaluating AI systems under uncertain ground truth: a case study in dermatology [43.8328264420381]
We show that ignoring uncertainty leads to overly optimistic estimates of model performance.<n>In skin condition classification, we find that a large portion of the dataset exhibits significant ground truth uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T10:33:45Z) - The Implicit Delta Method [61.36121543728134]
In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of uncertainty.
We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-11T19:34:17Z) - Reliability-Aware Prediction via Uncertainty Learning for Person Image
Retrieval [51.83967175585896]
UAL aims at providing reliability-aware predictions by considering data uncertainty and model uncertainty simultaneously.
Data uncertainty captures the noise" inherent in the sample, while model uncertainty depicts the model's confidence in the sample's prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-24T17:53:20Z) - Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent
Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model.
We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation.
Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z) - Approaching Neural Network Uncertainty Realism [53.308409014122816]
Quantifying or at least upper-bounding uncertainties is vital for safety-critical systems such as autonomous vehicles.
We evaluate uncertainty realism -- a strict quality criterion -- with a Mahalanobis distance-based statistical test.
We adopt it to the automotive domain and show that it significantly improves uncertainty realism compared to a plain encoder-decoder model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-08T11:56:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.